Parsing participation: models of engagement for outcomes monitoring in urban stewardship

References

• Allen, W., et al., 2001. Monitoring and adaptive management: resolving social and organisational issues to improve information sharing in natural resource management. Natural Resources Forum, 25 (3), 225–233. doi:10.1111/j.1477-8947.2001.tb00764.x
   Google Scholar
• Argent, R.M., 2009. Components of adaptive management. In: C. Allan and G.H. Stankey, eds. Adaptive environmental management: a practitioner's guide. 1st ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Berkes, F., and Doubleday, N., eds., 2008a. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D.R., et al., 2008b. Adaptive co-management for social–ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (2), 95–102. doi:10.1890/070089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., and Plummer, R., 2008c. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18 (1), 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R., 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley, T. and Manning, K., 1997. The ecology of place: planning for environment, economy and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., 2007. Adaptive co-management and complexity: exploring the many faces of co-management. In: F. Berkes, D.R. Armitage, and N. Doubleday, eds. Adaptive co-management collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance [online]. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 19–37. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/id/10203177 [Available 28 September 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (5), 1692–1702. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidwell, D., 2009. Is community-based participatory research postnormal science? Science, Technology & Human Values, 34 (6), 741–761. doi: 10.1177/0162243909340262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö. and Crona, B.I., 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19 (3), 366–374. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., et al., 2009a. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. Washington, DC: CAISE.
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R., et al., 2009b. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59 (11), 977–984. doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, A., 2013. The incidental steward: reflections on citizen science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, F.S., et al., 2011. Earth stewardship: science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere, 2 (8), art89. doi:10.1890/ES11-00166.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, A., 2008. Adaptive co-management for resilient resource systems. In: D. Armitage, F. Berkes, and N. Doubleday, eds. Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Reynolds, K., and Sanghvi, R., 2012. Five borough farm: seeding the future of urban agriculture in New York city. New York City: Design Trust for Public Space.
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., 2005. Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J.F., 1999. The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallie, W.B., 1955. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
   Google Scholar
• Gaston, K.J., 2010. Urban ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gittelman, M., 2010. Farming concrete 2010 report [online]. Farming Concrete. Available from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/53285030/FC-2010-Report [Available 9 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hellawell, J.M., 1991. Development of a rationale for monitoring. In: F.B. Goldsmith, ed. Monitoring for conservation and ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M., 2004. Cities and natural process. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krasny, M.E. and Tidball, K.G., 2012. Civic ecology: a pathway for Earth Stewardship in cities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (5), 267–273. doi:10.1890/110230
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, N.J., Kleine, D.A., and Dean, A.J., 2012. CoralWatch: education, monitoring, and sustainability through citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (6), 332–334. doi:10.1890/110266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., and Grove, J.M., 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69 (4), 369–384. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., 2009. The adaptive co-management process: an initial synthesis of representative models and influential variables. Ecology and Society [online], 14 (2), 24. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art24/ [Accessed 2 September 2013].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, K., 2013. Innovative iTree spreads worldwide. USDA Blog [online]. 21 March. Available from: http://blogs.usda.gov/2013/03/21/innovative-i-tree-spreads-worldwide/ [Available 22 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (2), 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruitenbeek, J. and Cartier, C., 2001. The invisible wand: adaptive co-management as an emergent strategy in complex bio-economic systems. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, J., et al., 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology & Society [online], 17 (2). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229 [Available 22 October 2013]. doi: 10.5751/ES-04705-170229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P. and Krasny, M., 2013. Outcomes monitoring within civic ecology practices in the NYC region [online]. Cornell University Civic Ecology Lab. Available from: http://civeco.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/silva-2013.pdf [Available 9 October 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Silvertown, J., 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24 (9), 467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbé, J.F. de L.G., 2005. An overview of the social value of long-term monitoring. In: J.F. de L.G. Solbé, ed. Long-term monitoring: why, what, where, when & how? Cork: Sherkin Island Marine Station, 44–50.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, E. and Campbell, L., 2008. Urban ecological stewardship: understanding the structure, function and network of community-based urban land management. Cities and the Environment (CATE) [online], 1 (1). Available from: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol1/iss1/4 [Available 13 August 2013].
   Google Scholar
• United States Forest Service, n.d. STEW-MAP: The Stewardship Mapping and Assessment Project [online]. Available from: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/nyc/focus/stewardship_mapping/ [Accessed 9 November 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C.J. and Holling, C.S., 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71 (6), 2060–2068. doi:10.2307/1938620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar