Opportunity access as a design framework for guiding transportation and land use integration: an evaluation of U.S. transit-oriented developments (TOD)

References

• Appleyard, B. 2005. “The Smart Growth Catalysts.” Planning 71 (11). https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=771708.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B. S. 2011. New Methods to Measure Urban Environments for Consumer Behavior Research| Individual Access Corridor Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Travel to Rapid Transit. University of California, Berkeley. http://gradworks.umi.com/34/44/3444652.html.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., C. Ferrell, C. Allen, and M. Taecker. 2016. “Toward a Typology of Transit Corridor Livability.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. doi:10.3141/2543-08.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., C. Ferrell, M. Carroll, and M. Taecker. 2014. “Toward Livability Ethics: A Framework to Guide Planning, Design, and Engineering Decisions.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2403: 62–71. doi:10.3141/2403-08.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., C. Ferrell, and M. Taecker. 2017. “Transit Corridor Livability: Realizing the Potential of Transportation and Land Use Integration.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the National Academies of Sciences 2671 (1): 20–30. doi:10.3141/2671-03.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, M., D. Belzer, A. Benedict, P. Esling, P. Haas, G. Miknaitis, E. Wampler, J. Wood, L. Young, and S. Zimbabwe. 2010. Performance-Based Transit-Oriented Development Typology Guidebook. Center for Transit Oriented Development. http://www.cnt.org/sites/default/files/publications/CNT_TODTypologyGuidebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• CDC – Healthy Places – Health Impact Assessment (HIA). n.d. Accessed June 7, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 2000. Transport and Land Use: Key Issues in Metropolitan Planning and Smart Growth. University of California Transportation Center. http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc/item/8dc5p6mv.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 2001. “Integration of Urban Transport and Urban Planning.” In The Challenge of Urban Government: Policies and Practices. World Bank. http://www.nsl.ethz.ch/displus/147/pdf/cervero.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 2003. “Growing Smart by Linking Transportation and Land Use: Perspectives from California.” Built Environment (1978–) 29 (1): 66–78. doi:10.2148/benv.29.1.66.53948.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., C. Ferrell, and S. Murphy. 2002. “Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review.” TCRP Research Results Digest 52. https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=726711.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and E. Guerra. 2011. Urban Densities and Transit: A Multi-Dimensional Perspective (Working Paper UCB-ITS-VWP-2011-6). Institute of Transportation Studies University of California, Berkeley. Accessed July 25, 2016. http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/201109DensityUCBITSVWP.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 (3): 199–219. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., T. Rood, and B. Appleyard. 1999. “Tracking Accessibility: Employment and Housing Opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area.” Environment and Planning A 31 (7): 1259–1278. doi:10.1068/a311259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H., and G. Ohland. 2004. The New Transit Town: Best Practices in Transit-Oriented Development. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• El-Geneidy, A. M., and D. M. Levinson. 2006. Access to Destinations: Development of Accessibility Measures. http://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/638.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2001. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis.” Transportation Research Record 1780: 87–113. doi:10.3141/1780-10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, C. E., B. Appleyard, and M. Taecker. 2016. A Handbook for Building Livable Transit Corridors: Methods, Metrics and Strategies (TCRP H-45). Transit Cooperative Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. 2005. “Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us?” International Regional Science Review 28 (2): 146–167. doi:10.1177/0160017604273626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., and D. M. Kammen. 2014. “Spatial Distribution of U.S. Household Carbon Footprints Reveals Suburbanization Undermines Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Urban Population Density.” Environmental Science & Technology 48 (2): 895–902. doi:10.1021/es4034364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J., J. Grengs, and Q. Shen. 2009. “Metropolitan Accessibility and Transportation Sustainability: Comparative Indicators for Policy Reform.” Urban Research Symposium, 5 June 2009, Marseille, France. https://trid-trb-org.libproxy.sdsu.edu/view/2009/C/1152335.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J., J. Grengs, Q. Shen, and Q. Shen. 2012. “Does Accessibility Require Density or Speed?” Journal of the American Planning Association 78 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1080/01944363.2012.677119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. M. 1998. “Accessibility and the Journey to Work.” Journal of Transport Geography 6 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00036-7.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. 2022. Evaluating Criticism of Smart Growth.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T., P. Thorsnes, and B. Appleyard. 2007. The Transportation/Land Use Connection (New). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association (Planners Press).
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J. L. 2008. “Smart Growth and Transit-Oriented Development at the State Level: Lessons from California, New Jersey, and Western Australia.” Journal of Public Transportation 11 (3): 77–108. doi:10.5038/2375-0901.11.3.5.
   Google Scholar
• Renne, J. L. 2009. “From Transit-Adjacent to Transit-Oriented Development.” Local Environment 14 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/13549830802522376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renne, J., and R. Ewing. 2013. Transit-Oriented Development: An Examination of America’s Transit Precincts in 2000 & 2010. UNOTI Publications. http://scholarworks.uno.edu/unoti_pubs/17.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. Census Bureau, D. I. S. n.d. Commuting (Journey to Work) Main. ACS JTW Data by Block Group, 2006–2010. Accessed August 1, 2016. http://www.census.gov/hhes/commuting/.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. n.d. Location Affordability Index. Accessed June 7, 2016. http://www.locationaffordability.info.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, F., and R. Caves, eds. 2012. Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of People and Communities. Oxfordshire, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zillow Data. 2016. Zillow Research. http://www.zillow.com/research/data/.
   Google Scholar