The distribution of environmentally related well-being: a conceptual framework

References

• Acheson, J., 2006. Public access to privately owned land in Maine. Maine Policy Review, 15 (1), 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C., 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27 (4), 629–649. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. and Ostrom, E., 2001. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society, 29 (4), 485–514. doi: 10.1177/0032329201029004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbier, E.B., Markandya, A., and Pearce, D., 1990. Environmental sustainability and cost–benefit analysis. Environment and Planning A, 22 (9), 1259–1266. doi: 10.1068/a221259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, R., 2006. Economics and power: an inquiry into human relations and markets. Cambidge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. and Oates, W., 1988. The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G., 1983. A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98 (3), 371–400. doi: 10.2307/1886017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Been, V., 1992–1993. What's fairness got to do with it? Environmental justice and the siting of locally undesirable land uses. Cornell Law Review, 78 (6), 1001–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, J.K., 2002. The political economy of the environment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., 2003. Introduction. In: J. Boyce and B. Shelley, eds. Natural assets: democratizing ownership of nature. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, J., 2007. Is inequality bad for the environment? In: W. Freudenberg, ed. Equity and the environment research in social problems and public policy. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 267–289.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. and Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63 (2–3), 616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, H., Verba, S., and Schlozman, K.L., 1995. Beyond SES: a resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89 (2), 271–294. doi: 10.2307/2082425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, N. and Sethi, R., 1997. The distribution of pollution: community characteristics and exposure to air toxics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32 (2), 233–250. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1996.0967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullard, R.D., 1993. Confronting environmental racism: voices from the grassroots. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R., 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (October), 1–44. doi: 10.1086/466560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coastal Enterprises, Inc., 2002. Preserving commercial fishing access: a study of working waterfronts in 25 Maine communities. Portland, ME: Coastal Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Daigle, K., 2012. Accounting for natural wealth gains world traction. AP News, 16 June.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. and Farley, J., 2010. Ecological economics: principles and applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deily, M. and Gray, W., 1991. Enforcement of pollution regulations in a declining industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 21 (3), 260–274. doi: 10.1016/0095-0696(91)90030-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, R., 1977. Incidence of the benefits and costs of environmental programs. American Economic Review, 67 (1), 333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, J. and Duncan, N., 2001. The aestheticization of the politics of landscape preservation. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91 (2), 387–409. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Serafy, S., 1991. The environment as capital. In: Costanza, ed. Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 168–175.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Information Association, 2011. Canada [online]. Country Analysis Briefs. April. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/cabs/canada/Full.html [Accessed 26 June 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Working Group, 2006. Stolen inventory (California): about the TRI [online]. April. Environmental Working Group: The Power of Information. Available from: http://www.ewg.org/node/19711 [Accessed 9 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Farber, S.C., Costanza, R., and Wilson, M., 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41 (3), 375–392. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, B., 2005. Natural resource economics: an introduction. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, R., 1986. Social movements and the state: the environmental movement, countermovement, and government agencies. Sociological Perspectives, 29 (2), 202–240. doi: 10.2307/1388959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J., 1993. Politics and social costs: estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities. The Rand Journal of Economics, 24 (1), 101–125. doi: 10.2307/2555955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J., 1995. Testing for environmental racism: prejudice, profits, political power? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14 (1), 107–132. doi: 10.2307/3325435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N. and Splash, C., 1993. Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162 (3859), 1243–1248.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., 2006. Environmental and natural resource economics: a contemporary approach. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Hershenberg, J., 2001. Pursuing environmental justice through the courts: an overview of the process and why it has failed. El Paso, TX: Institute for Policy and Economic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., 2007. Reflections on the bundle of rights. Vermont Law Review, 32, 247–242.
