Even better than the real thing: Alternative outcome bias affects decision judgements and decision regret

References

• Agrawal, N., & Maheswaran, D. (2005). Motivated reasoning in outcome‐bias effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 798–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 262–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Owen, S., Garstka, T. A., & Coleman, J. (1996). Rape and accident counterfactuals: Who might have done otherwise and would it have changed the outcome? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1042–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2002). Mental models and counterfactual thoughts about what might have been. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 426–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination: How people create alternatives to reality. Cambridge, MA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., & Reb, J. (2005). Regret in cancer-related decisions. Health Psychology, 24(4, Suppl), S29–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. G., Lehman, D. R., Wortman, C. B., Silver, R. C., & Thompson, S. C. (1995). The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(2), 109–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2011). “If only” counterfactual thoughts about exceptional actions. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1317–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, S. M., García-Madruga, J. A., & Byrne, R. M. (2009). Indicative and counterfactual ‘only if’ conditionals. Acta Psychologica, 132(3), 240–249.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, G. B., Warme, W. J., Wolf, F. M., Heckman, J. D., Brand, R. A., & Leopold, S. S. (2010). Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170, 1934–1939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch, C. A., & Byrne, R. M. (2012). Causal conditionals and counterfactuals. Acta Psychologica, 141, 54–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). Some counterfactual determinants of satisfaction and regret. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 259–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, K., & Kaplan, H. (2003). Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 46–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, W. B. G. (2004). MediaLab v2004 [Computer software]. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Landman, J. (1993). Regret: The persistence of the possible. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, D., Worth, L., & Allison, S. (1990). Outcome biased inferences and the perception of change in groups. Social Cognition, 8, 325–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., & Willingham, B. (2006). The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat: Spontaneous expressions of medal winners of the 2004 Athens Olympic games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 568–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N'gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. B. (1997). When does action elicit more regret than action and is counterfactual mutation the mediator of this effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 324–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V., Percy, E. J., Sherman, S. J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2011). Counterfactual potency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 30–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V., Seta, C. E., & Seta, J. J. (2013). Dysfunctional counterfactual thinking: When simulating alternatives to reality impedes experiential learning. Thinking & Reasoning, 19, 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V., & Sherman, S. J. (2010). Event detail and confidence in gambling: The role of counterfactual thought reactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavioral Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reb, J. (2008). Regret aversion and decision process quality: Effects of regret salience on decision process carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 570–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1109–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Outcome controllability and counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 620–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanna, L. J., Chang, E. C., & Meier, S. (2001). Counterfactual thinking and self-motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1023–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seta, C. E., & Seta, J. J. (2013). Regret in the service of change and maintenance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seta, C. E., Seta, J. J., McElroy, G. T., & Hatz, J. (2008). Regret: The roles of consistency-fit and counterfactual salience. Social Cognition, 26, 700–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seta, J. J., McElroy, T., & Seta, C. E. (2001). To do or not to do: Desirability and consistency mediate judgments of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 861–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. J., & McConnell, A. R. (1995). Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us. In N. J. Roese (Ed.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 199–231). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2007). How people think “If only…” about reasons for actions. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 461–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Taylor, B. R., & Turtle, J. W. (1987). The undoing of scenarios. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 421–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, K. (2010). Experimentation in social psychology. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lendzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 51–81) Boston, MA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, W. W., Van der Pligt, J., Manstead, A. S., Van Empelen, P., & Reinderman, D. (1998). Emotional reactions to the outcomes of decisions: The role of counterfactual thought in the experience of regret and disappointment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 117–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar