Shared and distinct cue utilization for metacognitive judgements during reasoning and memorisation

References

• Ackerman, R. (2014). The Diminishing Criterion Model for metacognitive regulation of time investment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1349–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Koriat, A. (2011). Response latency as a predictor of the accuracy of children's reports. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(4), 406–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., Leiser, D., & Shpigelman, M. (2013). Is comprehension of problem solutions resistant to misleading heuristic cues? Acta Psychologica, 143(1), 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (2015). Meta-reasoning: What can we learn from meta-memory? In A. Feeney & V. Thompson (Eds.), Reasoning as memory (pp. 164–182). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (in press). Meta-reasoning: Shedding meta-cognitive light on reasoning research. In L. Ball & V. Thompson (Eds.), International handbook of thinking & reasoning. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerman, R., & Zalmanov, H. (2012). The persistence of the fluency–confidence association in problem solving. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1187–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aczel, B., Szollosi, A., & Bago, B. (2016). Lax monitoring versus logical intuition: The determinants of confidence in conjunction fallacy. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(1), 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwood, C. M., Karlsson, B. S., & Buratti, S. (2016). Does consulting with others affect answerability judgments of difficult questions? Social Influence, 11(1), 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory. Memory & Cognition, 31(2), 297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, A. S. (2005). Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 874–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, 35(4), 634–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, A. L. F., Arango-Muñoz, S., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Oops, scratch that! Monitoring one's own errors during mental calculation. Cognition, 146, 110–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Rossi, S., & Houdé, O. (2013). Bats, balls, and substitution sensitivity: Cognitive misers are no happy fools. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 269–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & D'Ydewalle, G. (2003). Inference suppression and semantic memory retrieval: Every counterexample counts. Memory & Cognition, 31(4), 581–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, M. R., Scheck, P., Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (2005). Using the past to predict the future. Memory & Cognition, 33(6), 1096–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., & Tauber, S. (2014). Understanding people's metacognitive judgments: An isomechanism framework and its implications for applied and theoretical research. In T. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of applied memory (pp. 444–464). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, D. K. (2005). Illusions of knowing: Metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 526–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin, D. K., & Hertzog, C. (2012). Age invariance in feeling of knowing during implicit interference effects. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67(5), 555–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2002). Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 978–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2008). Judgments of learning are influenced by memory for past test. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(1), 19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N., Jang, Y., Mednick, S. C., & Huber, D. E. (2012). The road not taken: Creative solutions require avoidance of high-frequency responses. Psychological Science, 23(3), 288–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56(4), 208–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (1990). Problem solving. In D. N. Osherson & E. E. Smith (Eds.), Thinking: An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 117–146). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Itai, A., & Wintner, S. (2008). Language resources for Hebrew. Language Resources and Evaluation, 42(1), 75–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, F. U., & Lindström, B. R. (2010). Using a multidimensional scaling approach to investigate the underlying basis of ease of learning judgments. Scandinavian Journal Of psychology, 51(2), 103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, C. M., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleitman, S., & Moscrop, T. (2010). Self-confidence and academic achievements in primary-school children: Their relationships and links to parental bonds, intelligence, age, and gender. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research. Part 2 (pp. 293–326). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100(4), 609–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(3), 311–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A. (2008). Subjective confidence in one's answers: The consensuality principle. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(4), 945–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 34–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H., & Nussinson, R. (2006). The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 36–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1624–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonesio, R. J., & Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., Thompson, V. A., & Brisson, J. (2015). Metacognition and abstract reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 681–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008). Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(1), 174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron-Spektor, E., Efrat-Treister, D., Rafaeli, A., & Schwarz-Cohen, O. (2011). Others' anger makes people work harder not smarter: The effect of observing anger and sarcasm on creative and analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. L., Dunlosky, J., Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2014). The font-size effect on judgments of learning: Does it exemplify fluency effects or reflect people's beliefs about memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80(1), 44–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S. J., & Duggan, G. B. (2011). Giving up problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 39(5), 902–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst, T. M., Stewart, S. M., Gruys, M. L., & Tierney, B. W. (2007). Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(3), 479–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 435–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning: Methods, data, and theory. In J. Dunlosky & S. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 65–80). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 550–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, L. L., & Serra, M. J. (2014). Domain familiarity as a cue for judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., & McClure, K. A. (1996). Repeated postevent questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20(6), 629–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedlecka, M., Paulewicz, B., & Wierzchoń, M. (2016). But i was so sure! Metacognitive judgments are less accurate given prospectively than retrospectively. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(218). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souchay, C., & Isingrini, M. (2012). Are feeling-of-knowing and judgment-of-learning different? Evidence from older adults. Acta Psychologica, 139(3), 458–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm, B. C., & Hickman, M. L. (2015). Mental fixation and metacognitive predictions of insight in creative problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 802–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J. N., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(1), 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS One, 8(1), e52961. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. K., Lee, M., & Hughes, G. (2016). Introspecting on the elusive: The uncanny state of the feeling of knowing. In J. Dunlosky & S. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 81–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Newstead, S. E., & Morley, N. J. (2011). Methodological and theoretical issues in belief bias. In K. I. Manktelow, D. E. Over, & S. Elqayam (Eds.), The science of reason: A Festschrift for Jonathan St BT Evans (pp. 309–338). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., Pennycook, G., Ball, L. J., Brack, H., Ophir, Y., & Ackerman, R. (2013). The role of answer fluency and perceptual fluency as metacognitive cues for initiating analytic thinking. Cognition, 128, 237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S. (2014). Intuition: Introducing affect into cognition. In A. Feeney & V. Thompson (Eds.), Reasoning as memory (pp. 146–163). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Bakhtiari, G., & Erle, T. M. (2016). Can I cut the Gordian tnok? The impact of pronounceability, actual solvability, and length on intuitive problem assessments of anagrams. Cognition, 146, 439–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2008). Where there's a will – there's no intuition. The unintentional basis of semantic coherence judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 1032–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect in judgements of semantic coherence. Cognition and Emotion, 23(8), 1465–1503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, B. J. (1966). Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 673–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Undorf, M., & Erdfelder, E. (2015). The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency. Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 647–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undorf, M., & Zander, T. (in press). Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (2013). A general model of fluency effects in judgment and decision making. In C. Unkelbach & R. Greifeneder (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behaviour (pp. 11–32). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon, D., & Usher, M. (2003). Dynamics of metacognitive judgments: Pre-and postretrieval mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, C. L., Castel, A. D., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When disfluency is – and is not – a desirable difficulty: The influence of typeface clarity on metacognitive judgments and memory. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawadzka, K., & Higham, P. A. (2015). Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability. Memory & Cognition, 43(8), 1168–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. A., & Kelley, C. M. (2010). “I'll remember this!” Effects of emotionality on memory predictions versus memory performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 240–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar