Environmental justice as a (potentially) hegemonic concept: a historical look at competing interests between the MST and indigenous people in Brazil

References

• Abram, D. 1996. The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Agence France-Presse. 2017. Garimpeiros fazem massacre em tribo isolada do Amazonas, diz MP [WWW Document]. VEJA.com. Accessed September 11, 2017. http://veja.abril.com.br/brasil/garimpeiros-fazem-massacre-em-tribo-isolada-do-amazonas-diz-mp/.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesecker, A., and S. Hoffmeister. 2010. “Focus: (Re)Productivity, Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders.” Ecological Economics 69: 1703–1711. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsatto, R. S., and M.S. do Carmo. 2013. “A construção do discurso agroecológico no Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem-Terra (MST).” Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 51: 645–660. doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032013000400002.
   Google Scholar
• Branford, S., and O. Glock. 1986. The Last Frontier: Fighting over Land in the Amazon. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Branford, S., and J. Rocha. 2002. Cutting the Wire: The Story of the Landless Movement in Brazil. London: Latin America Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., E. Laclau, and S. Žižek. 2000. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L. W., and S. R. Foster. 2001. From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. 1st ed. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• CONCRAB, C. das C. da R.A. do B. 1995. Caderno de Cooperação Agrícola (No. 5), Sistema Cooperativista dos Assentados. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. W. 1993. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” In Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, edited by S. Gill, 49–67. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, S., and O. Marchart. 2012. Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. 2002. Freedom Evolves. 1st ed. New York: Viking Adult.
   Google Scholar
• De Souza Martins, J. 2002. “Representing the Peasantry? Struggles for/about Land in Brazil.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 29: 300–335. doi.org/10.1080/03066150412331311099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Souza Martins, J. 1990. “Rural Social Movements.” In The Future of Amazonia: Destruction or Sustainable Development?, edited by D. Goodman and A. Hall. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, S. 1999. Las Derechas: The Extreme Right in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile, 1890-1939. 1st ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeVore, J. 2016. “The Landless Invading the Landless: Participation, Coercion, and Agrarian Social Movements in the Cacao Lands of Southern Bahia, Brazil.” In Brazilian Agrarian Social Movements, edited by R. Tarlau and A. Pahnke, 133–155. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diomo, A. M. 1995. A Vez e Voz do Popular: Movimentos Sociais e Participação Política no Brasil Pós-70. ANPOCS/Relume Dumará, Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Dowie, M. 2011. Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict Between Global Conservation and Native Peoples. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairhead, J., M. Leach, and I. Scoones. 2012. “Green Grabbing: a new Appropriation of Nature?” The Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 237–261. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B. M. 2000. A formação do MST no Brasil. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, B. M. 2008. “O MST e as reformas agrárias do Brasil.” Revista Osal A 9: 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Filho, A. O. S., J. M. Ramos, K. Oliveira, and T. N. Nascimento. 2015. “A Evolução do Código Florestal Brasileiro.” Cadernos de Graduação Ciências Humanas e Sociais – UNIT 2: 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, A. 2014. Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2003. “Social Justice in the age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by N. Fraser and A. Honneth, 7–109. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gamba, C., and W. Costa Ribeiro. 2017. “Conservação ambiental no Brasil: uma revisão crítica de sua institucionalização.” Revista de Estudios Brasileños 4: 146–160. doi.org/10.3232/REB.2017.V4.N6.2556.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. 2017. “Lessons from Standing Rock – Of Water, Racism, and Solidarity.” The New England Journal of Medicine 376: 1403–1405. doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1701248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1970. Selections From the Prison Notebooks by Antonio Gramsci Unknown Edition. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. 1999. The Prison Notebooks. London: Electric Book.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2006. Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. 1st ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. B. 1989. Murder at the Margins of the World. New Left Rev. Accessed https://doi.org/10.1080/10714839.1989.11724681
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. 2015. “Smallholders, Forest Management and Rural Development in the Amazon.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42: 233–236. doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.978139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. B., and A. Cockburn. 2010. The Fate of the Forest: Developers, Destroyers, and Defenders of the Amazon, Updated Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendlin, Y. H. 2014a. “The Threshold Problem in Intergenerational Justice.” Ethics and the Environment 19: 1–38. doi: 10.2979/ethicsenviro.19.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Hendlin, Y. H. 2014b. “From Terra Nullius to Terra Communis: Reconsidering Wild Land in an Era of Conservation and Indigenous Rights.” Environmental Philosophy 11: 141–174. doi: 10.5840/envirophil20143205
   Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E., and T. Ranger, eds. 2012. The Invention of Tradition. Reissue ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houtzager, P. P. 2005. “The Movement of the Landless (MST), Juridical Field, and Legal Change in Brazil.” In Law and Globalization From Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality, edited by B. de S. Santos and C. A. Rodríguez-Garavito, 218–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, W. 2006. “Private Agricultural Colonization on a Brazilian Frontier, 1970–1980.” Journal of Historical Geography 32: 839–863. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2004.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, H., and P. Almeida. 2006. Latin American Social Movements: Globalization, Democratization, and Transnational Networks. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kujawa, H. A. 2015. “Conflitos envolvendo indígenas e agricultores no Rio Grande do Sul: dilemas de políticas públicas contraditórias.” Ciências Sociais Unisinos 51. doi.org/10.4013/csu.2015.51.1.08.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, D. S. 2017. “Should Biodiversity and Nature Have to Earn Their Keep? What It Really Means to Bring Environmental Goods into the Marketplace.” Ambio, 1–16. doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0996-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybury-Lewis, B. 1994. The Politics of the Possible: The Brazilian Rural Workers’ Trade Union Movement, 1964-1985. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merlan, F. 2009. “Indigeneity: Global and Local.” Current Anthropology 50: 303–333. doi.org/10.1086/597667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishori, D. 2014. “Reclaiming Commons Rights: Resources, Public Ownership and the Rights of Future Generations.” The Law & Ethics of Human Rights 8. doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2014-0009.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, R. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. 2015. “The Church of Economism and Its Discontents.” Great Transition Initiative. Accessed http://www.greattransition.org/publication/the-church-of-economism-and-its-discontents.
   Google Scholar
• Okin, S. M. 1998. “Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions.” Ethics 108: 661–684. doi:10.1086/233846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. 2013. “Land Regularization in Brazil and the Global Land Grab: Land Regularization in Brazil.” Development and Change 44: 261–283. doi.org/10.1111/dech.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. C. 2002. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfecto, I., J. H. Vandermeer, and A. L. Wright. 2009. Nature’s Matrix: Linking Agriculture, Conservation and Food Sovereignty. 1st ed. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Perruci, G. 1999. “‘Green McWorld’ Versus ‘Gold Jihad’: The Clash of Ideas in the Brazilian Amazon.” Global Society 13: 163–180. doi.org/10.1080/13600829908443185.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason, Environmental Philosophies Series. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poletto, I., and A. Canuto. 2002. Nas pegadas do povo da terra: 25 anos da Comissão Pastoral da Terra. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
   Google Scholar
• Robles, W., and H. Veltmeyer. 2015. The Politics of Agrarian Reform in Brazil: The Landless Rural Workers Movement. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. 1999. Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, I. W. 2016. “The Political Economy of Tribalism in North America: Neotribal Capitalism?” Anthropological Theory. doi.org/10.1177/146349960334003.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soares-Filho, B., R. Rajão, M. Macedo, A. Carneiro, W. Costa, M. Coe, H. Rodrigues, and A. Alencar. 2014. “Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code.” Science 344: 363–364. doi.org/10.1126/science.1246663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stédile, J. P., and B. M. Fernandes. 1999. Brava gente: a trajetória do MST e a luta pela terra no Brasil. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
   Google Scholar
• Stephanson, A., C. Briones, J.P. de Oliveira, R. Nichols, J. E. Chamberlain, and R. White. 2009. Manifest Destinies and Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge, MA: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Stocks, A. 2005. “TOO MUCH FOR TOO FEW: Problems of Indigenous Land Rights in Latin America.” Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 85–104. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez, S. M. 2006. “Gender and Land.” In Promised Land: Competing Visions of Agrarian Reform, edited by P. Rosset, R. Patel, and M. Courville, 192–207. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, A. 1994. Ecopopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. 1st ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., M. McKenzie, and K. McCoy. 2014. “Land Education: Indigenous, Post-Colonial, and Decolonizing Perspectives on Place and Environmental Education Research.” Environmental Education Research 20: 1–23. doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.877708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. “Decolonization is not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1: 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, D. 2014. Are Mexico’s Zapatista rebels still relevant? [WWW Document]. Al-Jazeera. Accessed December 18, 2016. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/01/are-mexico-zapatista-rebels-still-relevant-20141183731812643.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara-Camus, L. 2014. Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vetlesen, A. J. 2015. The Denial of Nature: Environmental Philosophy in the era of Global Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. L., and W. Wolford. 2003. To Inherit the Earth: The Landless Movement and the Struggle for a New Brazil. Oakland: Food First Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zhouri, A. 2010. ““Adverse Forces” in the Brazilian Amazon: Developmentalism Versus Environmentalism and Indigenous Rights.” The Journal of Environment & Development 19: 252–273. doi.org/10.1177/1070496510378097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar