Using NIMBY rhetoric as a political resource to negotiate responses to local energy infrastructure: a power line case study

References

• Anderson, C. 2013. “The Networked Minority: How a Small Group Prevailed in a Local Windfarm Conflict.” Energy Policy 58: 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., M. Billig, D. Edwards, and J. Potter. 2003. “Discourse Analysis Means Doing Analysis: A Critique of six Analytic Shortcomings.” Discourse Analysis Online 1, https://extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a1/antaki2002002-t.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., and H. Darkal. 2018. “(Not) Talking About Justice: Justice Self-Recognition and the Integration of Energy and Environmental-Social Justice Into Renewable Energy Siting.” Local Environment 23 (3): 335–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J., K. Burningham, G. Walker, and N. Cass. 2012. “Imagined Publics and Engagement Around Renewable Energy Technologies in the UK.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (1): 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., and G. Ellis. 2011. “Beyond Consensus? Agonism, Republicanism and a Low Carbon Future.” In Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, edited by P. Devine-Wright, 29–42. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Batel, S. 2018. “A Critical Discussion of Research on the Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Generation and Associated Infrastructures and an Agenda for the Future.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 20 (3): 356–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., and P. Castro. 2015. “Collective Action and Social Change: Examining the Role of Representation in the Communication Between Protesters and Third-Party Members.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 25 (3): 249–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., and P. Devine-Wright. 2015. “Towards a Better Understanding of People’s Responses to Renewable Energy Technologies: Insights From Social Representations Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (3): 311–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., P. Devine-Wright, and T. Tangeland. 2013. “Social Acceptance of low Carbon Energy and Associated Infrastructures: A Critical Discussion.” Energy Policy 58: 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batel, S., P. Devine-Wright, L. Wold, H. Egeland, G. Jacobsen, and O. Aas. 2015. “The Role of (de-) Essentialisation Within Siting Conflicts: An Interdisciplinary Approach.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., T. Gray, and C. Haggett. 2005. “The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses.” Environmental Politics 14 (4): 460–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., T. Gray, C. Haggett, and J. Swaffield. 2013. “Re-visiting the ‘Social Gap’: Public Opinion and Relations of Power in the Local Politics of Wind Energy.” Environmental Politics 22 (1): 115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and Opinion: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Burningham, K. 2000. “Using the Language of NIMBY: a Topic for Research, not an Activity for Researchers.” Local Environment 5 (1): 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burningham, K., J. Barnett, and G. Walker. 2015. “An Array of Deficits: Unpacking NIMBY Discourses in Wind Energy Developers’ Conceptualizations of Their Local Opponents.” Society & Natural Resources 28 (3): 246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, P., and C. Mouro. 2016. “‘Imagining Ourselves’ as Participating Publics: An Example From Biodiversity Conservation.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (7): 858–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and N. Longhurst. 2016. “Participation in Transition (s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18: 585–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. J., J. Reichl, and M. Schmidthaler. 2014. “Re-focussing Research Efforts on the Public Acceptance of Energy Infrastructure: A Critical Review.” Energy 76: 4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., and P. Devine-Wright. 2010. “Making Electricity Networks” Visible": Industry Actor Representations of” Publics” and Public Engagement in Infrastructure Planning.” Public Understanding of Science 43 (4): 942–960.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, M. 1992. “Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.” Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (3): 288–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2005. “Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an Integrated Framework for Understanding Public Perceptions of Wind Energy.” Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology 8: 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2009. “Rethinking NIMBYism: The Role of Place Attachment and Place Identity in Explaining Place-Protective Action.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 19 (6): 426–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2011. “From Backyards to Places: Public Engagement and the Emplacement of Renewable Energy Technologies.” In Public Engagement with Renewable Energy: From NIMBY to Participation, edited by P. Devine-Wright, 57–70. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Di Masso, A., J. Dixon, and E. Pol. 2011. “On the Contested Nature of Place: ‘Figuera’s and the Hole of Shame’ and the Ideological Struggle Over Public Space in Barcelona.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky. 1982. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elcheroth, G., W. Doise, and S. Reicher. 2011. “On the Knowledge of Politics and the Politics of Knowledge: How a Social Representations Approach Helps us Rethink the Subject of Political Psychology.” Political Psychology 32 (5): 729–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, G., J. Barry, and C. Robinson. 2007. “Many Ways to say ‘no’, Different Ways to say ‘Yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to Understand Public Acceptance of Wind Farm Proposals.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4): 517–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entradas, M. 2016. “What is the Public’s Role in ‘Space’policymaking? Images of the Public by Practitioners of ‘Space’communication in the United Kingdom.” Public Understanding of Science 25 (5): 603–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, S., and R. McLeman. 2012. “Attitudes Towards New Renewable Energy Technologies in the Eastern Ontario Highlands.” Journal of Rural and Community Development 7 (3): 106–122.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, W., and S. Pastor. 1992. “NIMBYS and LULUs, Stalking the Syndromes.” Journal of Social Issues 48 (4): 39–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg, W., and C. Steinsapir. 1991. “Not in our Backyards: The Grassroots Environmental Movement.” Society & Natural Resources 4: 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futák-Campbell, B., and C. Haggett. 2011. “Tilting at Windmills? Using Discourse Analysis to Understand the Attitude-Behaviour gap in Renewable Energy Conflicts.” Mekhanizm Rehuluvannya Economiky 1 (51): 207–220.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. 2008. “The Importance of Being Ordinary.” In Richard Hoggart and Cultural Studies, edited by S. Owens, 171–186. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., M. Jalas, J. Rinkinen, and P. Tainio. 2015. “The Local Community as a “low-Carbon lab”: Promises and Perils.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14: 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, C. 2004. “Re-Presentation and Resistance in the Context of School Exclusion: Reasons to be Critical.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 14 (5): 356–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash. Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP16-026. Harvard Kennedy School.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2014. “A Mirror for Science.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. R., and J. R. Eiser. 2009. “Identifying Predictors of Attitudes Towards Local Onshore Wind Development with Reference to an English Case Study.” Energy Policy 37 (11): 4604–4614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovchelovitch, S. 2007. Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, M., and J. Jang. 2013. “NIMBY or NIABY? Who Defines a Policy Problem and why: Analysis of Framing in Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility Placement in South Korea.” Asia Pacific Viewpoint 54 (1): 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessi, S., and C. Howarth. 2015. “Social Change and Continuity: Connecting Reflexivity and Community Development.” In Reflexivity and Psychology: A Volume in YIS: The Yearbook of Idiographic Science, edited by G. Marsico, R. Ruggieri, and S. Salvatore, 343–363. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, Jørgen K., Line Camilla Wold, Øystein Aas, Jens Jacob Kielland Haug, Susana Batel, Patrick Devine-Wright, Marte Qvenild, and Gerd B. Jacobsen. 2015. “Local Perceptions of Opportunities for Engagement and Procedural Justice in Electricity Transmission Grid Projects in Norway and the UK.” Land Use Policy 48: 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, R. 1996. “Volunteers, NIMBYs, and Environmental Justice: Dilemmas of Democratic Practice.” Antipode 28: 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., and M. Scott. 2015. “Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re) Conceiving Wind Power's ‘Planning Problem’.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17 (5): 593–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertzman, R. 2015. Environmental Melancholia: Psychoanalytic Dimensions of Engagement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. 2017. “Post-truth Politics and the Social Sciences.” Environmental Sociology 3 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mannarini, T., and M. Roccato. 2011. “Uses of the Term NIMBY in the Italian Press, 1992–2008.” Environmental Politics 20 (6): 807–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannarini, T., M. Roccato, A. Fedi, and A. Rovere. 2009. “Six Factors Fostering Protest: Predicting Participation in Locally Unwanted Land Uses Movements.” Political Psychology 30 (6): 895–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcclymont, K., and P. O'hare. 2008. ““We're not NIMBYs!” Contrasting Local Protest Groups with Idealised Conceptions of Sustainable Communities.” Local Environment 13 (4): 321–335.
   Google Scholar
• McGurty, E. 1997. “From NIMBY to Civil Rights: The Origins of the Environmental Justice Movement.” Environmental History 2: 301–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melosi, M. 2000. “Environmental Justice, Political Agenda Setting and the Myths of History.” Journal of Policy History 12: 43–71.
   Google Scholar
• Nadaï, A., and O. Labussiere. 2017. “Exhaustible-renewable Wind Power.” In The Routledge Companion to Energy Geographies, edited by S. Bouzarovsky, M. Pasqualetti, and V. C. Broto, 306–329. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1986. “Extreme Case Formulations: A way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2): 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley, M. 1998. “‘Just an Ordinary Australian’: Self-Categorization and the Discursive Construction of Facticity in ‘new Racist’political Rhetoric.” British Journal of Social Psychology 37 (3): 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renewables Directive. 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1990. Governing the Soul: the Shaping of the Private Self. London, UK: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastien, L. 2017. “From NIMBY to Enlightened Resistance: a Framework Proposal to Decrypt Land-use Disputes Based on a Landfill Opposition Case in France.” Local Environment 22 (4): 461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford, J., and M. Slattery. 2010. “Public Attitudes of Wind Energy in Texas: Local Communities in Close Proximity to Wind Farms and Their Effect on Decision-Making.” Energy Policy 38 (5): 2508–2519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. 2013. “Parochialism–a Defence.” Progress in Human Geography 37 (5): 658–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, M. 2013. “Defending and Transcending Local Identity Through Environmental Discourse.” Environmental Politics 22 (5): 811–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Horst, D. 2007. “NIMBY or not? Exploring the Relevance of Location and the Politics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2705–2714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. 2003. “Discourses About Ethnic Group (de-) Essentialism: Oppressive and Progressive Aspects.” British Journal of Social Psychology 42 (3): 371–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 1995. “Renewable Energy and the Public.” Land Use Policy 12 (1): 49–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. 2009. “Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice.” Antipode 41 (4): 614–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and N. Cass. 2007. “Carbon Reduction,‘the Public’and Renewable Energy: Engaging with Socio-Technical Configurations.” Area 39 (4): 458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 1994. “Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions Behind the NIMBY-Theory on Facility Siting.” Urban Studies 31 (6): 851–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2000. “Wind Power and the NYMBY-Myth: Institutional Capacity and the Limited Significance of Public Support.” Renewable Energy 21: 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. 2017. Contesting Rurality: Politics in the British Countryside. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., M. Wolsink, and M. J. Bürer. 2007. “Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept.” Energy Policy 35 (5): 2683–2691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar