Prime-time access for whom? Rhythms fairness and the dynamic pricing of infrastructure services

References

• Alexander, Barbara R. 2010. “Dynamic Pricing? Not So Fast! A Residential Consumer Perspective.” The Electricity Journal 23 (6): 39–49. doi:10.1016/j.tej.2010.05.014.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrosio-Albala, Pepa, Lucie Middlemiss, Anne Owen, Tom Hargreaves, Nick Emmel, Jan Gilbertson, Angela Tod, et al. 2020. “From Rational to Relational: How Energy Poor Households Engage with the British Retail Energy Market.” Energy Research & Social Science 70 (December): 101765. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101765.
   Google Scholar
• Attard, Maria, and Stephen G. Ison. 2010. “The Implementation of Road User Charging and the Lessons Learnt: The Case of Valletta, Malta.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (1): 14–22. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviv, Yossi, and Gustavo Vulcano. 2012. “Dynamic List Pricing.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, edited by Özalp Özer, and Robert Phillips. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199543175.013.0023.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhi, Fleura, and Giana M. Eckhardt. 2012. “Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing: Table 1.” Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4): 881–898. doi:10.1086/666376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, Stanley, Elizabeth Shove, and Peter Forman. 2020. “Conceptualising Flexibility: Challenging Representations of Time and Society in the Energy Sector*.” Time & Society 29 (4): 923–944. doi:10.1177/0961463X20905479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocken, Nancy M. P., Ingrid de Pauw, Conny Bakker, and Bram van der Grinten. 2016. “Product Design and Business Model Strategies for a Circular Economy.” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 33 (5): 308–320. doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, S. 2013. “Effective and Equitable Adoption of Opt-In Residential Dynamic Electricity Pricing.” Review of Industrial Organization 42 (2): 127–160. doi:10.1007/s11151-012-9367-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, Severin, and Stephen Holland. 2005. “On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets with Time-Invariant Retail Prices.” The Rand Journal of Economics 36 (3): 469–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, Maria, Jonas Eliasson, and Carl Hamilton. 2016. “Why Experience Changes Attitudes to Congestion Pricing: The Case of Gothenburg.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 85: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, Maria, and Ida Kristoffersson. 2015. “The Gothenburg Congestion Charge. Effects, Design and Politics.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 75: 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzarovski, Stefan, and Neil Simcock. 2017. “Spatializing Energy Justice.” Energy Policy 107: 640–648. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breukers, S. C., and R. M. Mourik. 2013. “The End-Users as Starting Point for Designing Dynamic Pricing Approaches to Change Household Energy.” DuneWorks B.V. https://leonardo-energy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/The-End-users-as-Starting-Point-for-Designing-Dynamic-Pricing-Approaches-to-Change-Household-Energy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Calver, Philippa, and Neil Simcock. 2021. “Demand Response and Energy Justice: A Critical Overview of Ethical Risks and Opportunities Within Digital, Decentralised, and Decarbonised Futures.” Energy Policy 151 (April): 112198. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112198.
   Google Scholar
• Cappers, Peter, C. Anna Spurlock, Annika Todd, and Ling Jin. 2018. “Are Vulnerable Customers Any Different Than Their Peers When Exposed to Critical Peak Pricing: Evidence from the U.S.” Energy Policy 123: 421–432. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Ningyuan, and Guillermo Gallego. 2019. “Welfare Analysis of Dynamic Pricing.” Management Science 65 (1): 139–151. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2017.2943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronopoulos, Themis. 2012. “Congestion Pricing: The Political Viability of a Neoliberal Spatial Mobility Proposal in London, Stockholm, and New York City.” Urban Research & Practice 5 (2): 187–208. doi:10.1080/17535069.2012.691617.
   Google Scholar
• City of Stockholm. 2006. ‘Facts and Results from the Stockholm Trials, First Version – June 2006’. Congestion charge secretariat, City of Stockholm. http://webbplatsarkivet.stockholm.se/_sites/www.stockholmsforsoket.se/2016/01_25/upload/The%20Stockholm%20Trial%2C%20facts%20and%20results_Expert%20Group%20Summary%20June%202006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Correia-da-Silva, João, Isabel Soares, and Raquel Fernández. 2020. “Impact of Dynamic Pricing on Investment in Renewables.” Energy 202: 117695. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crang, M. 2012. “Temporal Ecologies: Multiple Times, Multiple Spaces, and Complicating Space Times.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44 (9): 2119–2123. doi:10.1068/a45438
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, R. W. 1979. “Peak-load Pricing: European Lessons for U.S. Energy Policy” European Journal of Operational Research 3 (5): 423–424. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(79)90132-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao, Mi. 2019. “Towards Sustainable Urban Transport in Singapore: Policy Instruments and Mobility Trends.” Transport Policy 81: 320–330. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, Goutam, and Krishnendranath Mitra. 2017. “A Literature Review on Dynamic Pricing of Electricity.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 68 (10): 1131–1145. doi:10.1057/s41274-016-0149-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echegaray, Fabián, and Francesca Hansstein. 2020. “Share a Ride, Rent a Tool, Swap Used Goods, Change the World? Motivations to Engage in Collaborative Consumption in Brazil.” Local Environment 25 (11–12): 891–906. doi:10.1080/13549839.2020.1845132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, Jonas. 2016. “Is Congestion Pricing Fair? Consumer and Citizen Perspectives on Equity Effects.” Transport Policy 52: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, Jonas, and Lars-Göran Mattsson. 2006. “Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40 (7): 602–620. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epting, Shane. 2016. “The Moral Dimensions of Infrastructure.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2): 435–449. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9663-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2019. Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on Common Rules for the Internal Market for Electricity and Amending Directive 2012/27/EU (Text with EEA Relevance.). Vol. 158. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/944/oj/eng.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, Ahmad, and Neil Lessem. 2012. ‘Managing the Benefits and Costs of Dynamic Pricing in Australia’. Prepared for The Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC). The Brattle Group.
   Google Scholar
• Faruqui, Ahmad, and Jenny Palmer. 2011. “Dynamic Pricing of Electricity and Its Discontents.” SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.1908963.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, Roldán, Juan Manuel, Manuel Burgos Payán, Jesús Manuel Riquelme Santos, and Ángel Luis Trigo García. 2017. “The Voluntary Price for the Small Consumer: Real-Time Pricing in Spain.” Energy Policy 102 (March): 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.040.
   Google Scholar
• FEST. 2012. ‘Demand Side Response in the Domestic Sector- a Literature Review of Major Trials’. Frontier Economics and Sustainability First & The Department of energy and climate change, UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attac hment_data/file/48552/5756-demand-side-response-in-the-domestic-sector-a-lit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, Judith. 2006. Consuming Passions: Leisure and Pleasure in Victorian Britain. London: HarperPress.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Joel P. 2012. “Role of Context in Equity Effects of Congestion Pricing.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2297 (1): 29–37. doi:10.3141/2297-04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, Martin, Paulo Savaget, Nancy M. P. Bocken, and Erik Jan Hultink. 2017. “The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–768. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Chris, Daniel Guttentag, Ulrike Gretzel, Lan Yao, and Jym Morton. 2018. “Use of Dynamic Pricing Strategies by Airbnb Hosts.” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30 (1): 2–20. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2016-0540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony. 1984. ‘The Constitution of Society’. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeme, Sherriff. 2015. “Voting on Sustainable Transport: Communication and Governance Challenges in Greater Manchester's ‘Congestion Charge’ Referendum.” Local Environment 20 (12): 1507–1530. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.911267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Colin P., John S. Heywood, and Maria Navarro Paniagua. 2020. “Did the London Congestion Charge Reduce Pollution?” Regional Science and Urban Economics 84: 103573. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyamfi, Samuel, Susan Krumdieck, and Tania Urmee. 2013. “Residential Peak Electricity Demand Response—Highlights of Some Behavioural Issues.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25: 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hårsman, Björn, and John M. Quigley. 2010. “Political and Public Acceptability of Congestion Pricing: Ideology and Self-Interest.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (4): 854–874. doi:10.1002/pam.20529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, William J., and John L. Neufeld. 1984. “Time-of-Day Pricing in the U.S. Electric Power Industry at the Turn of the Century.” The RAND Journal of Economics 15 (1): 116–126. doi:10.2307/3003674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haws, Kelly L., and William O. Bearden. 2006. “Dynamic Pricing and Consumer Fairness Perceptions.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (3): 304–311. doi:10.1086/508435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HETUS. (Harmonised European Time Use Survey, accessed Jan. 20, 2021). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/microdata/time-use-survey.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, Kersty, and Nicholas Lynch. 2016. “Diversifying and De-Growing the Circular Economy: Radical Social Transformation in a Resource-Scarce World.” Futures 82: 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Shira, and Lester Lave. 2014. “Equity in Residential Electricity Pricing.” The Energy Journal 35 (2), doi:10.5547/01956574.35.2.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2019. ‘Time-of-Use Tariffs – Innovation Landscape Brief’. International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Feb/IRENA_Innovation_ToU_tariffs_2019.pdf?la=en&hash=36658ADA8AA98677888DB2C184D1EE6A048C7470.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Kirsten, Darren McCauley, Raphael Heffron, Hannes Stephan, and Robert Rehner. 2016. “Energy Justice: A Conceptual Review.” Energy Research & Social Science 11 (January): 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Charlotte. 2020. “Is Demand Side Response a Woman's Work? Domestic Labour and Electricity Shifting in low Income Homes in the United Kingdom.” Energy Research & Social Science 68: 101558. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joskow, Paul L., and Catherine D. Wolfram. 2012. “Dynamic Pricing of Electricity.” American Economic Review 102 (3): 381–385. doi:10.1257/aer.102.3.381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärrholm, Mattias. 2009. “To the Rhythm of Shopping—on Synchronisation in Urban Landscapes of Consumption.” Social & Cultural Geography 10 (4): 421–440. doi:10.1080/14649360902853254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krafnät, Svenska. 2022. The Control Room. Available at https://www.svk.se/en/national-grid/the-control-room/. Accessed 30.1.2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kristoffersson, Ida, and Leonid Engelson. 2010. “Modifications of the Stockholm Congestion Pricing Scheme and Effects on Different User Groups.” Louvain-la-Neuve: European Regional Science Association (ERSA). https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/119195.
   Google Scholar
• Leape, Jonathan. 2006. “The London Congestion Charge.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (4): 157–176. doi:10.1257/jep.20.4.157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legeby, Ann. 2013. “Patterns of co-Presence: Spatial Configuration and Social Segregation.” (Doctoral thesis, monograph). KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Qiyang, Karen Lucas, Greg Marsden, and Yang Liu. 2019. “Egalitarianism and Public Perception of Social Inequities: A Case Study of Beijing Congestion Charge.” Transport Policy 74: 47–62. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, Karen. 2012. “Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now?” Transport Policy 20: 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, Karel. 2016. Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315746852.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Chris J. 2016. “The Sharing Economy: A Pathway to Sustainability or a Nightmarish Form of Neoliberal Capitalism?” Ecological Economics 121 (January): 149–159. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, Darren, Raphael J. Heffron, Hannes Stephan, and Kristen Jenkins. 2013. “Advancing Energy Justice: The Triumvirate of Tenets.” Energy Law Reviews 32: 107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenovic, Milos N., and Tristram McPherson. 2016. “Engineering Social Justice Into Traffic Control for Self-Driving Vehicles?” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4): 1131–1149. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9690-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulíček, Ondřej, Robert Osman, and Daniel Seidenglanz. 2016. “Time–Space Rhythms of the City—The Industrial and Postindustrial Brno.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48 (1): 115–131. doi:10.1177/0308518X15594809.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, Vinicius M., Maíra Pinheiro Soares, and Roberto Paschoalino. 2015. “Segregated Networks in the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (6): 1084–1102. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuteleers, Stijn, Machiel Mulder, and Frank Hindriks. 2017. “Assessing Fairness of Dynamic Grid Tariffs.” Energy Policy 108 (September): 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.028.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, Anna, Peter Adey, Tim Cresswell, Jane Yeonjae Lee, Andre Nóvoa, and Cristina Temenos. 2019. “Commoning Mobility: Towards a New Politics of Mobility Transitions.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 44 (2): 346–360. doi:10.1111/tran.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen, Trine, and Rasmus Ploug Jenle. 2018. “Organizing Consumers for a Decarbonized Electricity System: Calculative Agencies and User Scripts in a Danish Demonstration Project.” Energy Research & Social Science 38: 102–109. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, André de, and Robin Lindsey. 2011. “Traffic Congestion Pricing Methodologies and Technologies.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19 (6): 1377–1399. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2011.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, Jenny, Karolina Södergren, and Nancy Bocken. 2019. “The Role of Cities in the Sharing Economy: Exploring Modes of Governance in Urban Sharing Practices.” Energies 12 (24): 4737. doi:10.3390/en12244737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powells, Gareth, Harriet Bulkeley, Sandra Bell, and Ellis Judson. 2014. “Peak Electricity Demand and the Flexibility of Everyday Life.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 55: 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powells, Gareth, and Michael J. Fell. 2019. “Flexibility Capital and Flexibility Justice in Smart Energy Systems.” Energy Research & Social Science 54: 56–59. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. 1981. “‘Social Reproduction and the Time-Geography of Everyday Life’. Geografiska Annaler. Series B.” Human Geography 63 (1): 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, Joachim, Corinne Faure, and Xavier Gassmann. 2019. “Household Internal and External Electricity Contract Switching in EU Countries.” Applied Economics 51 (1): 103–116. doi:10.1080/00036846.2018.1494379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharam, Andrea. 2005. Market Segmentation and Domestic Electricity Supply in Victoria. Institute for Social Research Swinburne University of Technology. https://www.academia.edu/29551137/Market_Segmentation_and_Domestic_Electricity_Supply_in_Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi. 2018. ‘Mobility Justice. The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. London, U.K.’: Verso. https://www.versobooks.com/books/2901-mobility-justice.