   Google Scholar
• Keiner, M., 2005. Re-emphasizing sustainable development – the concept of “evolutionability”. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6 (4), 379–392. doi: 10.1007/s10668-005-5737-4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. and Neves, B., 2009. Rural poverty and natural resources: improving access and sustainable management. New York: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., et al., 2012. Drivers and socioeconomic impacts of tourism participation in protected areas. PLoS ONE, 7 (4), e35420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., 2011. Incorporating distributional issues into benefit cost analysis: why, how, and two empirical examples using non-market valuation. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2 (1), Article 5.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Feiock, R., and Ramirez de la Cruz, E., 2009. Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (3), 649–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00392.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcouiller, D., 1998. Environmental resources as latent primary factors of production in tourism: the case of forest-based commercial recreation. Tourism Economics, 4 (2), 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Marcouiller, D., 2008. Distribution of income from tourism sensitive employment. Tourism Economics, 14 (3), 545–565. doi: 10.5367/000000008785633622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcouiller, D., Kim, K.-K., and Deller, S., 2004. Natural amenities, tourism, and income distribution. Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (4), 1031–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinakos, M., 2012. A mighty wind: the turbulent times of America's first offshore wind farm and the inverse of environmental justice. Environmental and Earth Law Journal [online], 2 (1), n.p. Available from: http://lawpublications.barry.edu/ejejj/vol2/iss1/5 [Accessed 10 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J., 2004. Qualitative research design. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, K., 1997. Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environment and Development Economics, 2 (4), 383–399. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X9700020X
   Google Scholar
• Mehlum, H., Moene, K., and Torvik, R., 2002. Institutions and the resource curse. Oslo, Norway: Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, H.A. and Ehrlich, P., 1997. Ecosystem services: a fragmentary history. In: G. Daily, ed. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service, 2012. Fees and reservations [online]. Acadia National Park, Maine. 31 October. Available from: http://www.nps.gov/acad/planyourvisit/feesandreservations.htm [Accessed 31 October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Neidell, M., 2004. Air pollution, health, and socio-economic status: the effect of outdoor air quality on childhood asthma. Journal of Health Economics, 23 (6), 1209–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2002. Glossary of statistical terms. OECD.Stat Extracts. 3 January. Available from: http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=3215 [Accessed 25 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2008. Natural resources and pro-poor growth. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, M., Sadd, J., and Hipp, J., 2001. Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23 (1), 1–31. doi: 10.1111/0735-2166.00072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., 2003. Conceptual framework for analysing the distributive impacts of environmental policies. Geneva, Switzerland: OECD. 4 March. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/28/63/38435759.pdf [Accessed 30 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Power, T.M., 1996. Lost landscapes and failed economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, T.M., 2006. The supply and demand for natural amenities: an overview of theory and concepts. In: G.P. Green, S. Deller, and D. Marcouiller, eds. Amenities and rural development: theory, methods, and public policy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J., 1998. Theorizing access: forest profits along Senegal's charcoal commodity chain. Development and Change, 29 (2), 307–341. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. and Warner, A., 2001. The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45 (4–6), 827–838. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00125-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, W., 2002. Ecology, justice, and the end of development. In: J. Byrne, L. Glover, and C. Martinez, eds. Environmental justice: discourses in international political economy. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction, 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sadd, J., et al., 1999. “Every breath you take”: the demographics of toxic releases in Southern California. Economic Development Quarterly, 13 (2), 107–123. doi: 10.1177/089124249901300201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 2000. The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (S2), 931–952. doi: 10.1086/468100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, R., Deller, S., and Marcouiller, D., 2004. Community economics: linking theory and practice. 2nd ed. Ames, IA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M., 2005. Equity and information: information regulation, environmental justice, and risks from toxic chemicals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24 (2), 373–398. doi: 10.1002/pam.20094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V.K., 1977. Residential location and environmental amenities: a review of the evidence. Regional Studies, 11 (1), 46–72.
   Google Scholar
• Soderbaum, P., 2006. Democracy and sustainable development: what is the alternative to cost–benefit analysis? Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2 (2), 182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R., 1993. Sustainability: an economist's perspective. In: R. Dorfam and N. Dorfman, eds. Economics of the environment: selected readings. New York, NY: Norton, 179–187.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L.O. and Smith, V.K., 2000. Environmental amenities as a source of market power. Land Economics, 76 (4), 550–568. doi: 10.2307/3146952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teitenberg, T. and Lewis, L., 2009. Environmental economics & policy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C., 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64 (5), 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbull, W., 1990. Who has standing in cost-benefit analysis? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9 (2), 201–218. doi: 10.2307/3325412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, R.K., 2001. The place of economic values in environmental valuation. In: I.J. Bateman, ed. Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–41.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme, 2011. Sustainability and equity: a better future for all. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Statistics Division and United Nations Environment Programme, 2003. Handbook of national accounting – integrated environmental and economic accounting (draft). New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2012. Mercury and air toxics Standard: basic information [online]. April 10. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/powerplanttoxics/basic.html [Accessed 10 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Vail, D. and Hultkrantz, L., 2000. Property rights and sustainable nature tourism: adaptation and mal-adaptation in Dalarna (Sweden) and Maine (USA). Ecological Economics, 35 (2), 223–242. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00190-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, R., 1987. The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11 (2), 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., et al., 2005. Industrial pollution and social deprivation: evidence and complexity in evaluating and responding to social inequality. Local Environment, 10 (4), 361–377. doi: 10.1080/13549830500160842
   Google Scholar
• Wenar, L., 2008. Property rights and the resource curse. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36 (1), 2–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. and Hanink, D., 2004. “Moderate” environmental amenities and economic change: the nonmetropolitan Northern Forest of the Northeast U.S., 1970–2000. Growth and Change, 35 (1), 42–60. doi: 10.1111/j.0017-4815.2004.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodard, C., 2013. For regulators and Nestle Waters, conflict by the gallon. Portland Press Herald, 3 Sept, p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Xepapadeas, A., 2005. Economic growth and the environment. In: K.-G. Maler and J. Vincent, eds. Handbook of environmental economics: valuing environmental changes, New York, NY: Elsevier Science, 1219–1271.
   Google Scholar