Neighbourhood social sustainable development and spatial scale: a qualitative case study in Sweden

References

• Andersson, R., and Å Bråmå. 2004. “Selective Migration in Swedish Distressed Neighbourhoods: Can Area-Based Urban Policies Counteract Segregation Processes?” Housing Studies 19 (4): 517–539. doi: 10.1080/0267303042000221945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., A. Bråmå, and E. Holmqvist. 2010. “Counteracting Segregation: Swedish Policies and Experiences.” Housing Studies 25 (2): 237–256. doi: 10.1080/02673030903561859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. “Avoiding the Local Trap – Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 26 (2): 195–207. doi: 10.1177/0739456 ( 06291389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M. 2012. “A Missing Pillar? Challenges in Theorizing and Practicing Social Sustainability: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 8 (1): 3–14. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., and S. Power. 2009. “Urban Form and Social Sustainability: The Role of Density and Housing Type.” Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 36 (1): 30–48. doi: 10.1068/b33129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 1998. “Between Fixity and Motion: Accumulation, Territorial Organization and the Historical Geography of Spatial Scales.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16 (4): 459–481. doi:10.1068/d160459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. 2003. “Situational Analyses: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn.” Symbolic Interaction 26 (4): 553–576. doi: 10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission, European. 2020. “European Social Progress Index.” https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/maps/social_progress2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstedt, M., and V. Lozic. 2017. “Managing Urban Unrest: Problematising Juvenile Delinquency in Multi-Ethnic Sweden.” Critical and Radical Social Work 5 (2): 207–222. doi: 10.1332/204986017 ( 14933953111175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D., and H. Leitner. 1997. “The Political Construction of Scale.” Political Geography 16 (2): 93–97. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N., G. Bramley, S. Power, and C. Brown. 2011. “The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability.” Sustainable Development 19 (5): 289–300. doi: 10.1002/sd.417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., A. Santosa, L. Zetterberg, I. Kawachi, and N. Ng. 2021. “Social Capital and Sustainable Social Development – How Are Changes in Neighbourhood Social Capital Associated with Neighbourhood Sociodemographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics?” Sustainability 13 (23): 13161. doi:10.3390/su132313161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanberger, A., and J. Lindgren. 2021. Utvärdering av “Umeå Växer Tryggt och Säkert”– Slutrapport [Evaluation of the Municipal Program Umeå Växer Tryggt och Säkert]. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen Löfstrand, C. 2015. “Private Security Policing by ‘Ethnic Matching’ in Swedish Suburbs: Avoiding and Managing Accusations of Ethnic Discrimination.” Policing and Society 25 (2): 150–169. doi:10.1080/10439463.2013.817996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 1996. “Post-Fordism and the State.” In Comparative Welfare Systems. The Scandinavian Model in a Period of Change, edited by B. Grev, 165–183. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24791-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lozic, V. 2018. “Att Lära av det Lokala och Experimentera: Resilienstänkande i Brottsförebyggande Arbete. [Learning from the Local and Experimenting: Resilience Thinking in Crime Prevention Work].” Arkiv. Tidskrift för Samhällsanalys 9: 129–157. doi:10.13068/2000-6217.9.5
   Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A. 2000. “The Social Construction of Scale.” Progress in Human Geography 24 (2): 219–242. doi:10.1191/030913200674086272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. 2003. “Framing Space and Time in the City: Urban Policy and the Politics of Spatial and Temporal Scale.” Journal of Urban Affairs 25 (2): 159–178. doi:10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOA. 2017. Utsatta områden – Social ordning, kriminell struktur och utmaningar för polisen [The Swedish Police Authority, The National Operations Department. Vulnerable areas - Social order, criminal structure and challenges for the police]. Nationella operativa avdelningen, underrättelseenheten.
   Google Scholar
• Polit, D. F., and C. T. Beck. 2010. “Generalization in Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Myths and Strategies.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 47 (11): 1451–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, T., and O. B. Jensen. 2003. “Linking Discourse and Space: Towards a Cultural Sociology of Space in Analysing Spatial Policy Discourses.” Urban Studies 40 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1080/00420980220080131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosa, A., N. Ng, L. Zetterberg, and M. Eriksson. 2020. “Study Protocol: Social Capital as a Resource for the Planning and Design of Socially Sustainable and Health Promoting Neighborhoods – A Mixed Method Study.” Frontiers in Public Health 8, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.581078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. R., and R. Keivani. 2017. “Critical Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Social Sustainability in the Built Environment - a Meta-Analysis.” Local Environment 22 (12): 1526–1545. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1379476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. R., and R. Keivani. 2019. “The Triad of Social Sustainability: Defining and Measuring Social Sustainability of Urban Neighbourhoods.” Urban Research & Practice 12 (4): 448–471. doi:10.1080/17535069.2018.1469039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. 2020. Umeås stadsdelar – så står det till! Sociala stadsrumsanalyser och stadsdelsbeskrivningar som underlag till gestaltning av livsmiljöer för välbefinnande, tillit och trygghet [Umeå's Districts – That's How It Is! Social Urban Space Analyzes and District Descriptions as a Basis for the Design of Living Environments for Well-Being, Trust and Security].
   Google Scholar
• WCED. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.
   Google Scholar
• Weingaertner, C., and Å Moberg. 2014. “Exploring Social Sustainability: Learning from Perspectives on Urban Development and Companies and Products.” Sustainable Development 22 (2): 122–133. doi:10.1002/sd.536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westlund, H., R. Rutten, and F. Boekema. 2010. “Social Capital, Distance, Borders and Levels of Space: Conclusions and Further Issues.” European Planning Studies 18 (6): 965–970. doi:10.1080/09654311003701506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilbanks, T. J. 2007. “Scale and Sustainability.” Climate Policy (Earthscan) 7 (4): 278–287. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcraft, S. 2012. “Social Sustainability and new Communities: Moving from Concept to Practice in the UK.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 68: 29–42. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.204
   Google Scholar