Bullshit blind spots: the roles of miscalibration and information processing in bullshit detection

References

• Anderson, C., Brion, S., Moore, D. A., & Kennedy, J. A. (2012). A status-enhancement account of overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 718–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2019). The Smart System 1: Evidence for the intuitive nature of correct responding on the bat-and-ball problem. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(3), 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1507949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 149(8), 1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blacksmith, N., Yang, Y., Behrend, T. S., & Ruark, G. A. (2019). Assessing the validity of inferences from scores on the cognitive reflection test. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(5), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burson, K. A., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman, J. (2006). Skilled or unskilled, but still ­unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavojová, V., Brezina, I., & Jurkovič, M. (2022). Expanding the bullshit research out of pseudo-transcendental domain. Current Psychology, 41(2), 827–836. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00617-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavojová, V., Secară, E., Jurkovič, M., & Šrol, J. (2019). Reception and willingness to share pseudo-profound bullshit and their relation to other epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive ability in Slovakia and Romania. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmielewski, M., & Kucker, S. C. (2020). An MTurk crisis? shifts in data quality and the impact on study results. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619875149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. (2012). Complete bullshit. In M. Otsuka (Ed.), Finding oneself in the ­other (pp. 94–114). Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.cttq956b.9
   Google Scholar
• Coutinho, M., Thomas, J., Alsuwaidi, A., & Couchman, J. J. (2021). Dunning-Kruger effect: Intuitive errors predict overconfidence on the cognitive reflection test. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 603225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.603225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, J., King, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2020). Why are self-report and behavioral measures weakly correlated? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(4), 267–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keersmaecker, J., & Roets, A. (2017). ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social ­impressions. Intelligence, 65, 107–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 7(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. L., Inzlicht, M., & Risko, E. F. (2019). Anticipating cognitive effort: roles of perceived error-likelihood and time demands. Psychological Research, 83(5), 1033–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0943-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., & Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Zeynep Enkavi, A., Li, J., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, A. M., Sleegers, W., & Mlakar, Ž. (2020). Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernbach, P. M., Light, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y., & Rozin, P. (2019). Extreme opponents of genetically modified foods know the least but think they know the most. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, H. G. (2006). On truth. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi, O., Handley, S., Howarth, S., Newman, I. R., & Thompson, V. A. (2022). Logical intuition is not really about logic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(9), 2009–2028. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E. (2022). The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111224. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gignac, G. E., & Zajenkowski, M. (2020). The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data. Intelligence, 80, 101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, G., Mraulak, V., Grinschgl, S., & Neubauer, A. (2022). Less intelligent and unaware? Accuracy and Dunning-Kruger effects for self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence. Journal of Intelligence 10(1), 10.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10010010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, R. A., Rafferty, A. N., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021). A rational model of the Dunning-Kruger effect supports insensitivity to evidence in low performers. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 756–763. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01057-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juul, J. L., & Ugander, J. (2021). Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(46), e2100786118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100786118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S. H., & Kim, J. (2022). The fragility of experts: A moderated-mediation model of expertise, expert identity threat, and overprecision. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kienzler, M., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2022). Individual differences in susceptibility to financial bullshit. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 34, 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, J., & Mueller, R. A. (2002). Unskilled, unaware, or both? The better-than-­average heuristic and statistical regression predict errors in estimates of own performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (2002). Unskilled and unaware–but why? A reply to Krueger and Mueller (2002). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 189–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Wagner, M. W. (2020). The value of not knowing: Partisan cue-taking and belief updating of the uninformed, the ambiguous, and the misinformed. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 646–669. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littrell, S., Fugelsang, J. A., & Risko, E. F. (2020). Overconfidently underthinking: narcissism negatively predicts cognitive reflection. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(3), 352–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1633404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littrell, S., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2021a). The Bullshitting Frequency Scale: Development and psychometric properties. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(1), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littrell, S., Risko, E. F., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2021b). “You can’t bullshit a bullshitter” (or can you?): Bullshitting frequency predicts receptivity to various types of misleading information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1484–1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, B. A., Montgomery, J. M., Guess, A. M., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(23), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019527118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macenczak, L. A., Campbell, S., Henley, A. B., & Campbell, W. K. (2016). Direct and interactive effects of narcissism and power on overconfidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 91, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maksimenko, V. A., Kuc, A., Frolov, N. S., Khramova, M. V., Pisarchik, A. N., & Hramov, A. E. (2020). Dissociating cognitive processes during ambiguous information processing in perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(95), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00095
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazor, M., & Fleming, S. M. (2021). The Dunning-Kruger effect revisited. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(6), 677–678. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01101-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, R. D., Fowler, E. A., Lyu, T., & Della Sala, S. (2019). Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(11), 1882–1897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkle, C., & Weber, M. (2011). True overconfidence: The inability of rational information processing to account for apparent overconfidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115(2), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. A., & Schatz, D. (2017). The three faces of overconfidence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12331–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 211, 274–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, A., Sirianni, L. A., & Addante, R. J. (2021). Neural correlates of the Dunning–Kruger effect. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 53(2), 460–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir, Y., Sisso, I., Asterhan, C. S. C., Tikochinski, R., & Reichart, R. (2020). The Turker Blues: Hidden factors behind increased depression rates among Amazon’s ­mechanical turkers. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619865973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, N., Baker, S. G., & Scherer, L. D. (2019). Evaluating the cognitive reflection test as a measure of intuition/reflection, numeracy, and insight problem solving, and the implications for understanding real-world judgments and beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(12), 2129–2153. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015a). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015b). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Ross, R. M., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2017). Dunning-Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocelli, J. V. (2022). Politically oriented bullshit detection: Attitudinally conditional bullshit receptivity and bullshit sensitivity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(6), 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A., & De Neys, W. (2020). The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition, 204, 104381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M. M., & Liersch, M. J. (2013). I am a better driver than you think: Examining self-enhancement for driving ability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1648–1659. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salovich, N. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2021). Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C., & Dunning, D. (2018). Overconfidence among beginners: Is a little learning a dangerous thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. J., & Speed, A. (2020). The impact of individual traits on domain task performance: Exploring the Dunning-Kruger Effect. United States Department of Energy. https://doi.org/10.2172/1716582
   Google Scholar
• Schlösser, T., Dunning, D., Johnson, K. L., & Kruger, J. (2013). How unaware are the unskilled? Empirical tests of the “signal extraction” counter-explanation for the Dunning-Kruger Effect in self-Evaluation of performance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scopelliti, I., Morewedge, C. K., McCormick, E., Min, H. L., Lebrecht, S., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Bias blind spot: Structure, measurement, and consequences. Management Science, 61(10), 2468–2486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, O. J., Dunning, D., & Ames, D. R. (2014). Emotionally unskilled, unaware, and uninterested in learning more: Reactions to feedback about deficits in emotional intelligence. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. (2019). Fake News: A global epidemic, vast majority (86%) of online global citizens have been exposed to it. Ipsos. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/cigi-fake-news-global-epidemic
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl, T., & Prooijen, J. V. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., Larner, S., Conchie, S. M., & van der Zee, S. (2015). Cross-cultural ­deception detection. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Wiley series in the psychology of crime, policing and law. Detecting deception: Current challenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 175–201). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J. W., Cohen Rodrigues, T., Bunzel, C., Georgescu, O., Komáromy, D., & Krouwel, A. P. (2022). Populist gullibility: Conspiracy theories, news credibility, bullshit receptivity, and paranormal belief. Political Psychology, 43(6), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2020). The better-than-­average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(2), 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Jenkins, R. (2020). Dunning–Kruger effects in face perception. Cognition, 203, 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar