79
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

The implicit perception of harm following moral violations in autism

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 379-393 | Received 17 Jun 2022, Accepted 05 Jul 2023, Published online: 20 Sep 2023

References

  • Akechi, H., Kikuchi, Y., Tojo, Y., Hakarino, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2018). Mind perception and moral judgment in autism. Autism Research, 11(9), 1239–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1970
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA.
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Lombardo, M. (2013). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MITPress.
  • Bellesi, G., Vyas, K., Jameel, L., & Channon, S. (2018). Moral reasoning about everyday situations in adults with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 52, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.04.009
  • Blair, R. J. (1996). Brief report: Morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26(5), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172277
  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Cameron, C. D., Lindquist, K. A., & Gray, K. (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314566683
  • Clarke, S. (2008). SIM and the city: Rationalism in psychology and philosophy and Haidt’s account of moral judgment. Philosophical Psychology, 21(6), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080802513250
  • Dempsey, E. E., Moore, C., Johnson, S. A., Stewart, S. H., & Smith, I. M. (2020). Morality in autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Development and Psychopathology, 32(3), 1069–1085. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579419001160
  • Deutsch, R., Kordts-Freudinger, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2009). Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Experimental Psychology, 56(6), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.434
  • Franchin, L., Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2019). Many moral buttons or just one? Evidence from emotional facial expressions. Cognition & Emotion, 33(5), 943–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1520078
  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47., pp. 55–130). Academic Press.
  • Grant, C. M., Boucher, J., Riggs, K. J., & Grayson, A. (2005). Moral understanding in children with autism. Autism, 9(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361305055418
  • Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619–619. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475
  • Gray, K., Jenkins, A. C., Heberlein, A. S., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(2), 477–479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015493108
  • Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2012). Two minds vs. two philosophies: Mind perception defines morality and dissolves the debate between deontology and utilitarianism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0112-5
  • Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(4), 1600–1615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036149
  • Gray, K., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387
  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814
  • Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F., & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Virginia.
  • Hamlin, J. K. (2014). The case for social evaluation in preverbal infants: Gazing toward one’s goal drives infants’ preferences for Helpers over Hinderers in the hill paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1563–1572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01563
  • JASP Team. (2019). JASP (Version 0.16.4.0) [Computer software]. https://jasp-stats.org/.
  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31–53). Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2014). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge University Press.
  • Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R., & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006). Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism? Social Neuroscience, 1(3–4), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910600992197
  • Lomas, T. (2019). Anger as a moral emotion: A “bird’s eye “systematic review”. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 32(3–4), 341–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2019.1589421
  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, Jr, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., Pickles, A., & Rutter, M. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005592401947
  • Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
  • McAuliffe, W. H. (2019). Do emotions play an essential role in moral judgments? Thinking & Reasoning, 25(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1499552
  • Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. (2003). Meat is good to taboo: Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853703321598563
  • Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
  • Quintana, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (2018). Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: A non-technical guide using JASP. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4
  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
  • Royzman, E., Atanasov, P., Landy, J. F., Parks, A., & Gepty, A. (2014). CAD or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 14(5), 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036829
  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., Goldsher, D., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000152228.90129.99
  • Shulman, C., Guberman, A., Shiling, N., & Bauminger, N. (2012). Moral and social reasoning in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(7), 1364–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1369-8
  • Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341
  • Surian, L., & Franchin, L. (2020). On the domain-specificity of the mechanisms underpinning spontaneous anticipatory looks in false-belief tasks. Developmental Science, 23(6), e12955. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12955
  • Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007). Evaluating the theory-of-mind hypothesis of autism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 311–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00527.x
  • Tsoi, L., Dungan, J. A., Chakroff, A., & Young, L. L. (2018). Neural substrates for moral judgments of psychological versus physical harm. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(5), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy029
  • van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haaf, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharský, Š., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Gupta, A. R. K. N., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.