Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias

References

• Bonner, C., & Newell, B. R. (2010) In conflict with ourselves? An investigation of heuristic and analytic processes in decision making. Memory & Cognition, 38, 186–196. doi:10.3758/MC.38.2.186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248–1299. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2010). Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: It's a response bias effect. Psychological Review, 117, 831–863. DOI:10.1037/a0019634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321–339. doi:10.1080/13546780601008825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Harper, C. N. J. (2001). Necessity, possibility and belief: A study of syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 935–958. doi:10.1080/02724980042000417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42. doi:10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2014). Traditional difference-score analyses of reasoning are flawed. Cognition, 131, 75–91. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1998). Trends in Black–White test score differentials: II. The WORDSUM vocabulary test. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures (pp. 303–332). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107, 852–884. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G. S. (1951). A personal world through perception. In R. R. Blake, & G. V. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality (pp. 328–355). New York, NY: The Ronald Press Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing – therefore, (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633. doi:10.1177/0956797612457686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Garnham, A. (1989). Believability and syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 31, 117–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2013). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1–10. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0340-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J. & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014a). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 188–214. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J, & Thompson, V. A. (2014b). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 544–554. doi:10.1037/a0034887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (2000). The Raven's progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singmann, H., & Kellen, D. (2014). Concerns with the SDT approach to causal conditional reasoning: A comment on Trippas, Verde, Handley, Roser, McNair, & Evans (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (2001). Thinking styles across cultures: Their relationships with student learning. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 227–247). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J. N., Ball, L. J., Evans, J. St. B. T., & Kamal-Smith, E. (2011). When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 931–941. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.589381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 215–244. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.869763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Morley, N. J., & Newstead, S. E. (2011). Methodological and theoretical issues in belief-bias: Implications for dual process theories. In K. I. Manktelow, D. E. Over, & S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St. B. T Evans (pp. 309–338). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1275–1289. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20, 147–168. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Verde, M. F. (2013). The SDT model of belief bias: Complexity, time and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1393–1402. doi:10.1037/a0032398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., Handley, S. J, & Verde, M. F. (2014a). Fluency and belief bias in deductive reasoning: New indices for old effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 631. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., Verde, M. F., & Handley, S. J. (2014b). Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 133, 586–600. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., Verde, M. F., & Handley, S. J. (2015). Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: Reply to Singmann & Kellen (2014). Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., Verde, M. F., Handley, S. J., Roser, M., McNair, N., & Evans, J. S. B. T. (2014c). Modeling causal conditional reasoning data using SDT: Caveats and new insights. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 217. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar