Robust intuition? Exploring the difference in the strength of intuitions from perspective of attentional bias

References

• Akyurek, E. G., Dinkelbach, A., & Schubo, A. (2010). The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli. Brain Research, 1307, 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyurek, E. G., & Schubo, A. (2011). The allocation of attention in displays with simultaneously presented singletons. Biological Psychology, 87(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017a). Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory. Cognition, 158, 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2017b). Rise and fall of conflicting intuitions during reasoning. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 87–92). Cognitive Science Society. https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2017/papers/0028/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Bago, B., & De Neys, W. (2020). Advancing the specification of dual process models of higher cognition: A critical test of the hybrid model view. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1552194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., Frey, D., Vidal, J., Houde, O., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2018). Fast and slow thinking: Electrophysiological evidence for early conflict sensitivity. Neuropsychologia, 117, 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, H. W. S. (2021). bruceR: Broadly useful convenient and efficient R functions. R package version 0.8.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bruceR
   Google Scholar
• Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In: H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 3–22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Boissin, E., Caparos, S., Raoelison, M., & De Neys, W. (2021). From bias to sound intuiting: Boosting correct intuitive reasoning. Cognition, 211, 104645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. M., & Mujica-Parodi, L. R. (2015). Facilitated attentional orienting and delayed disengagement to conscious and nonconscious fearful faces. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0185-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. M., & Reinke, K. S. (2014). Attending to the fear in your eyes: Facilitated orienting and delayed disengagement. Cognition and Emotion, 28(8), 1398–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.885410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. W. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Chantal, P. L., Newman, I. R., Thompson, V., & Markovits, H. (2020). Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus. Memory & Cognition, 48(4), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00998-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science : A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 7(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611429354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2014). Conflict detection, dual processes, and logical intuitions: Some clarifications. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.854725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2015). Heuristic bias and conflict detection during thinking. In: B.H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 62, pp. 1–32). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.001
   Google Scholar
• De Neys, W., & Pennycook, G. (2019). Logic, fast and slow: Advances in dual-process theorizing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419855658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2010). Intuition and reasoning: A dual-process perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2010.521057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J, S. B. T., Ball, L. J., & Brooks, P. G. (1987). Attentional bias and decision order in a reasoning task. British Journal of Psychology, 78(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1987.tb02256.x
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780542000005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013a). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013b). Theory and metatheory in the study of dual processing: Reply to comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 8(3), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613483774
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1999). Intuitions and schemata in mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 11–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003488222875
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. E., & Vink, M. (2018). Alcohol-related attentional bias variability and conflicting automatic associations. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 9(2), 204380871877963. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.062317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handley, S. J., Newstead, S. E., & Trippas, D. (2011). Logic, beliefs, and instruction: A test of the default interventionist account of belief bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021098
   Google Scholar
• Handley, S. J., & Trippas, D. (2015). Dual processes and the interplay between knowledge and structure: A new parallel processing model. In: B.H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 62, pp. 33–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2014.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Hockey, G. R. J. (1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1–3), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. B., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2012). Memory-guided attention: Control from multiple memory systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(12), 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & De Houwer, J. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., de Chantal, P. L., Brisson, J., Dube, E., Thompson, V., & Newman, I. (2021). Reasoning strategies predict use of very fast logical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 49(3), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01108-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, H., de Chantal, P. L., Brisson, J., & Gagnon-St-Pierre, E. (2019). The development of fast and slow inferential responding: Evidence for a parallel development of rule-based and belief-based intuitions. Memory & Cognition, 47(6), 1188–1200. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00927-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., Busdraghi, C., & Primi, C. (2014). Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: A potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases. Behavioral and Brain Functions : BBF, 10(1), 31. 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-10-31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., Devine, A., Nobes, A., & Szűcs, D. (2013). The link between logic, mathematics and imagination: Evidence from children with developmental dyscalculia and mathematically gifted children. Developmental Science, 16(4), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., Kahl, T., & Rooney, R. (2017). The link between math and logic in adolescence: The effect of argument form. In M. E. Toplak & J. Weller (Eds.), Individual differences in judgment and decision making from a developmental context (pp. 166–185). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morsanyi, K., McCormack, T., & O’Mahony, E. (2018). The link between deductive reasoning and mathematics. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(2), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1384760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naert, L., Bonato, M., & Fias, W. (2018). Asymmetric spatial processing under cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, I. R., Gibb, M., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1154–1170. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000372.supp
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G. (2017). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual process models. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., De Neys, W., Evans, J., Stanovich, K. E., & Thompson, V. A. (2018). The mythical dual-process typology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 667–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Thompson, V. A. (2012). Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0249-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, S., Zeng, Q., Luo, Y., Duan, H., Ding, C., Hu, W., & Li, H. (2014). Impact of working memory load on cognitive control in trait anxiety: An ERP study. Plos One, 9(11), e111791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raoelison, M., Boissin, E., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2021). From slow to fast logic: The development of logical intuitions. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(4), 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1885488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A., & De Neys, W. (2020). The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition, 204, 104381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F., & Rahimi-Golkhandan, S. (2017). The fuzzy-trace dual process model. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, I. D., Teoh, Y. Y., & Hutcherson, C. A. (2022). Time to pay attention? Information search explains amplified framing effects under time pressure. Psychological Science, 33(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211026983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, R. A. P., & O’Mara, S. M. (2003). Behavioural and electrophysiological correlates of visuomotor learning during a visual search task. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00146-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaki, S., & Petrusic, W. M. (2005). On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 931–937. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1459314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J., Ball, L. J., & Ellis, D. (2013). Matching bias in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence for a dual-process account from response times and confidence ratings. Thinking & Reasoning, 19(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.735622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(9), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, Y. Y., Yao, Z., Cunningham, W. A., & Hutcherson, C. A. (2020). Attentional priorities drive effects of time pressure on altruistic choice. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17326-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrence, R. D., & Troup, L. J. (2018). Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review. Psychophysiology, 55(6), e13051. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trippas, D., & Handley, S. J. (2017). The parallel processing model of belief bias: Review and extensions. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 47–65). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoof, J., Verschaffel, L., De Neys, W., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Intuitive errors in learners’ fraction understanding: A dual-process perspective on the natural number bias. Memory & Cognition, 48(7), 1171–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01045-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C. C., Kappen, M., Hassall, C. D., Wright, B. C., & Krigolson, O. E. (2019). Thinking theta and alpha: Mechanisms of intuitive and analytical reasoning. NeuroImage, 189, 574–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Yu, T., Wang, S., Zhou, S., Tang, X., Stupple, E. J. N., & Luo, J. (2018). Event-related potentials support a dual process account of the Embedded Chinese Character Task. Neuropsychologia, 121, 186–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T., Yin, Y., Wang, S., Zhou, S., Tang, X., & Luo, J. (2018). Positive effect of intuitive processing is modulated by cognitive resources under different levels of consciousness. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(6), 583–591. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00583
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Chen, C., Zhang, H., Chen, C., Zhou, R., & Dong, Q. (2007). The operand-order effect in single-digit multiplication: An ERP study of Chinese adults. Neuroscience Letters, 414(1), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.06.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar