Assessing local climate action plans for public health co-benefits in environmental justice communities

References

• Adger, Neil, Paavola, Jouni, Huq, Saleemul, and Mace, Mary Jane, 2006. Fairness in adaptation to climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agyeman, J., Bullad, R.D., and Evans, B., eds., 2003. Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alber, Gotelind and Kern, Kristine, 2008. Governing climate change in cities: modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. In: OECD conference on competitive cities and climate change, 9–10 October Milan, Italy. Available from: https://www1.oecd.org/gov/regional-policy/50594939.pdf [Accessed 5 February 2013], 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• American Lung Association and EDF – Environmental Defense Fund, 2014. Driving California forward public health and societal economic benefits of California's AB 32 transportation fuel policies. San Francisco, CA: EDF.
   Google Scholar
• Anguelovskik, Isabelle and Carmin, JoAnn, 2011. Something borrowed, everything new: innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, F., 2009. Envisioning a healthy and sustainable future: essential to closing the gap in a generation. Global Health Promotion, 16 (1), 271–277.
   Google Scholar
• Bay Area Health Inequities Initiative, 2013. Climate change: what's public health got to do with it? BARHII (Guide (01)).
   Google Scholar
• Bedsworth, Louise, 2008. Climate change and California's local public health agencies. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Bedsworth, Louise, 2009. Preparing for climate change: a perspective from local health officers in California. Environmental Health Perspective, 117, 617–623. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0800114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedsworth, Louise, 2012. California's local health agencies and the state's climate adaptation strategy. Climate Change, 111 (1), 119–133. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0245-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P.R. and Conroy, M.M., 2000. Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 21–33. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, Michael R., Greve, Adrienne I., and Seale, Tammy L., 2010. An assessment of the link between greenhouse gas emissions inventories and climate action plans. Journal of American Planning Association, 76 (4), 451–462. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2010.503313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, James and Pastor, Manuel, 2013. Clearing the air: incorporating air quality and environmental justice into climate policy. Climate Change, 120 (4), 801–814. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0832-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braveman, P.A., 2003. Monitoring equity in health and healthcare: a conceptual framework. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 21 (3), 181–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D.G., et al., 2014. Chapter 13: land use and land cover change. In: J.M. Melillo, T.C. Richmond, and G.W. Yohe, eds. Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. Washington, DC: US Global Change Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Burtraw, Dallas and Toman, Michael, 2000. Ancillary benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation policies. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, Climate Change Issues Brief (7).
   Google Scholar
• California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, 2011. California emissions estimator model – CalEEMod. Available from: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/ [Accessed 3 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board, 2008. AB 32 scoping plan. Available from: http://arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scopingplan.htm [Accessed 2 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board, 2014. Investments to benefit disadvantaged communities: Senate Bill 535 (De Leon, Chapter 830, Statues 2012). Available from: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/auctionproceeds/workshops/arb-sb-535-interim-guidance-08-22-2014.pdf [Accessed 19 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• California Climate Change Assessment, 2012. State of California, Natural Resources Agency.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Justice, 2013. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). State of California. Available from: http://oag.ca.gov/environment/ceqa [Accessed 5 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Public Health, 2010. Health impact assessment of a cap-and-trade framework. Available from: http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32publichealth/cdph_final_hia.pdf [Accessed 10 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Public Health, 2012. Climate action for health: integrating public health into climate action planning. Sacramento, CA. Available from: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/CCDPHP/Documents/CAPS_and_Health_Published3-22-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• California Energy Commission, 2012. Community-based climate adaptation planning: case study of Oakland, California. A White Paper. Pacific Institute and Oakland Climate Action Coalition.
   Google Scholar
• California Environmental Justice Alliance, 2012. Comment letter on Cal EnvironScreen addressed to John B. Faust, Chief, Community Assessment and Research Section, California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• California Environmental Protection Agency, 2014. Draft California communities environmental health screening tool (CalEnviroScreen). Sacramento, CA: State of California.
   Google Scholar
• California Natural Resources Agency, 2012. Cal-Adapt tool. Available from: http://cal-adapt.org/tools/ [Accessed 5 January 2014].
   Google Scholar
• California Strategic Growth Council – SGC, 2013. Sustainable communities planning grant and incentives program. Grant guidelines and application. Sacramento, CA: State of California.
   Google Scholar
• Carmin, JoAnn and Dodman, David, 2013. Engaging science and managing scientific uncertainity in urban climate adaptation planning. In: Susanne Moser and Maxwell Boykoff, eds. Successful adaptation to climate change: linking science and policy in a rapidly changing world. New York: Routledge, 220–234.
   Google Scholar
• City of Lodi, 2014. Climate action plan. Lodi, CA: City of Lodi.
   Google Scholar
• City of Sacramento, 2012. Climate action plan. Available from: http://portal.cityofsacramento.org/Community-Development/Resources/Online-Library/Sustainability
   Google Scholar
• City of San Diego, 2014. Draft climate action plan. San Diego, CA: City of San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• City of Stockton, 2014. Climate action plan. Available from: http://www.stocktongov.com/government/boardCom/clim.html [Accessed 15 December 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, Jason, 2005. Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, Jason, 2009. Cities, climate change and urban heat island mitigation: localising global environmental science. Urban Studies, 46 (2), 413–427. doi: 10.1177/0042098008099361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, S.E. and Oven, K.J., 2012. Geographies of health and climate change. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (5), 654–666. doi: 10.1177/0309132511423350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Defense Fund, 2014. Carbon market California: a comprehensive analysis of the golden state's cap-and-trade program, year one. San Francisco, CA: EDF.
   Google Scholar
• Fann, N., et al., 2012. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Analysis, 32, 81–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01630.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Few, Roger, Brown, Katrina, and Tompkins, Emma, 2007. Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7, 46–59. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firpo, Eric, 2009. A climate change for Tracy growth. Tracy, CA: Tracy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franco, Guido, et al., 2008. Linking climate change science with policy in California. Climate Change, 87, 7–20. doi: 10.1007/s10584-007-9359-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Garrett, 2012. Oakland climate action coalition: toolkit to create climate action in your community. Oakland, CA: Ella Baker Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Solange, 2013. Assessing public health knowledge of climate change and role in climate action. Public presentation to the Climate Action Team Public Health Working Group, State of California, 26 September 2013 meeting, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Governor's Office of Planning and Research, 2011. CEQA and climate change. State of California. Available from: http://www.opr.ca.gov/s_ceqaandclimatechange.php [Accessed 5 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Governor's Office of Planning and Research, 2012. 2012 annual planning survey results. State of California. Available from: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/2012_Annual_Planning_Survey_fullreport.pdf [Accessed 5 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hess, Jeremy J., et al., 2008. Climate change: the importance of place. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (5), 468–478. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Sara, 2013. Justice in urban climate change adaptation: criteria and application to Delhi. Ecology and Society, 18 (4), article number 48, Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol18/iss4/art48/ [Access 15 November 2013]. doi: 10.5751/ES-05929-180448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICELI – Local Government for Sustainability, 2012. What is a sustainability plan? Available from: http://www.icleiusa.org/action-center/planning/ICLEI_What%20Is%20a%20Sustainability%20Plan.pdf [Accessed November 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, E.J., 2004. The adoption of sustainable development policies and techniques in U.S. cities: how wide, how deep, and what role for planners? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, 229–241. doi: 10.1177/0739456X03258638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochem, Eberhard and Madlener, Reinhard, 2003. The forgotten benefits of climate change mitigation: innovation, technological leapfrogging, employment, and sustainable development. Working party on global and structural policies – OECD workshop on the benefits of climate policy: improving information for policymakers.
   Google Scholar
• Kaswan, A., 2012. Climate change, the clean air act, and industrial pollution. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 30 (1), 51–120.
   Google Scholar
• Lerza, C., 2011. Lessons from the defeat of proposition 23. Prepared by for Funders Network for Transforming the Global Economy (FNTG).
   Google Scholar
• Levy, 2014. California once again the world's 8th largest economy. Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy. Available from: http://www.ccsce.com/PDF/Numbers-July-2014-CA-Economy-Rankings-2013.pdf [Accessed 1 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Li, J.C., 2002. Including the feedback of local health improvement in assessing costs and benefits of GHG reduction. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 14, 282–304. doi: 10.1111/1467-940X.00058
   Google Scholar
• London, Jonathan, et al., 2013. Racing climate change: collaboration and conflict in California's global climate change policy arena. Global Environmental Change, 23, 791–799. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, Mark, Feiock, Richard, and Handy, Susan, 2009. City adoption of environmentally sustainable policies in California's Central Valley. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75 (3), 293–308. doi: 10.1080/01944360902952295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E.W., et al., 2010. Reframing climate change as a public health issue. BMC Public Health, 10 (299), 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach, E.W., et al., 2011. Conveying the human implications of climate change: a climate change primer for public health professionals. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, Adam, 2012. The limits to planning: causal impacts of city climate action plans. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33 (1), 5–19. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12449742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morello-Frosch, R., et al., 2011. Understanding the cumulative impacts of inequities in environmental health: implications for policy. Health Affairs, 30 (5), 879–887. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Susanne and Dilling, Lisa, 2007. Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, T., et al., 2012. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Climatic Change, 113 (3–4), 1105–1112. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Defense Council, 2008. Boosting the benefits: improving air quality and health by reducing global warming pollution in California. San Francisco, CA: NRDC and Redefinig Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Nemet, G.F., Holloway, T., and Meier, P., 2010. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environmental Research Letters 5, 014007-1–014007-9. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014007
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, Karen, et al., 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7, 73–88. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastor, Manuel, Shonokoff, Morello-Frosch, and Sadd, Jim, 2009. Minding the climate gap: implications of environmental health inequities for mitigation policies in California. Environmental Justice, 2 (4), 173–177. doi: 10.1089/env.2009.0030
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, Damian, 2010a. Harnessing community energy: the keys to climate mitigation policy adoption in US municipalities. Local Environment, 15 (8), 717–729. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2010.509388
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, Damian, 2010b. The impact of internal and external characteristics on the adoption of climate mitigation policies by US municipalities. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 851–871. doi: 10.1068/c09175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittel, Karen and Rubbelke, Dirk T.G., 2008. Climate policy and ancillary benefits: a survey and investigation into the modeling of international negotiations on climate change. Ecological Economics, 68, 210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Policy Institute of California, 2013. Statewide survey: Californians and the environment. San Francisco, CA: PPIC.
   Google Scholar
• Revi, Aromar, et al., 2014. Urban areas. In: John Balbus and Omar-Dario Cardona, eds. Chapter 8 in Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Vol. 1: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 535–612.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, E.J., 2005. Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: a meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24 (2), 223–247. doi: 10.1002/pam.20088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Joyce Klein and Breechwald, D., 2013. Climate adaptive planning for preventing heat-related health impacts in New York City. Climate Change Governance: Climate Change Management, 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, Cynthia, et al., 2010a. Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature, 467, 909–911. doi: 10.1038/467909a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, D. and Paterson, R.G., 2008. Local government efforts to promote the “Three Es” of sustainable development. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 21–37. doi: 10.1177/0739456X08321803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Francisco Department of Public Health, 2010. Assessing the health co-benefits of San Francisco's climate action plan. San Francisco, CA: Program on Health, Equity and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Todd and Stavins, Robert, 2009. Addressing environmental justice concerns in the design of California's climate policy. Boston, MA: The Analysis Group: Economic, Financial, and Strategy Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• Shonkoff, Seth, et al., 2009. Environmental health and equity impacts from climate change and mitigation policies in California: a review of the literature. Sacramento, CA: California Climate Change Center, California Air Resources Board.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, Rachel, 2004. Consumer citizens and the cities for climate protection campaign. Environment and Planning, 36, 763–782. doi: 10.1068/a36139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K., et al., 2014. Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits. In: Ulisses Confalonieri and Andrew Haines, eds. Chapter 11 in Climate Change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Vol 1: Global and sectoral aspects. Contribution on Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 709–754.
   Google Scholar
• Stavins, Robert, 2011. Why the environmental justice lawsuit against California's climate law is misguided. Grist.org, Climate Policy. Available from: http://grist.org/climate-policy/2011-05-23-environmental-justice-lawsuit-against-californias-climate-law/ [Accessed 5 March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, A. and Meuser, M., 1997. Environmental inequalities: literature review and proposals for new directions in research and theory. Current Sociology, 45 (3), 99–120. doi: 10.1177/001139297045003006
   Google Scholar
• Sze, Julie, et al., 2009. Best in show? Climate and environmental justice policy in California. Environmental Justice, 2 (4), 179–184. doi: 10.1089/env.2009.0028
   Google Scholar
• Tasci, Canan, 2012. Chino council Oks general plan with climate action plan. Daily Bulletin News, 6 July.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Tammy, et al., 2014. A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies. Nature Climate Change, 4, 917–923.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services, 2009. Healthy people 2020 Draft. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012a. Environmental justice definition. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/ [Accessed March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012b. Area designations for 2008 ground-level Ozone standards. Washington, DC: Office of Air and Radiation.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012c. Fine particle (PM 2.5) designations. Washington, DC: Office of Air and Radiation.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012d. Evaluation of the air quality co-benefits of local greenhouse gas reduction measures: a case study of San Francisco. US EPA, Region 9.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Stephen, 2008. State and municipal climate change plans: the first generation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74 (4), 481–496. doi: 10.1080/01944360802377973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Department of Health Services, 2013. Chemical fact sheet – carbon dioxide (CO2). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Department of Health Services.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2003. Case study research design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar