Someone is pulling the strings: hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories

References

• Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnoli, F., & Krantz, D. H. (1989). Suppressing natural heuristics by formal instruction: The case of the conjunction fallacy. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 515–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, K., & Bloom, P. (2014). Why did this happen to me? Religious believers' and non-believers' teleological reasoning about life events. Cognition, 133, 277–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J. L. (2007). Is the spell really broken? Bio-psychological explanations of religion and theistic belief. Theology and Science, 5, 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. T., & Bogart, L. M. (2003). Birth control conspiracy beliefs, perceived discrimination, and contraception among African Americans. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 263–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. T. (2005). Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs as barrier to HIV prevention among African Americans? Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 38, 213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. M., & Thorburn, S. T. (2006). Relationship of African Americans' socio demographic characteristics to belief in conspiracies about HIV/AIDS and birth control. Journal of the National Medical Association, 98, 1144–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinch, C. N., & Galloway, T. A. (2012). Schooling in adolescence raises IQ scores. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., & French, C. C. (2014). Belief in conspiracy theories and susceptibility to the conjunction fallacy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 238–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherton, R., Pickering, A. D., & French, C. C. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M., & Cooper, H. M. (1979). The desirability of control. Motivation and Emotion, 3, 381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Byford, J. (2011). Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Callan, M. J., Sutton, R. M., Harvey, A. J., & Dawtry, R. J. (2014). Immanent justice reasoning: Theory, research and current directions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 105–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, D. (2006). Conspiracy theories: The philosophical debate. Hampshire: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, P. J. (2011). Trust, cooperation and equality: A psychological analysis of the formation of social capital. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 203–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, H., Neave, N., & Holmes, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1289–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 544–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., Jolley, D., & Wood, M. J. (2015). The social, political, environmental and health-related consequences of conspiracy theories: Problems and potential solutions. In M. Bilewicz, A. Cichocka, & W. Soral (Eds.), The psychology of conspiracy (pp. 183–200). Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Eckblad, M., & Chapman, L. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenster, M. (1999). Conspiracy theories: Secrecy and power in American culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (2013). Commercial conspiracy theories: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science, 336, 493–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, R. A., Jackson, S. L., Marek, P., & Christopher, A. N. (1998) Critical thinking in introductory psychology texts and supplements. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 254–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groh, D. (1987). The temptation of conspiracy theory or: why do bad things happen to good people? Part I: Preliminary draft of a theory of conspiracy theories. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of conspiracy. (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28, 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22, 420–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014a). The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases the intention to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 35–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014b). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE, 9(2), e89177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., & DiYanni, C. (2005). Intuitions about origins: Purpose and intelligent design in children's reasoning about nature. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanman, J. A. (2012). The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 27, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9, 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K., & Gignac, G. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing- Therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 622–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. California, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, C., & Jacques, S. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: a Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 637–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, J., Hilton, D. J., & Sutton, R. M. (2007). Judgements of voluntary and physical causes in causal chains: Probabilistic and social functionalist criteria for attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 879–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHoskey, J. W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedy assassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitude polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 395–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories: public arguments as coded social critiques. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39, 40–56.
   Google Scholar
• Newheiser, A. K., Farias, M., & Tausch, N. (2011). The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 1007–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 952–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltzer, K. (2003). Magical thinking and paranormal beliefs among secondary and university students in South Africa. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1419–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). The role of analytic thinking in moral judgements and values. Thinking and Reasoning, 20, 188–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123, 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomin, R. S., & Post, J. M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., & Raji, T. T. (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement that skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9, 400–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. J., Bates, T. C., & Plomin, R. (2015). Does learning to read improve intelligence? A longitudinal multivariate analysis in identical twins from age 7 to 16. Child Development, 86, 23–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, E. (2008). It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, B. J., & Tremoulet, R. D. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenhav, A., Rand, D. G., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in god. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieger, S., Gumhalter, N., Tran, U. S., Voracek, M., & Swami, V. (2013). Girl in the cellar: A repeated cross-sectional investigation of belief in conspiracy theories about the kidnapping of Natascha Kampusch. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 297.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2009). Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy, 17, 202–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In J.-W. van Prooijen & P. A. M. van Lange (Eds.), Power, politics and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 254–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swami, V. (2012). Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., & Coles, R. (2010). The truth is out there: Belief in conspiracy theories. The Psychologist, 23, 560–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 749–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 443–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., Tran, U. S., & Furnham, A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition, 133, 572–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. M., Naccarato, M. E., & Parker, K. E. (1989). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting for the Canadian Psychological Society. Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2003). Associations between myside bias on an informal reasoning task and amount of post-secondary education. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 851–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., & Parent, J. M. (2014). American conspiracy theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W., & van Dijk, E. (2014). When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., & Epley, N. (2010). Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Deutsch, F. (2005). Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest ‘Civic’ Payoff? Journal of Civic Society, 2, 121–146.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., & Douglas, K. M. (2013). “What about building 7?” A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 767–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar