Logic programming, probability, and two-system accounts of reasoning: a rejoinder to Oaksford and Chater (2014)

References

• Ali, N., Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (2011). The mental representation of causal conditional inference: Causal models or mental models. Cognition, 119, 403–418. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.005
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., Choma, T., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Coercion and compositionality: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2131–2140. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2016). The cognitive interface. In M. Aloni & P. Dekker (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of formal semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 36–53. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2012). Does language processing evidence support compositionality? In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), Handbook of compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31, 61–83. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90018-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, D. (1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory and Cognition, 23, 646–58. doi:10.3758/BF03197265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., & Erb, C. D. (2013). A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 39, 1327–1343. doi:10.1037/a0031851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, S. M., & Oberauer, K. (2007). Reasoning with conditionals: Does every counterexample count? It’s frequency that counts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2060–2074. doi:10.3758/BF03192938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, R. A. (1988). The early years of logic programming. Communications of the ACM, 31, 38–43. doi:10.1145/35043.35046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martignon, L., & Krauss, S. (2003). Reconciling bayesianism and bounded rationality. In S. L. Schneider & J. Shanteau (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (chapter 4, pp. 108–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1996). Contexuality. In J. Oakhill & A. Garnham (Eds.), Mental models in cognitive science (pp. 1–18). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neves, D., & Anderson, J. (1981). Knowledge compilation: Mechanisms for the automatization of cognitive skills. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2005). Probabilities and pragmatics in conditional inference: Suppression and order effects. In D. Hardman & L. Macchi (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making ( chapter 6, pp. 95–122). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2011). Dual systems and dual processes but a single function. In K. I. Manktelow, D. E. Over, & S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St. B. T. Evans (pp. 339–351). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2014). Probabilistic single function dual process theory and logic programming as approaches to non-monotonicity in human vs. artificial reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning, 20, 269–295. doi:10.1080/13546783.2013.877401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, D. E. (2009). New paradigm psychology of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 431–438. doi:10.1080/13546780903266188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Geurts, B., van Lambalgen, M., Buitelaar, J., & Hagoort, P. (2010). Reasoning with exceptions: An event-related brain potentials study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 471–480. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Geurts, B., van Lambalgen, M., Buitelaar, J., Kan, C., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Conditional reasoning in high-functioning adults with autism: Evidence for impaired exception-handling. Neuropsychologia, 47, 644–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenning, K. (2012). Multiple logics within argument: How defeasible and classical reasoning work together. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 14–20). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stenning, K., Martignon, L., & van Lambalgen, M. (in preparation). Adaptive reasoning: Integrating fast and frugal heuristics with a logic of interpretation, Decision.
   Google Scholar
• Stenning, K., & van Lambalgen, M. (2008). Human reasoning and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & the ABC Research Group (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York, NY: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• van Lambalgen, M., & Hamm, F. (2004). The proper treatment of events. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Varga, A. (2013). A formal model of infants’ acquisition of practical knowledge from observation ( master's thesis). Central European University, Budapest.
   Google Scholar