Bulky DNA adduct levels in normal-appearing colon mucosa, and the prevalence of colorectal adenomas

References

• Altieri, F., et al., 2008. DNA damage and repair: from molecular mechanisms to health implications. Antioxidants & redox signaling, 10 (5), 891–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W.W., Giri, A.K., and Ruchirawat, M., 2010. Challenge assay: a functional biomarker for exposure-induced DNA repair deficiency and for risk of cancer. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 213 (1), 32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvard, V., et al., 2015. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet oncology, 16 (16), 1599–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, H., et al., 2007. Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening colonoscopies. Gut, 56 (11), 1585–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, A., et al., 2010. Polymorphisms in base excision repair genes as colorectal cancer risk factors and modifiers of the effect of diets high in red meat. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 19 (12), 3167–3173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, V.S., et al., 2011. Genetic polymorphisms of genes involved in DNA repair and metabolism influence micronucleus frequencies in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutagenesis, 26 (1), 33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen, K.T., et al., 2010. Lifestyle, environmental, and genetic predictors of bulky DNA adducts in a study population nested within a prospective Danish cohort. Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 73 (9), 583–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, P.B., et al., 2005. DNA adducts: mass spectrometry methods and future prospects. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 207 (2), 293–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferlay, J., et al., 2013. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC cancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, P.P., et al., 2010. High-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry for the detection and quantitation of pyrrolizidine alkaloid-derived DNA adducts in vitro and in vivo. Chemical research in toxicology, 23 (3), 637–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, G., et al., 2010. Genetic polymorphism in metabolism and host defense enzymes: implications for human health risk assessment. Critical reviews in toxicology, 40 (7), 575–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, R.W., et al., 1998. Differences in aromatic-DNA adduct levels between alveolar macrophages and subpopulations of white blood cells from smokers. Carcinogenesis, 19 (5), 819–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Villalta, P.W., and Turesky, R.J., 2017. Data-independent mass spectrometry approach for screening and identification of DNA adducts. Analytical chemistry, 89 (21), 11728–11736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D.H., et al., 2000. Methods of DNA adduct determination and their application to testing compounds for genotoxicity. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 35 (3), 222–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelstein, M.W., et al., 2009. Creating context for the use of DNA adduct data in cancer risk assessment: II. Overview of methods of identification and quantitation of DNA damage. Critical reviews in toxicology, 39 (8), 679–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, V., et al., 2017. Exposure to meat-derived carcinogens and bulky DNA adduct levels in normal-appearing colon mucosa. Mutation research/genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis, 821, 5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, V., et al., 2014. Meat-derived carcinogens, genetic susceptibility and colorectal adenoma risk. Genes & nutrition, 9 (6), 430-014–0430-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, V., et al., 2015. Gene-diet interactions in exposure to heterocyclic aromatic amines and bulky DNA adduct levels in blood leukocytes. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 56 (7), 609–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, R., et al., 2014. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms of ERCC1 and XPF with colorectal cancer risk and interaction with tobacco use. Gene, 548 (1), 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalal, S., Earley, J.N., and Turchi, J.J., 2011. DNA repair: from genome maintenance to biomarker and therapeutic target. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American association for cancer research, 17 (22), 6973–6984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamin, E.L., et al., 2007. New insights in the formation of deoxynucleoside adducts with the heterocyclic aromatic amines PhIP and IQ by means of ion trap MSn and accurate mass measurement of fragment ions. Journal of the American society for mass spectrometry, 18 (12), 2107–2118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, G., et al., 2010. Interactions between Exposure to Environmental Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and DNA Repair Gene Polymorphisms on Bulky DNA Adducts in Human Sperm. Plos one, 5 (10), e13145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelslegers, H.B., et al., 2006. Interindividual variations in DNA adduct levels assessed by analysis of multiple genetic polymorphisms in smokers. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the american association for cancer research, cosponsored by the american society of preventive oncology, 15 (4), 624–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W.D., et al., 2014. A cross-sectional study of global DNA methylation and risk of colorectal adenoma. BMC cancer, 14 (1), 488–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klaene, J.J., et al., 2013. The analysis of DNA adducts: the transition from (32)P-postlabeling to mass spectrometry. Cancer letters, 334 (1), 10–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateuca, R.A., Decordier, I., and Kirsch-Volders, M., 2012. Cytogenetic methods in human biomonitoring: principles and uses. Methods in molecular biology (clifton, N.J), 817, 305–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monien, B.H., 2014. Mass spectrometric DNA adduct quantification by multiple reaction monitoring and its future use for the molecular epidemiology of cancer. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 806, 383–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norppa, H., et al., 2006. Chromosomal aberrations and SCEs as biomarkers of cancer risk. Mutation research, 600 (1-2), 37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D.H., Hewer, A., and Arlt, V.M., 2005. 32P-Postlabeling Analysis of DNA Adducts. In: P. Keohavong. and S.G. Grant, eds. Molecular toxicology protocols. Methods in molecular biology^TM. vol 291. Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piberger, A.L., et al., 2018. BPDE-induced genotoxicity: relationship between DNA adducts, mutagenicity in the in vitro PIG-A assay, and the transcriptional response to DNA damage in TK6 cells. Archives of toxicology, 92 (1), 541–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J.D., 1999. Colorectal cancer: molecules and populations. Journal of the national cancer institute, 91 (11), 916–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, R., and Farmer, P.B., 2006. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: the future of DNA adduct detection. Carcinogenesis, 27 (2), 178–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spigelman, A.D., et al., 1991. DNA adducts, detected by 32P-postlabelling, in the foregut of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and in unaffected controls. Carcinogenesis, 12 (9), 1727–1732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, C.C., et al., 2005. MS-920: DNA repair gene polymorphisms, diet and colorectal cancer risk in Taiwan. Cancer letters, 224 (2), 279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2012. Nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 polymorphisms contribute to cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Mutagenesis, 27 (1), 67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar