Responsibility attribution about mechanical devices by children and adults

References

• Andrews, G., Halford, G. S., Murphy, K., & Knox, K. (2009). Integration of weight and distance information in young children: The role of relational complexity. Cognitive Development, 24(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. R. (2016). Why what is counterfactual really matters: A response to Weisberg and Gopnik (2013). Cognitive Science, 40, 253–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. R., & Guthrie, C. (2011). Almost thinking counterfactually: Children’s understanding of close counterfactuals. Child Development, 82(4), 1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01590.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. R., & Riggs, K. J. (2014). Developing thoughts about what might have been. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. R., Riggs, K. J., & Gorniak, S. L. (2009). Relating developments in children’s counterfactual thinking and executive functions. Thinking and Reasoning, 15(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903135904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S. R., Robinson, E. J., Carroll, D. J., & Apperly, I. A. (2006). Children’s thinking about counterfactuals and future hypotheticals as possibilities. Child Development, 77(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00879.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, P., Riggs, K. J., & Beck, S. R. (2012). Executive control and the experience of regret. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(3), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J. (2016). Counterfactual thought. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S., Leahy, B., Redshaw, J., & Suddendorf, T. (2020). Could it be so? The cognitive science of possibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chockler, H., & Halpern, J. Y. (2004). Responsibility and blame: A structural-model approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 22(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1391
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. D., Hall, E. J., & Paul, L. A. (2004). Causation and counterfactuals. MIT Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, M. (2009). Achieving a new dimension: Children integrate three dimensions stimulus in volume estimations. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 877–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enzle, M.E., & Schopflocher, D. (1978). Instigation of attribution processes by attributional questions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 595–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2021). How people keep track of what is real and what is imagined: The epistemic status of counterfactual alternatives to reality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 547–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino, O., Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2020). Possibilities and the parallel meanings of factual and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 48(7), 1263–1280. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01040-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, T. P. (1999). Children’s causal reasoning: Counterfactual thinking occurs for "negative" outcomes only. Developmental Science, 2(4), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2010). Spreading the blame: The allocation of responsibility amongst multiple agents. Cognition, 115(1), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2012). When contributions make a difference: Explaining order effects in responsibility attribution. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0256-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Sánchez, J., Moreno-Ríos, S. & Frosch, C. (2021). Alternatives or syntactic negation? Adults’ and children’s preferences for constructing counterfactual possibilities. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02456-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Sánchez, J., Ruiz-Ballesteros, J. A., & Moreno-Ríos, S. (2020). How children and adults keep track of real information when thinking counterfactually. PLoS One, 15(12), e0242967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Veiga, I., García-Madruga, J. A., & Moreno-Ríos, S. (2010). The interpretation of indicative and subjunctive concessives. Acta Psychologica, 134(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guajardo, N. R., Parker, J., & Turley-Ames, K. (2009). Associations among false belief understanding, counterfactual reasoning, and executive function. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X357886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gweon, H., Dodell-Feder, D., Bedny, M., & Saxe, R. (2012). Theory of mind perfomance in children correlates with functional especialization of bran region for thinking abouth thougts. Child Development, 83(6), 1853–1868. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X357886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, J. Y., & Pearl, J. (2005). Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach. Part I: Causes. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 843–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi147
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, D. J. (1990). Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/10034-000
   Google Scholar
• Kominsky, J. F., Gerstenberg, T., Pelz, M., Sheskin, M., Singmann, H., Schulz, L., & Keil, F. C. (2021). The trajectory of counterfactual simulation in development. Developmental Psychology, 57(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskuba, K., Gerstenberg, T., Gordon, H., Lagnado, D., & Schlottmann, A. (2018). What’s fair? How children assign reward to members of teams with differing causal structures. Cognition, 177, 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (2012). The development of causal reasoning. WIREs Cognitive Science, 3(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagnado, D. A. & Gerstenberg, T. (2015). A difference-making framework for intuitive judgments of responsibility. In D. Shoemaker (Ed.), Oxford studies in agency and responsibility: Volume 3 (pp. 213–241). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199694853.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lagnado, D. A., & Gerstenberg, T. (2017). Causation in legal and moral reasoning. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 565–601). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lagnado, D. A., Gerstenberg, T., & Zultan, R. (2014). Causal responsability and counterfactuals. Cognitive Science, 37(6), 1036–1073. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahy, B., Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2014). Basic conditional reasoning: How children mimic counterfactual reasoning. Studia Logica, 102, 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-013-9510-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, X., & Huh, Y.E. (2020). Who gets the blame for service failure? Attribution of responsibility toward robot versus human service providers and service firms. Computer in Human Behavior, 113, 106520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1973). Causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(17), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025310
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. Philosophical Papers, 2, 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195036468.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, T., Ho, M., Gribben, C., O’Connor, E., & Hoerl, C. (2018). The development of counterfactual reasoning about doubly-determined events. Cognitive Development, 45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. S. (2009). Causation and responsibility: An essay in law, morals, and metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Rios, S., & García-Madruga, J. A. (2002). El desarrollo del razonamiento sobre lo que podría haber ocurrido: Condicionales indicativos y subjuntivos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 25(3), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037002762064055
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Ríos, S., García-Madruga, J. A., & Byrne, R. M. (2008). Inferences from Semifactual ‘Even if’ conditionals. Acta Psicológica. Acta Psychologica, 128, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muentener, P., & Bonawitz, E. (2017). The development of causal reasoning. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 677–698). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.40
   Google Scholar
• Nyhout, A., & Ganea, P. A. (2019). Mature counterfactual reasoning in 4- and 5-year-olds. Cognition, 183, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhout, A., Henke, L., & Ganea, P. A. (2019). Children’s counterfactual reasoning about causally overdetermined events. Child Development, 90(2), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, E., McCormack, T., & Feeney, A. (2012). Do children who experience regret make better decisions? A developmental study of the behavioral consequences of regret. Child Development, 85(5), 1995–2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161
   Google Scholar
• Peteranderl, S., & Edelsbrunner, P. A. (2020). The predictive value of children’s understanding of indeterminacy and confounding for later mastery of the control-of-variables strategy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 33335493. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.531565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafetseder, E., & Perner, J. (2018). Belief and counterfactuality: A teleological theory of belief attribution. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafetseder, E., Cristi-Vargas, R., & Perner, J. (2010). Counterfactual reasoning: Developing a sense of “nearest possible world.” Child Development, 81(1), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01401.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafetseder, E., O’Brien, C., Leahy, B., & Perner, J. (2021). Extended difficulties with counterfactuals persist in reasoning with false beliefs: Evidence for teleology-in-perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 204, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafetseder, E., Schwitalla, M., & Perner, J. (2013). Counterfactual reasoning: From childhood to adulthood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. (1987). Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review, 94(1), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldán-Tapia, M. D., Moreno-Ríos, S., & Cánovas-López, R. (2017). Thinking about social and nonsocial alternative possibilities in premature preschoolers. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(8), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1257703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Ballesteros, J. A., & Moreno-Ríos, S. (2017). Concessive and semifactual interpretations during reasoning with multiple conditionals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(7), 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1172098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruíz-Ballesteros, J.A. & Moreno-Ríos, S. (2016). Inherent directionality of “even if”? counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(4), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2016.1142996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaría, C., Espino, O., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 1149–1154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlottmann, A., & Wilkening, F. (2011). Judgment and decision making in young children. In M. K. Dhami, A. Schlottmann, & M. R. Waldmann (Eds.), Judgement and decision making as a skill: Learning, development, evolution (pp. 55–84). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (1978). Children’s thinking: What develops? Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, D. P., & Beck, S. R. (2012). The development of children’s regret and relief. Cognition and Emotion, 26(5), 820–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.621933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195155270.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Zultan, R., Gerstenberg, T., & Lagnado, D. A. (2012). Finding fault: Causality and counterfactuals in group attributions. Cognition, 125(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar