The effect of cardinality in the pigeonhole principle

References

• Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, J., Grasman, R., Verhagen, A. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). An introduction to bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41(2), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314560412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagassi, M., & Macchi, L. (2006). Pragmatic approach to decision making under uncertainty: The case of the disjunction effect. Thinking & Reasoning, 12(3), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780500375663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J. (2002). Is the human mind definitely not bayesian? A review of the various arguments. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 21, 653–682.
   Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J. (2009). Updating our beliefs about inconsistency: The monty-hall case. Mathematical Social Sciences, 57(1), 67–95. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489608000875 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., & Noveck, I. A. (2000). Not only base rates are neglected in the engineer-lawyer problem: An investigation of reasoners’ underutilization of complementarity. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2006). Is the mind bayesian? The case for agnosticism. Mind & Society, 5(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0007-1
   Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2007). The psychology of dynamic probability judgment: Order effect, normative theories and experimental methodology. Mind & Society, 6(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0025-z
   Google Scholar
• Baratgin, J., & Politzer, G. (2010). Updating: A psychologically basic situation of probability revision. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(4), 253–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2010.519564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Hillel, M., Noah, T., & Frederick, S. (2018). Learning psychology from riddles: The case of stumpers. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(1), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S193029750000886X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2005). Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97(1), 41–66. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027704001787 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1998). Knowledge of number: Its evolution and ontogeny. Science (New York, N.Y.), 282(5389), 641–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 472–517. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028572900199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(72)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002779290049N https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-n
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., & Changeux, J.-P. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5(4), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulany, D. E., & Hilton, D. J. (1991). Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Social Cognition, 9(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (2014). A closer look at the notorious birthday coincidences. Teaching Statistics, 36(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12014
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2007). From mere coincidences to meaningful discoveries. Cognition, 103(2), 180–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1971). Comprehension of negation with quantification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(3), 244–253. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022537171800518 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80051-8
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8(4), 441–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leurechon, J. (1622). Selectæ propositiones in tota sparsim mathematica pulcherrimæ. Gasparem Bernardum.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, J., & Kaup, B. (2006). Context effects when reading negative and affirmative sentences. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 28, pp. 1735–1740). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Macchi, L. (2000). Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macchi, L., & Bagassi, M. (2012). Intuitive and analytical processes in insight problem solving: A psycho-rhetorical approach to the study of reasoning. Mind & Society, 11(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-012-0103-3
   Google Scholar
• Macchi, L., Caravona, L., Poli, F., Bagassi, M., & Franchella, M. A. G. (2020). Speak your mind and I will make it right: The case of “selection task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1707207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macchi, L., Poli, F., Caravona, L., Vezzoli, M., Franchella, M. A. G., & Bagassi, M. (2019). How to get rid of the belief bias: Boosting analytical thinking via pragmatics. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i3.1794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercier, H., Politzer, G., & Sperber, D. (2017). What causes failure to apply the pigeonhole principle in simple reasoning problems? Thinking & Reasoning, 23(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1273852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersenne, M. (1625). La Vérité des sciences. Contre les septiques ou Pyrrhoniens. Toussainct du Bray.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Aldrich, J., González Cabillón, J., de Araújo, C. C., Landau, J. A., de Campos Almeida, M., & Wilkin, D. (2021). Earliest known uses of some of the words of mathematics. https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Miller/mathword/
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215(5109), 1519–1520. https://doi.org/10.1038/2151519a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordemeyer, A., & Frank, M. C. (2014). A pragmatic account of the processing of negative sentences. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 36, p. 2699–2704).
   Google Scholar
• Politzer, G., & Macchi, L. (2000). Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind & Society, 1(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02512230
   Google Scholar
• Rittaud, B., & Heeffer, A. (2014). The pigeonhole principle, two centuries before Dirichlet. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 36(2), 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-013-9389-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C. (2005). The (neuro)-psychology of mass and count nouns. Brain and Language, 95(1), 88–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.07.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57(1), 31–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00666-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiese, H. (2001). Did language give us numbers? Symbolic thinking and the emergence of systematic numerical cognition. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 23, p. 1118–1123). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wiese, H. (2007). The co-evolution of number concepts and counting words. Lingua, 117(5), 758–772. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384106000635 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar