References
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual processtheory. Cognition, 158, 90–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
- Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The smart System 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(3), 257–299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949
- Bago, B., Frey, D., Vidal, J., Houdé, O., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2018). Fast and slow thinking: Electrophysiological evidence for early conflict sensitivity. Neuropsychologia, 117, 483–490. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.017
- Banks, A. P., & Hope, C. (2014). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning: An event-related potential study of belief bias. Psychophysiology, 51(3), 290–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12169
- Barrouillet, P. (2011). Dual-process theories and cognitive development: Advances and challenges. Developmental Review, 31(2-3), 79–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.002
- Braine, M. D., & O’Brien, D. P. (1991). A theory of if: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review, 98(2), 182–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.182
- Brisson, J., Schaeken, W., Markovits, H., & De Neys, W. (2018). Conflict detection and logical complexity. Psychologica Belgica, 58(1), 318–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.448
- Chater, N., & Oaksford, M. (1999). The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 38(2), 191–258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0696
- Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & McKay, R. (2011). Delusional belief. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 271–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131622
- De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, Fast and Slow: Advances in Dual-Process Theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855658
- De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner . Psychological Science, 17(5), 428–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x
- De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
- De Neys, W. (2014). Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.854725
- De Neys, W. (2017). Bias, conflict, and fast logic: Towards a hybrid dual process future? In W. Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
- De Neys, W., Cromheeke, S., & Osman, M. (2011). Biased but in doubt: Conflict and decision confidence. PLoS One, 6(1), e15954. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015954
- De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106(3), 1248–1299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.002
- De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we're biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.208
- De Neys, W. D., Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2008). Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science, 19(5), 483–489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x
- Dube, C., Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (2010). Assessing the belief bias effect with ROCs: it's a response bias effect. Psychological Review, 117(3), 831–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019634 20658855
- Evans, J. S., Newstead, S. E., Allen, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1994). Debiasing by instruction: The case of belief bias. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449408520148
- Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., Neilens, H., & Over, D. (2010). The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 63(5), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903111821 19728225
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2006). Dual system theories of cognition: Some issues. Paper presented at the the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 202–207).
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgement. Psychology Press.
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
- Evans, J. S. B. T., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196976
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780542000005
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
- Franssens, S., & De Neys, W. (2009). The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 15(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780802711185
- Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7(4), 237–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00366.x
- Gangemi, A., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., & Mancini, F. (2015). Feelings of error in reasoning–in search of a phenomenon. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(4), 383–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.980755
- Goel, V. (2003). Evidence for dual neural pathways for syllogistic reasoning. Psychologica, 32, 301–309.
- Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2011). Negative emotions can attenuate the influence of beliefs on logical reasoning. Cognition & Emotion, 25(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931003593942
- Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin.
- Handley, S. J., Newstead, S. E., & Trippas, D. (2011). Logic, beliefs, and instruction: A test of the default interventionist account of belief bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021098
- Handley, S. J., & Trippas, D. (2015). Dual processes and the interplay between knowledge and structure: A new parallel processing model. In Brian H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 62, pp. 33–58). Elsevier.
- Hayes, B. K., Wei, P., Dunn, J. C., & Stephens, R. G. (2020). Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(4), 699–719. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000753
- Heit, E., & Rotello, C. M. (2014). Traditional difference-score analyses of reasoning are flawed. Cognition, 131(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.003 24462712
- Howarth, S., Handley, S. J., & Walsh, C. (2016). The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict. Memory & Cognition, 44(2), 330–349. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0555-x
- Howarth, S., Handley, S., & Walsh, C. (2019). The logic sense: Exploring the role of executive functioning in belief and logic-based judgments. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(4), 416–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1523808
- Johnson-Laird, P., & Byrne, R. M. (1996). Mental models and syllogisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(03), 543–546. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00082091
- Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (1991). Deduction. Erlbaum.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
- Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
- Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (2012). Logic feels so good-I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 596–616. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026099
- Nakamura, H., & Kawaguchi, J. (2016). People like logical truth: Testing the intuitive detection of logical value in basic propositions. PLoS One, 11(12), e0169166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169166
- Newman, I. R., Gibb, M., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1154–1170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000372
- Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., Evans, J. S. B., & Allen, J. L. (1992). The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 45(3), 257–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90019-E
- Pennycook, G. (2017). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual-process models. Dual Process Theory, 2, 34.
- Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2012). Are we good at detecting conflict during reasoning? Cognition, 124(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.004
- Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Thompson, V. A. (2014). Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(2), 544–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034887
- Polito, V., Barnier, A. J., & Connors, M. H. (2018). Hypnotic clever hands: Agency and automatic responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 147(6), 815–828. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000451
- Raoelison, M., & De Neys, W. (2019). Do we de-bias ourselves?: The impact of repeated presentation on the bat-and-ball problem.
- Raoelison, M. T., Thompson, V. A., & De Neys, W. (2020). The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition, 204, 104381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381
- Reber, A. S. (1996). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconcious. Oxford University Press.
- Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning in human thinking. MIT Press.
- Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01
- Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational?: Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory. In J. S. B. Evans & K. Frankis (Eds.), In Two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford University Press.
- Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314
- Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-011-0093-6
- Stupple, E. J., & Ball, L. J. (2008). Belief–logic conflict resolution in syllogistic reasoning: Inspection-time evidence for a parallel-process model. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780701739782
- Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
- Thompson, V., & Morsanyi, K. (2012). Analytic thinking: Do you feel like it? Mind & Society, 11(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-012-0100-6
- Thompson, V. A., Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., & Evans, J. S. B. (2018). Do smart people have better intuitions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 945–961. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000457
- Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
- Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
- Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2014). Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the cognitive reflection test. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
- Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2008). Where there’s a will – there’s no intuition. The unintentional basis of semantic coherence judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.002
- Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 39–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014678
- Trippas, D., Kellen, D., Singmann, H., Pennycook, G., Koehler, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., & Dube, C. (2018). Characterizing belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 2141–2174.
- Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Verde, M. F. (2013). The SDT model of belief bias: Complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1393–1402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032398
- Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., Verde, M. F., & Morsanyi, K. (2016). Logic brightens my day: Evidence for implicit sensitivity to logical validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(9), 1448–1457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000248
- Trippas, D., Thompson, V. A., & Handley, S. J. (2017). When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias. Memory & Cognition, 45(4), 539–552. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0680-1
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
- Wegner, D. M., Fuller, V. A., & Sparrow, B. (2003). Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.5
- Whittlesea, B. W. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(6), 1235.
- Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000.