Are you sure about that? Eliciting confidence ratings may influence performance on Raven's progressive matrices

References

• Ackerman, R. A. (2014). The diminishing criterion model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R. A., & Goldsmith, M. (2008). Learning directly from screen? Oh-no, I must print it! Metacognitive analysis of digitally presented text learning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research, Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R. A., & Thompson, V. (2015). Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory. In A. Feeney & V. Thompson ( Eds.), Reasoning as memory (pp. 164–178). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(1), 55–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bors, D. A., & Stokes, T. L. (1998). Raven's advanced progressive matrices: Norms for first-year university students and the development of a short form. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 382–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2002). Metacognition in strategy selection: Giving consciousness too much credit. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux ( Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 63–77). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2006). Metacognitive macroevaluations in mathematical problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinsmore, D. L., & Parkinson, M. M. (2013). What are confidence judgments made of? Students' explanations for their confidence ratings and what that means for calibration. Learning and Instruction, 24, 4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. R., Scheck, P., Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (2005). Using the past to predict the future. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1096–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, T. S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. C., & Charness, N. (2010). How to gain eleven IQ points in ten minutes: Thinking aloud improves Raven's Matrices Performance in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(2), 191–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 316–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11(2–3), 167–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, W. L., & Weaver, C. A. III. (1997). Enhanced memory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1394–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2007). Self-confidence and metacognitive processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 161–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problem-solving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams ( Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75–88). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7(2), 107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchum, A. L., Kelley, C. M., & Fox, M. C. (2016). When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 200–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, M. (2015). Behavioural methods in consciousness research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(3), 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallier, G., Wilkinson, R., Danthiir, V., Kleitman, S., Knezevic, G., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (2002). The role of individual differences in the accuracy of confidence judgements. The Journal of General Psychology, 129(3), 257–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels ( Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (Vol. 3, pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., Veenman, M. V., & Elshout, J. J. (2006). The impact of intellectual ability and metacognition on learning: New support for the threshold of problematicity theory. Learning and Instruction, 16(4), 374–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Raven's Progressive Matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory & Cognition, 17(6), 759–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., & Kelley, C. M. (2004). Self-evaluation as a moderating factor of strategy change in directed forgetting benefits. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 131–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer, K. (1996). The speed-accuracy transition due to task complexity. Intelligence, 22(2), 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidi, Y., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2016). Generalizing screen inferiority – does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks? Metacognition and Learning, 11(1), 15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Duval, T. S. (2001). Objective self-awareness theory: Recent progress and enduring problems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 230–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderstrom, N. C., Clark, C. T., Halamish, V., & Bjork, E. L. (2015). Judgments of learning as memory modifiers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1979). Social cognitive theory and self. Efficacy: Implications for motivation theory and practice. In R. M. Steers & L. W. Porter ( Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Stankov, L. (1998). Calibration curves, scatterplots and the distinction between general knowledge and perceptual tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(1), 29–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L. (2000). Complexity, metacognition, and Fluid Intelligence. Intelligence, 28(2), 121–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L. (2013). Noncognitive predictors of intelligence and academic achievement: An important role of confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 727–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Crawford, J. D. (1997). Self-confidence and performance on tests of cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 25(2), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2008). Confidence and cognitive test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 961–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., & Lee, J. (2014). Quest for the best non-cognitive predictor of academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012). Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety? Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 747–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R .J., Kaufman, J. C., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2008). Applied intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2012). Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(7), 1376–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. Evans & K. Frankish ( Eds.), Two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L.L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B. (2000). Self-regulation in organizational settings: A tale of two paradigms. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner ( Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 303–341). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vancouver, J. B., & Tischner, E. C. (2004). The effect of feedback sign on task performance depends on self-concept discrepancies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1092.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman ( Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–19). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar