Embracing sustainability: the incorporation of sustainability principles in municipal planning and policy in four mid-sized municipalities in Ontario, Canada

References

• Alshuwaikhat, H.M., and Aina, Y.A., 2005. Sustainable planning: the need for strategic environmental assessment-based municipal planning in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7 (3), 387–405. doi: 10.1142/S1464333205002092
   Google Scholar
• AMO, 2007. Integrated community sustainability plan backgrounder [online]. Toronto: Association of Municipalities of Ontario. Available from: http://www.amo.on.ca/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Integrated_Community_Sustainability_Plan&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=150951
   Google Scholar
• AMO, 2008. A sustainability planning toolkit for municipalities in Ontario. Toronto: Association of Municipalities of Ontario (report prepared by the Blackstone Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• AUMA, 2006. Comprehensive guide for municipal sustainability planning. Edmonton: Alberta Urban Municipalities Association, 113.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A. and Hjorth, P., 2007. Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustainable Development, 15 (2), 83–96. doi: 10.1002/sd.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B.L., 2009. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, J., et al., 2001. Community-based ecosystem monitoring. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 12 (3–4), 143–167. doi: 10.1300/J091v12n03_07
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, B.T., et al., 2007. Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: did some rubber hit the road? Bioscience, 57 (2), 186–191. doi: 10.1641/B570213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2), 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• van der Brugge, R., Rotmans, J., and Loorbach, D., 2005. The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change, 5 (4), 164–176. doi: 10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burlington, 2010. City of Burlington: green buildings [online]. Burlington: City of Burlington. Available from: http://cms.burlington.ca/Page7917.aspx [Accessed 18 December 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Cuthill, M., 2000. An interpretive approach to developing volunteer-based coastal monitoring programmes. Local Environment, 5 (2), 127–137. doi: 10.1080/13549830050009300
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, R.S., et al., 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7 (3), 260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, B., et al., 2006. Governing local sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49 (6), 849–867. doi: 10.1080/09640560600946875
   Google Scholar
• FCM, 2011. Policy statement on environmental issues and sustainable development. Ottawa: Federation of Canadian Municipalities.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E., 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finco, A. and Nijkamp, P., 2001. Pathways to urban sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3 (4), 289–302. doi: 10.1002/jepp.94
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.B., 2001. Specification of sustainability-based environmental assessment decision criteria and implications for determining “significance” in environmental assessment [online]. Vancouver,: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Research and Development Programme. Available from: http://static.twoday.net/NE1BOKU0607/files/Gibson_Sustainability-EA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.B., 2005. Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.B., 2006a. Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24 (3), 170–182. doi: 10.3152/147154606781765147
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.B. 2006b. Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8 (3), 259–280. doi: 10.1142/S1464333206002517
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 1996. Consensus-building across difficult divisions: new approaches to collaborative strategy making. Planning Practice and Research, 11 (2), 207–216. doi: 10.1080/02697459650036350
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 1998. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30 (9), 1531–1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 2004. Creativity and urban governance. Policy Studies, 25 (2), 87–102. doi: 10.1080/0144287042000262189
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, Y. and Fletcher, A., 2011. Report on the Union of Nova Scotia municipalities sustainability office's sustainability survey. Nova Scotia: Union of Nova Scotia Municipalities.
   Google Scholar
• Hvenegaard, G., 2012. Community-based factors influencing the development and content of integrated community sustainability plans in rural Alberta and Canada. Alberta: Alberta Rural Development Network.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J.E., 1996. Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62 (4), 460–472. doi: 10.1080/01944369608975712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN, 1980. World conservation strategy: living resource conservation for sustainable development. Gland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.B., et al., 2000. Green structure and sustainability – developing a tool for local planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52 (2–3), 117–133. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00127-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Parto, S., Gibson, Robert B., 2005. Governance for sustainable development: moving from theory to practice. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8 (1/2), 12–30. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.2005.007372
   Google Scholar
• Kenworthy, J.R., 2006. The eco-city: ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment & Urbanization, 18 (1), 67–85. doi: 10.1177/0956247806063947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, 2010. Sustainable Kingston: designing our community's future … Together. Kingston: City of Kingston.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, P., 2009. Best practices scan of sustainability: decision-making and planning for the municipal sector. Ottawa: The Natural Step, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., et al., 2007. Integrated community sustainability planning tool British Columbia. Victoria, BC: Royal Roads University .
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Hanna, K., and Dale, Ann, 2009. A template for integrated community sustainability planning. Environmental Management, 44, 228–242. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9315-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, C.o., 2004. Smart growth & placemaking in London: proposed demonstration project [online]. London: City of London. Available from: http://www.clear.london.ca/pdf/SmartGrowthReport_2004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Feiock, R., and Handy, S, 2009. City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California's Central Valley. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75 (3), 293–308. doi: 10.1080/01944360902952295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Malmborg, F., 2003. Environmental management systems: what is in it for local authorities? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5 (1), 3–21. doi: 10.1080/15239080305605
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, K., 2011. Planning sustainability: intergenerational and intragenerational justice in spatial planning strategies. Antipode, 44 (1), 197–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00854.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, 2011. Greenprint: Markham's Sustainability Plan. Markham: Town of Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, J.R., et al., 2008. Environmental health and vulnerable populations in Canada: mapping an integrated equity-focused research agenda. Canadian Geographer, 52 (4), 427–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2008.00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattare, M., et al., 2012. A new small city business incubator: a business community's attitudes and desired services. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 8 (1), 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D.D., et al., 2006. Sustainability, social learning and the long point world biosphere reserve. Environments, 34 (2), 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• MEAB, 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment [online]. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Board, Washington: Island Press. Available from: http://pdf.wri.org/ecosystems_human_wellbeing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, D.H., et al., 1972. The limits to growth. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, W., 2007. Negotiating a place for “sustainability” policies in municipal planning and governance: the role of scalar discourses and practices. Space and Polity, 11 (1), 95–119. doi: 10.1080/13562570701406683
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders, A., and Therivel, R., 2006. Sustainability integration and assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8 (13), 281–298. doi: 10.1142/S1464333206002529
   Google Scholar
• Park, C., et al., 2009. Integrated community sustainability planning: a guide. Ottawa: The Natural Step, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário, M.R., et al., 2009. Sustainability assessment for agriculture scenarios in Europe's mountain areas: lessons from six study areas. Environmental managementj. Environmental Management, 43 (1), 144–165.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, J., 2006. Editorial: what's so special about sustainability assessment?. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8 (3), v–x.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., 2004. Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterstrom, K., et al., 2007. Adaptive management: a review and framework for integration with multi-criteria decision analysis. In: G.P. Macey and J. Cannon, ed. Reclaiming the land. New York, NY: Springer, 89–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E.F., 1973. Small is beautiful: economics as if people mattered. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Seasons, M., 2003. Indicators and core area planning: applications in Canada's mid-sized cities. Planning Practice and Research, 18 (1), 63–80. doi: 10.1080/0269745032000132646
   Google Scholar
• Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Relations, 2007. Integrated community sustainability plans: municipal funding agreement for Noval Scotia. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Infrastructure Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. and Wiek, A., 2012. Achievements and opportunities in initiating governance for urban sustainability. Environment and Planning: Part C – Government & Policy, 30 (3), 429–447. doi: 10.1068/c10158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, 2011. Population and dwelling counts, for Canada and census subdivisions (municipalities) with 5,000-plus population, 2011 and 2006 censuses [online]. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available from: http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/hlt-fst/pd-pl/Table-Tableau.cfm?LANG=Eng&T=307&S=11&O=A&RPP=699 [Accessed 16 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P., 1998. Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30 (11), 1975–1989. doi: 10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todes, A., 2004. Regional planning and sustainability: limits and potentials of South Africa's integrated development plans. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47 (6), 843–861. doi: 10.1080/0964056042000284866
   Google Scholar
• UNEP, 1972. United Nations conference on the human environment [online]. Stockholm: United Nations. Available from: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=97 [Accessed 16 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• UNEP, 1992. United Nations sustainable development: Agenda 21 [online]. Rio de Janerio: United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UNEP, 2012. The Future We Want (Rio+20). New York: United Nations Environmental Programme, United Nations General Assembly. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• WCED, 1987. Our common future (world commission on economic development). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitelaw, G.S., et al., 2003. Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 88 (1), 409–418. doi: 10.1023/A:1025545813057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2009. Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van Zeijl-Rozema, A., et al., 2008. Governance for sustainable development: a framework. Sustainable Development, 16 (6), 410–421. doi: 10.1002/sd.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar