An investigation of the use of linguistic probes “by” and “in order to” in assessing moral grammar

References

• Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2004). Omission bias, individual differences, and normality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's mechanical turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemla, E., Egré, P., & Schlenker, P. (2013). Predicting moral judgments from causal judgments. Philosophical Psychology, 28, 21–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108, 353–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., & Young, L. (2011). Patterns of moral judgment derive from nonmoral psychological representations. Cognitive Science, 35, 1052–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., & Jacob, P. (2007). Universal moral grammar: A critical appraisal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., & Jacob, P. (2008). Response to Dwyer and Hauser: Sounding the retreat? Trends in cognitive sciences, 12, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S. (2009). Moral dumbfounding and the linguistic analogy: Methodological implications for the study of moral judgment. Mind & language, 24, 274–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. D. (2008). Dupoux and Jacob's moral instincts: Throwing out the baby, the bathwater and the bathtub. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, S., Huebner, B., & Hauser, M. D. (2010). The linguistic analogy: Motivations, results, and speculations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 486–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. (1970). A theory of human action (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. (1971). The individuation of action. The Journal of Philosophy, 68, 761–774.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Jin, K.-X. R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & language, 22, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, M. D., Young, L., & Cushman, F. (2008). Reviving Rawls's linguistic analogy: Operative principles and the causal structure of moral actions. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality (pp. 107–143). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2004). Intention, intentional action and moral considerations. Analysis, 64, 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2006). The concept of intentional action: A case study in the uses of folk psychology. Philosophical Studies, 130, 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2010a). Action trees and moral judgment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 555–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. (2010b). Person as scientist, person as moralist. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobe, J. & Fraser, B. (2008). Causal judgment and moral judgment: Two experiments. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, vol. 2: The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 441–448). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, A. (2011). Doctrine of double effect. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/double-effect/
   Google Scholar
• Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail, J. (2011). Elements of moral cognition: Rawls' linguistic analogy and the cognitive science of moral and legal judgment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelhoffer, T. (2006). On trying to save the simple view. Mind & Language, 21, 565–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A., Fernbach, P. M., & Ewing, S. (2009). Causal models: The representational infrastructure for moral judgment. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spranca, M., Minsk, E., & Baron, J. (1991). Omission and commission in judgment and choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 76–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprouse, J. (2011). A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. (1985). Double effect, triple effect and the trolley problem: Squaring the circle in looping cases. Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, A., & Waldmann, M. R. (2014). Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: A causal model theory. Cognition, 131, 28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiland, E. (2007). Intentional action and “in order to”. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 27, 113.
   Google Scholar