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, Emilia, Enora Robin, and Jenny McArthur. 2020. “Night-Time Mobilities and (in)Justice in London: Constructing Mobile Subjects and the Politics of Difference in Policy-Making.” Journal of Transport Geography 82: 102569. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Michael H. Dworkin. 2015. “Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications.” Applied Energy 142: 435–444. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahel, Walter R. 2010. The Performance Economy. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230274907.
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Yolande. 2010. “Air-Conditioning Australian Households: The Impact of Dynamic Peak Pricing.” Energy Policy 38 (11): 7312–7322. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Yolande. 2014. “Smart Energy in Everyday Life” Interactions 21 (4): 24–31. doi:10.1145/2621931.
   Google Scholar
• Torriti, Jacopo. 2012. “Price-Based Demand Side Management: Assessing the Impacts of Time-of-Use Tariffs on Residential Electricity Demand and Peak Shifting in Northern Italy.” Energy 44 (1): 576–583. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torriti, Jacopo, and Timur Yunusov. 2020. “It’s Only a Matter of Time: Flexibility, Activities and Time of use Tariffs in the United Kingdom.” Energy Research & Social Science 69: 101697. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotta, Gianluca, Kirsten Gram-Hanssen, and Pernille Lykke Jørgensen. 2020. “Heterogeneity of Electricity Consumption Patterns in Vulnerable Households.” Energies 13 (18): 4713. doi:10.3390/en13184713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tweed, Katherine. 2014. “New Orleans’ Peak-Time Rebate a Strong Draw for Low-Income Customers. This Residential Program Boasts a 96 Percent Approval Rating. What Will Entergy New Orleans Do Next?” Greentech Media. March 26. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/New-Orleans-Peak-Time-Rebate-Really-Appeals-to-Low-Income-Customers
   Google Scholar
• US DoE. 2014. ‘Customer Participation in the Smart Grid - Lessons Learned’. Smart Grid Investment Grant program. U.S. department of Energy. https://smartgrid.gov/project/entergy_new_orleans_inc_advanced_metering_infrastructure_pilot.
   Google Scholar
• Vardakas, John S., Nizar Zorba, and Christos V. Verikoukis. 2015. “A Survey on Demand Response Programs in Smart Grids: Pricing Methods and Optimization Algorithms.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17 (1): 152–178. doi:10.1109/COMST.2014.2341586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinghieri, Ersilia, and Tim Schwanen. 2020. “Transport and Mobility Justice: Evolving Discussions.” Journal of Transport Geography 87: 102798. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickrey, William S. 1963. “Pricing in Urban and Suburban Transport.” The American Economic Review 53 (2): 452–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Gordon. 2014. “The Dynamics of Energy Demand: Change, Rhythm and Synchronicity.” Energy Research & Social Science 1: 49–55. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• West, Jens, and Maria Börjesson. 2020. “The Gothenburg Congestion Charges: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Distribution Effects.” Transportation 47 (1): 145–174. doi:10.1007/s11116-017-9853-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Lee V., and Nicole D. Sintov. 2020. “Health and Financial Impacts of Demand-Side Response Measures Differ Across Sociodemographic Groups.” Nature Energy 5 (1): 50–60. doi:10.1038/s41560-019-0507-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1985. Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zvolska, Lucie, Matthias Lehner, Yuliya Voytenko Palgan, Oksana Mont, and Andrius Plepys. 2019. “Urban Sharing in Smart Cities: The Cases of Berlin and London.” Local Environment 24 (7): 628–645. doi:10.1080/13549839.2018.1463978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar