References
- Baeyens, J.P., et al., 2019. Questioning the “SPIN and SNOUT” rule in clinical testing. Archives of physiotherapy, 9, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-019-0056-5
- Begg, C.B., 1987. Biases in the assessment of diagnostic tests. Statistics in medicine, 6 (4), 411–424.
- Bossuyt, P.M., et al., 2015. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 351, h5527.
- Chan, A.-W., and Hróbjartsson, A., 2018. Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations. Trials, 19 (1), 116.
- Cohen, J.F., et al., 2016. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ open, 6 (11), e012799. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/11/e012799.abstract
- Collins, G.S., et al., 2015. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 350, g7594.
- Deeks, J.J. (2020) 21 ways to spin results from a Covid diagnostic test accuracy. https://twitter.com/deeksj/status/1261626751375093760?lang=en
- Gigerenzer, G., 2014. Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York, NY: Penguin.
- Haseman, J.K., 1995. COMPACT predictions: is there a catch? Environmental health perspectives, 103 (6), 536–538. PMCID: PMC1519133.
- Holliday, E.G., Scott, R.J., and Attia, J., 2010. Evidence-based medicine in the era of biomarkers: teaching a new dog old tricks? Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 88 (6), 740–742.
- Korevaar, D.A., et al., 2015. Reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: some improvements after 10 years of STARD. Radiology, 274 (3), 781–789.
- Korevaar, D.A., et al., 2019. Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses. Diagnostic and prognostic research, 3, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-006
- Macaskill, P., et al., 2010. Chapter 10: analysing and presenting results. In: J.J. Deeks, P.M. Bossuyt, and C. Gatsonis, ed. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. https://methods.cochrane.org/sdt/handbook-dta-reviews
- Mahase, E., 2021. Covid-19: People are not being warned about pitfalls of mass testing. BMJ, 372, n238. doi:
- Maxim, L.D., Niebo, R., and Utell, M.J., 2014. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhalation toxicology, 26 (13), 811–828.
- Moons, K.G., et al., 2015. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine, 162 (1), W1–W73.
- Ochodo, E.A., et al., 2013. Overinterpretation and misreporting of diagnostic accuracy studies: evidence of spin. Radiology, 267 (2), 581–258. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23360738
- Pepe, M. S., 2003. Study design and hypothesis testing. In: The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 214–251.
- Royal Statistical Society, (2021) Royal statistical society working group on diagnostic tests report.
- Royston, P., Altman, D.G., and Sauerbrei, W., 2006. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Statistics in medicine, 25 (1), 127–141.
- Rutjes, A.W., et al., 2006. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ: Canadian medical association journal, 174 (4), 469–476.
- Simes, R.J., 1986. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. Journal of clinical oncology, 4 (10), 1529–1541.
- Trevethan, R., 2017. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values: foundations, liabilities, and pitfalls in research and practice. Frontiers in public health, 5, 307.
- US FDA, (2007) Guidance on reporting results from studies evaluating diagnostic tests. https://www.fda.gov/media/71147/download
- Usher-Smith, J.A., Sharp, S.J., and Griffin, S.J., 2016. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 353, i3139.
- Whiting, P.F., et al., 2011. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of internal medicine, 155 (8), 529–536.
- Whiting, P.F., et al., 2013. A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 66 (10), 1093–1104.
- World Health Organization, 2005. Handbook for good clinical research practice (GCP): guidance for implementation. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43392
- Yordanov, Y., et al., 2015. Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials. BMJ (clinical research ed.), 350, h809.
- Zhou, X. H., McClish, D. K., and Obuchowski, N. A., 2002. statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons.