From NIMBY to enlightened resistance: a framework proposal to decrypt land-use disputes based on a landfill opposition case in France

References

• Aitken, M., 2009. Wind power planning controversies and the construction of “expert” and “lay” knowledges. Science as Culture, 18 (1), 47–64. doi: 10.1080/09505430802385682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I. and Low, S., 1992. Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Ellis, G., and Robinson, C., 2008. Cool rationalities and hot air: a rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8 (2), 67–98. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S. and Castro, P., 2015. Collective action and social change: examining the role of representation in the communication between protesters and third-party members. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25 (3), 249–263. doi: 10.1002/casp.2214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S. and Devine-Wright, P., 2015. Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: insights from social representations theory. Public Understanding of Science, 24 (3), 311–325. doi: 10.1177/0963662513514165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity, 17. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D., Gray, T., Haggett, C., and Swaffield, J., 2013. Re-visiting the “social gap”: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics, 22 (1), 115–135. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, M. and Bramrud, T., 2001. Environmental impacts of landfill bioreactor cells in comparison to former landfill techniques. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 29, 289–303. doi: 10.1023/A:1010379409160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondiaux, L., 2001. Démocratie locale et participation citoyenne: la promesse et le piège. Mouvements, 18, 44–51. doi: 10.3917/mouv.018.0044
   Google Scholar
• Botetzagias, I., Malesios, C., Kolokotroni, A., and Moysiadis, Y., 2015. The role of NIMBY in opposing the siting of wind farms: evidence from Greece. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58 (2), 229–251. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2013.851596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1980. Le Sens pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, coll. Le sens commun.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvier, R.A., Halstead, J.M., Conway, K.S., and Manalo, A.B., 2000. The effect of landfills on rural residential property values: some empirical evidence. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 30 (2), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• BRGM, 2004. La nappe des calcaires de Beauce. Service géologique Régional Ile de France et DIREN de bassin Loire-Bretagne. Orléans: Agence de L'eau Loire Bretagne.
   Google Scholar
• Brion, D.J., 1991. Essential industry and the NIMBY phenomenon. New York: Quorum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 1992. Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33 (3), 267–281. doi: 10.2307/2137356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., 2000. Using the language of NIMBY: a topic for research, not an activity for researchers. Local Environment, 5 (1), 55–67. doi: 10.1080/135498300113264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busenberg, G., 1999. Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy. Policy Sciences, 32 (1), 1–11. doi: 10.1023/A:1004414605851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R., 2004. Democratic challenges, democratic choices: the erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M., 1992. Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 141–149. doi: 10.1080/01944369208975808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy, 8 (2), 125–139. doi: 10.1002/we.124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., 2009. Rethinking NIMBYism: the role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 19 (6), 426–441. doi: 10.1002/casp.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., 2010. From backyards to places: public engagement and the emplacement of renewable energy technologies. In: Devine-Wright, ed. Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. London: Earthscan, 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Di Masso, A., Dixon, J., and Pol, E., 2011. On the contested nature of place: “Figuera’s well”, “the hole of shame” and the ideological struggle over public space in Barcelona. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, D., 1997. Energy, society and environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., Barry, J., and Robinson, C., 2007. Many ways to say “no”, different ways to say “yes”: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50 (4), 517–551. doi: 10.1080/09640560701402075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielder, H.M.P., et al., 2000. Assessment of impact on health of residents living near the Nanty-Gwyddon landfill site: retrospective analysis, Br. Medicine Journal, 320, 19–22. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7226.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 1998. Rationality and power: democracy in practice. London: The University of Chicago Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, L.H., 2003. Challenging global environmental governance: social movement agency and global civil society. Global Environmental Politics, 3 (2), 120–134. doi: 10.1162/152638003322068254
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, W. and Pastor, S., 1992. NIMBYs and LULUs, stalking the syndromes. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (4), 39–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01944.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B.S., Oberholzer-Gee, F., and Eichenberger, R., 1996. The old lady visits your backyard: a tale of morals and markets. Journal of Political Economy, 104 (6), 1297–1313. doi: 10.1086/262060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorra-Gobin, C., 2001. Les espaces publics, capital social. Géocarrefour, 76 (1), 5–11. doi: 10.3406/geoca.2001.2499
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, T.A., 2005. NIMBY and the civic good. City and Community, 4 (4), 381–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2005.00144.x
   Google Scholar
• Groothuis, P.A. and Miller, G., 1994. Locating hazardous waste facilities: the influence of NIMBY beliefs. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53 (3), 335–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1994.tb02603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hager, C. and Haddad, M.A. eds., 2015. Nimby is beautiful: cases of local activism and environmental innovation around the world. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haggett, C., 2010. Why not NIMBY? A response, reviewing the empirical evidence. Ethics, Place, and Environment, 13 (3), 313–316. doi: 10.1080/1366879X.2010.528625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heiman, M., 1990. From not in my backyard!’ to not in anybody’s backyard!’ grassroots challenge to hazardous waste facility siting. American Planning Association Journal, 56 (3), 359–362. doi: 10.1080/01944369008975779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo, M.C. and Hernandez, B., 2001. Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 273–281. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2001.0221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. and Leyden, K.M., 1995. Beyond NIMBY: explaining opposition to hazardous waste facilities. Policy Studies Journal, 23 (4), 601–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., 2000. The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, 369–377. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0001900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhaber, H., 1998. Slaying the NIMBY Dragon. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., 1995. Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jobert, A., 1998. L’aménagement en politique ou ce que le syndrome NIMBY nous dit de l’intérêt général. Politix, 42, 67–92. doi: 10.3406/polix.1998.1725
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.J. and Scicchitano, M.J., 2012. Don’t call me NIMBY: Public attitudes toward solid waste facilities. Environment and Behavior, 44 (3), 410–426. doi: 10.1177/0013916511435354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, R., 2000. Siting struggles; the unique challenge of permitting renewable energy power plants. The Electricity Journal, 13, 21–33. doi: 10.1016/S1040-6190(00)00085-3
   Google Scholar
• Kaswan, A., 1997. Environmental justice: bridging the gap between environmental laws and “justice”. American University Law Review, 47 (2), 222–300.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, R.C. and Smith, A.A., 1994. The low-level radioactive waste siting process in Connecticut: anatomy of a failure. Policy Studies Journal, 22 (4), 617–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01493.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M.E. and Clary, B.B., 1991. Citizen participation and the Nimby syndrome: public response to radioactive waste disposal. The Western Political Quarterly, 44 (2), 299–328. University of Utah, Western Political Science Association. doi: 10.2307/448780
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R.W., 1993. Rethinking NIMBY. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59, 87–93. doi: 10.1080/01944369308975847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2003. Un monde pluriel mais commun, entretien avec F. Ewald. La Tour-d'Aigues: Editions de l’Aube, coll. Interventions.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., 2016. On “the subject” of planning’s public interest. Planning Theory. Published on line, 12 January, 2016. doi:10.1177/1473095215621773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. and Scott, M., 2015. Contending expertise: an interpretive approach to (Re) conceiving wind power’s “planning problem”. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17 (5), 593–616. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, W., 2009. Collective action – and then what? Journal of Social Issues, 65, 727–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. and Perkins, D., 2006. Finding common ground: the importance of place attachment to community participation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 335–350. doi: 10.1177/0885412205286160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAvoy, G.E., 1998. Partisan probing and democratic decision making: rethinking the NIMBY syndrome. Policy Studies Journal, 26 (2), 274–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1998.tb01899.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud, K., Carlisle, J.E., and Smith, E., 2008. NIMBYism vs. Environmentalism in attitudes towards energy development. Environmental Politics, 17, 20–39. doi: 10.1080/09644010701811459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C., 2005. Some reflections on an agonistic approach to the public. In: B. Latour and P. Weibel, eds. Making things public: atmospheres of democracy. Karlsruhe: Center for Art and Media/Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 804–807.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, M., Bacow, L., and Sanderson, D., 1983. Facility siting and public opposition. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., 2002. Housing homeless people: local mobilization of federal resources to fight NIMBYism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 97–116. doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.00116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., 2004. Siting, sustainable development and social priorities. Journal of Risk Research, 7, 101–114. doi: 10.1080/1366987042000158686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., Rayner, T., and Bina, O., 2004. New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research. Environment and Planning A, 36 (11), 1943–1959. doi: 10.1068/a36281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piller, C., 1991. The fail-safe society: community defiance and the end of American technological optimism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Plough, A. and Krimsky, S., 1987. The emergence of risk communication studies: social and political context. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12 (3/4), 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, E., et al., 2006. Psychological parameters to understand and manage the NIMBY effect. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56, 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, F.J., 1985. The environmentalist and the LULU. Environment, 27 (1), 7–11, 37–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.D., 2000. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B.G., 1994. Beyond NIMBY: Hazardous waste siting in Canada and the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, K., Sangam, H., and Lake, C., 2003. Evaluation of an HDPE geomembrane after 14 years as a leachate lagoon liner. Canadian Geothechnical Journal, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 40 (3), 536–550. doi: 10.1139/t03-019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scally, C.P. and Tighe, J.R., 2015. Democracy in action? NIMBY as impediment to equitable affordable housing siting. Housing Studies, 30 (5), 749–769. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2015.1013093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schively, C., 2007. Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: reassessing our knowledge base and informing future research. Journal of Planning Literature, 21, 255–266. doi: 10.1177/0885412206295845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sébastien, L., 2011. Quand les acteurs faibles et absents s’immiscent dans la négociation environnementale. Territoire en mouvement, 11, 66–81. doi: 10.4000/tem.1262
   Google Scholar
• Sébastien, L., 2013. Le nimby est mort. Vive la résistance éclairée: le cas de l'opposition à un projet de décharge, Essonne, France. Sociologies pratiques, 2013/2, 27, 145–165. doi: 10.3917/sopr.027.0143
   Google Scholar
• Short, L., 2002. Wind power and English landscape identity. In: M.J. Pasqualetti, P. Gipe, and R.W. Righter, eds. Wind power in view: Energy landscapes in a crowded world. San Diego: Academic press, 43–58.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B. and Klandermans, B., 2001. Politicized collective identity, a social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56 (4), 319–331. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, C., Elci, A., Gunduz, O., and Taskin, N., 2014. An improved landfill site screening procedure under NIMBY syndrome constraints. Landscape and Urban Planning, 132, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. and Marquez, M., 2000. The other side of the NIMBY syndrome. Society & Natural Resources, 13, 273–280. doi: 10.1080/089419200279108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P.D. and McDonough, M.H., 2001. Beyond public participation: fairness in natural resource decision making. Society & Natural Resources, 14 (3), 239–249. doi: 10.1080/089419201750111056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., 2015. Facilitating generation of local knowledge using a collaborative initiator: a NIMBY case in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 46, 130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L.M. and Dear, M.J., 1997. The changing dynamics of community opposition to human service facilities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63 (1), 79–93. doi: 10.1080/01944369708975725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trom, D., 1999. De la réfutation de l’effet NIMBY considérer comme un pratique militante. Notes pour une approche pragmatique de l’activité revendicative. Revue française de science politique, 49 (1), 31–50. doi: 10.3406/rfsp.1999.395353
   Google Scholar
• Vilomet, J.D., 2000. Traçage des pollutions lixiviats de CET sur les eaux souterraines. Thesis (PhD). Aix-Marseille III University.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., et al., 2011. Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: a framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects. In: P. Devine-Wright, ed. Renewable energy and the public: from NIMBY to participation. London: Earthscan, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C.R., Lumsden, C., O’Dowd, S., and Birnie, R.V., 2005. “Green on green”; public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48 (6), 853–875. doi: 10.1080/09640560500294376
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, M., 1996. A sociological framing of the NIMBY (Not-in-my-backyard) syndrome. International Review of Modern Sociology, 26 (1), 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M., 2006. Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31 (1), 85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00191.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M., 2012. Undesired reinforcement of harmful “self-evident truths” concerning the implementation of wind power. Energy Policy, 48, 83–87. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. and Devilee, J., 2009. The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners’ perspective to fairness and community commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52 (2), 217–236. doi: 10.1080/09640560802666552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wustenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., and Burer, M.J., 2007. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35 (5), 2683–2691. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar