Governing Quasi-Public Network Services for adaptation to climate change

References

• Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J., 1992. Responsive regulation. trancending the deregulation debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartle, I., 2011. Utility regulation and NPM. In: T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, eds. The ashgate research companion to new public management. Farnham: Ashgate, 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., 2011. Adaptation to climate change by organizations. WIREs Climate Change, 3 (1), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., and Gann, D.M., 2006. Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Climatic Change, 78 (1), 135–156. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9089-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladh, M., 2002. En elektrisk historie. Elsystemets och elanvändingens utveckling i Sverige[An electrical history. Developments in the electricity use and system in Sweden]. Lindköping: University of Lindköping.
   Google Scholar
• Bye, T. and Hope, E., 2006. Electricity market reform – the Norwegian experience. In: L. Sørgard, ed. Competition and welfare: the Norwegian experience. Bergen: Norwegian Competition Authority, 21–50.
   Google Scholar
• Chatman, J.A., et al., 1998. Being different yet feeling similar: the influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43 (4), 749–780. doi: 10.2307/2393615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., 2001a. New public management: the transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., 2001b. New public management: the effects of contractualism and devolution on political control. Public Administration Review, 3 (1), 73–94.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., 2007a. Introduction –theoretical approach and research questions. In: T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, eds. Trancending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms. Hampshire: Ashgate, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Lægreid, P., 2007b. Transending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms. Hampshire: Ashgate, 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. and Peters, B.G., 1999. Structure, culture, and governance: a comparison of Norway and the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lie, A., and Lægreid, P., 2007. Still fragmented government or reassertion of the centre? In: T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, eds. Trancending new public management. The transformation of public sector reforms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Claes, D.H. and Mydske, P.K., 2011. Forretning eller fordeling? Reform av offentlig nettverkstjenester. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Damsgaard, N. and Green, R., 2005. Den Nya Elmarknaden. Fråmgang eller Misslyckande? Stockholm: SNS forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1983. Risk and culture. An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• E.ON, 2010. Stora effekter av E.ONs investeringsprojekt Krafttag [Large effects of E.ONs investment project Krafttag]. E.ON 2010. Available from: http://www.eon.se/templates/Eon2TextPage.aspx?id=60316&epslanguage=SV [Accessed 30 November 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Eakin, H., et al., 2011. Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. Environmental Management, 47 (3), 338–351. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9605-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurelectric, 2011. Regulation for smart grids. Brussels: Eurelectric.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.L. and Bennett, A., 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P. and Kaijser, A., 2007. När folkhemselen blev internationell. Elavgleringen i historiskt perspektiv. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T.H., 2011. Institutional constraints to adaptive capacity: adaptability to climate change in the Norwegian electricity sector. Local Environment, 16 (4), 303–317. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.569538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T.H., forthcoming. Change in organization and culture – changed adaptive capacity? In: K. O'Brien and E. Selboe, eds. Adapting to change: integral approaches to climate change responses in Norway. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T.H. and Eikeland, P.O., 2009. Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints. In: W.N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, and K. O'Brien, eds. Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433–447.
   Google Scholar
• Inderberg, T.H. and Løchen, L.A., 2012. Adaptation to climate change among electricity distribution companies in Norway and Sweden: lessons from the field. Local Environment, 17 (6–7: Special Issue on Nordic Climate Change), 663–678. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.646971
   Google Scholar
• Jamasb, T. and Söderberg, M., 2010. The effects of average norm model regulation: the case of electricity distribution in Sweden. Review of Industrial Organization, 36 (3), 249–269. doi: 10.1007/s11151-010-9246-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J.W., 1995. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison, Wesley, Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Langset, T., 2007. Effektiviseringsanalyser i reguleringen av nettselskapene. In: J. Moen and S. Sivertsen, eds. Et kraftmarked blir til. Et tilbakeblikk på den norske kraftmarkedreformen. Oslo: NVE, 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Langset, T., et al., 2001. Quality dependent revenue caps – a model for quality of supply regulation. In: CIRED. 16th international conference and exhibition on (IEE Conf. Publ No. 482), IEE Conference Publication, London.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., 2007. A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (2), 289–307. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1989. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M.D. and Page, T., 1987. A theory of congressional delegation. In: M.D. McCubbins and T. Sullivan, eds. Congress: structure and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K., 1996. On social structure and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. and Rowan, B., 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midttun, A., 1995. (Mis)understanding change. Electricity liberalization policies in Norway and Sweden. In: A. Kaijser and M. Hedin, eds. Nordic energy systems. Historical perspectives and current issues. Canton, MA: Science History Publications USA, 141–168.
   Google Scholar
• Midttun, A. and Summerton, J., 1998. Loyalty or competition? A comparative analysis of Norwegian and Swedish electricity distributors’ adaptation to market reform. Energy Policy, 26 (2), 143–158. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00139-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, Y. and Thue, L., 2006. Statens kraft 1965–2006. Miljø og marked. Vol. III. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., 2005. Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning, 23 (2), 207–226. doi: 10.1068/c0405j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU, 2000: 24. Et sårbart samfunn. Oslo: Justis- og politidepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• NOU, 2010: 10. Tilpassing til eit klima i endring. Samfunnet si sårbarheit og behov for tilpassing til konsekvensar av klimaendringane [Adaptation to climate change. Society's vulnerability and the need for adaptation to the consequences of climate change]. Oslo: Green Paper, Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• NVE, 2010. Klimatilpasning innen NVEs ansvarsområder – Strategi 2010–2014. Oslo: NVE.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K., et al., 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7 (1), 73–88. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, P.I., 2000. Transforming economies. The case of the Norwegian electricity market reform. Oslo: Norwegian School of Management BI.
   Google Scholar
• Oppermann, E., 2011. The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK climate impacts programme: de-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Climate and Development, 3, 71–85. doi: 10.3763/cdev.2010.0061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, M., 2001. Policy capacity and the effects of new public management. In: T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, eds. New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, J., 2008. Emergency management in the Swedish electricity market: the need to challenge the responsibility gap. Energy Policy, 36 (2), 843–849. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, M., 2008. Foreword: liberalization and regulation in electricity systems –how can we get the balance right? In: F.P. Sioshansi, ed. Competitive electricity markets. Design, implementation, performance. Amsterdam: Elsevier, xvii–xxiv.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K., 2001. National, international and transnational constructions of new public management. In: T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, eds. New public management. The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 43–72.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 2008. Institutions and organizations. Ideas and interests. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Self, P., 2000. Rolling back the market: economic dogma end political choice. New York: St. Martin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P., 1957. Leadership in administration. A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., 2008. Audit culture and illiberal governance. Antropological Theory, 8 (3), 278–299. doi: 10.1177/1463499608093815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjold, D.O., 2009. Power for generations. Statkraft and the role of the state in Norwegian electrification. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, M., 2008. Four essays on efficiency in Swedish electricity distribution. Gothenburg: Department of Business Administration, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway, 2010. Electricity statistic 2010 [online]. Available from: http://www.ssb.no/elektrisitetaar/tab-2010-05-26-01.html [Accessed 8 December 2010].
   Google Scholar
• Statskontoret, 2004. Avregleringen av sex marknader. Del II, Kartleggningar [The deregulation of six markets. Part II, Mapping]. Stockholm: Statskontoret ( in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency, 2007. Utvärdering av stormen Per. Konsekvenser och lärdomar för en tryggare energiforsörjning [Evaluation of the storm Per. consequences and learning for a more secure energy supply]. Eskilstuna: Energimyndigheten.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H., 2004. Markets from culture. Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W.O., 2008. Institutional logics. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, eds. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 99–129.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A.L. and Ouchi, W.G., 1983. Efficient cultures: exploring the relationship between culture and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (3), 468–481. doi: 10.2307/2392253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar