Towards democratic and effective forest governance? The discursive legitimation of forest certification in northern Sweden

References

• Arts, B., and Buizer, M. 2009. Forests, discourses, institutions – a discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5–6), 340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. 2006. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16 (5), 290–306. doi: 10.1002/eet.425
   Google Scholar
• Bay-Larsen, I. 2012. The constitution of power in Norway's protected areas: on shore and in the sea. Local Environment, 17 (3), 331–347. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.665862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 1991. The legitimation of power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. 2011. Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance. Review of International Political Economy, 18 (1), 17–51. doi: 10.1080/09692290903173087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., and Cashore, B. 2007. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation and Governance, 1 (4), 347–371. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2 (2), 137–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M. 2003. How state-dependent is a non-state-driven rule-making project? The case of forest certification in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (2), 165–180. doi: 10.1080/1523908032000121184
   Google Scholar
• Boström, M. 2012. The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 19 (1), 3–15. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2011.582891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashore, B., Auld, G., and Newsom, D. 2004. Governing through markets – forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, S., and Pattberg, P. 2008. Private rule-making and the politics of accountability: analyzing global forest governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (3), 103–121. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• County Administrative Board of Västerbotten, 2012a. Skogen – drygt halva Västerbotten. Available from: http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vasterbotten/Sv/miljo-och-klimat/tillstandet-i-miljon/skog/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed 3 February 2012].
   Google Scholar
• County Administrative Board of Västerbotten, 2012b. County Administrative Board of Västerbotten. Available from: http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vasterbotten/En/Pages/default.aspx [Accessed 3 February 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K. 2007. The new transnationalism – transnational governance and democratic legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency and Statistics Sweden, 2010. Protected nature 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI0603/2010A01/MI0603_2010A01_SM_MI41SM1101.pdf [Accessed 3 February 2012].
   Google Scholar
• FSC International, 2011. FSC facts & figures. Available from: http://www.fsc.org/facts-figures.html [Accessed 9 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L.H. 2005. Sustainable forestry in Sweden: the effect of competition among private certification schemes. The Journal of Environment and Development, 14 (3), 338–355. doi: 10.1177/1070496505280061
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L.H. 2008. Accountability arrangements in non-state standards organizations: instrumental design and imitation. Organization, 15 (4), 563–583. doi: 10.1177/1350508408091007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., and Versteeg, W. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7 (3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. 2009. Discourse as ideology: neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5–6), 319–325. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries, S.S., and Kainer, K.A. 2006. Local perceptions of forest certification for community-based enterprises. Forest Ecology and Management, 235 (1–3), 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.07.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, J. 2012. Challenges to the legitimacy of private forest governance – the development of forest certification in Sweden. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22 (6), 424–436. doi: 10.1002/eet.1591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jougda, L., et al., 2011. Upprättade renbruksplaner 2005-2010. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency, Rapport 6.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2008a. Climate change and globalization in the Arctic – an integrated approach to vulnerability assessment. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2008b. Konflikter mellan rennäring och skogsbruk i Sverige. In: C. Sandström, S. Hovik and E.I. Falleth, eds. Omstridd natur – trender och utmaningar i nordisk naturresursförvaltning. Umeå: Boréa Bokförlag, 248–268.
   Google Scholar
• Keskitalo, E.C.H.et al. 2009. Local consequences of applying international norms: differences in the application of forest certification in Northern Sweden, Northern Finland and Northwest Russia. Ecology and Society, 14 (2), 1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantto, P., and Mörkenstam, U. 2008. Sami rights and Sami challenges. The modernization process and the Swedish Sami movement, 1886-2006. Scandinavian Journal of History, 33 (1), 26–51. doi: 10.1080/03468750701431222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malets, O., 2011. From transnational voluntary standards to local practices. A case study of forest certification in Russia. Cologne: MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/7.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, C.L. 2012. Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: a case study of the FSC in British Columbia. Geoforum, 43 (3), 634–644. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidinger, E. 2011. Forest certification and democracy. European Journal of Forest Research, 13 (3), 407–419. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0426-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture 2003. Renägare och renskötselföretag – Rennäringens struktur 1994-2001. Stockholm: Ministry of Agriculture and Statistics Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Moen, J., and Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2010. Interlocking panarchies in multi-use boreal forests in Sweden. Ecology and Society, 15 (3), 17
   Google Scholar
• PEFC International, 2011. PEFC global certification: forest management & chain of custody [online]. Available from: http://pefc.org/resources/webinar/item/801 [Accessed 9 January 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and Peters, B.G. 2005. Governing complex societies – trajectories and scenarios. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J.C., and Peluso, N.L. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociology, 68 (2), 153–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge, A., Bouthillier, L., and Mercier, J. 2011. The gap between theory and reality of governance: the case of forest certification in Quebec (Canada). Society and Natural Resources, 24 (7), 656–671. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2010.483244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P.A.et al. 2005. Collaborative approaches to watershed management. In: P. A. Sabatieret al., eds. Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge: MIT Press, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, M. 2013. Credibility at stake – how FSC Sweden fails to safeguard forest biodiversity. Stockholm: Swedish Society for Nature Conservation.
   Google Scholar
• Sámi Information Centre, 2010. Samerna i siffror. Available from: http://www.samer.se/1536 [Accessed 6 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Sámi Parliament, 2011. Rennäringen i Sverige. Available from: http://www.sametinget.se/1126 [Accessed 6 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, C., 2004. Samråd mellan rennäring och skogsbruk – ett exempel på samförvaltning av gemensamma resurser? Umeå: FjällMistrarapport nr. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, C., and Widmark, C. 2007. Stakeholders’ perceptions of consultations as tools for co-management – a study of the forestry and reindeer herding sectors in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 10 (1–2), 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F.W. 1999. Governing in Europe – effective and democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. 2003. The legitimation of international governance: a discourse approach. European Journal of International Relations, 9 (2), 249–275. doi: 10.1177/1354066103009002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. 2009. Discursive legitimation in environmental governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5–6), 313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency 2011. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry. Jönköping: Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forests Industries Federation, 2011. The Swedish Forests Industries Federation – facts and figures 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.forestindustries.se/documentation/facts_and_figures [Accessed 6 June 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish FSC Council 2010. Swedish FSC Standard for Forest Certification including SLIMF indicators. Uppsala: Swedish FSC Council.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish PEFC Board 2012. Svensk PEFC Skogsstandard 2012-2017. Uppsala: Swedish PEFC Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tamm Hallström, K., and Boström, M. 2010. Transnational multi-stakeholder standardization. Organizing fragile non-state authority. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, S., and Wyatt, S. 2013. Is forest certification delivering on first nation issues? The effectiveness of the FSC standard in advancing First Nations’ rights in the boreal forests of Ontario and Quebec, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 27, 23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikina, A.V.et al. 2010. Aboriginal peoples and forest certification: a review of the Canadian situation. Ecology and Society, 15 (3), 33–.
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, A., 2009. Commons protected for or from the people – co-management in the Swedish mountain region? Academic dissertation. Umeå: Department of Political Science, Umeå University.
   Google Scholar