Gendering platform co-operativism: the rise of women-owned rider co-operatives in Brazil and Spain

References

• Abílio, Ludmila Costhek (2020) ‘Digital platforms and uberization. towards the globalization of an administrated south?’, Contracampo Brazilian Journal Of Communication 39(1): 12–26.
   Google Scholar
• Adigital (2020) Importancia económica de las plataformas digitales de delivery y perfil de los repartidores. Spain: Adigital.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin, Laurence (1977) ‘Análise de conteúdo’, Lisboa: Edições 70.
   Google Scholar
• Benvegnù, Carlotta, et al. (2021). Platform Battlefield: Digital Infrastructures in Capitalism 4.0. South Atlantic Quarterly 120(4): 689–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunders, Damion Jonathan, et al. (2022) ‘The feasibility of platform cooperatives in the gig economy’, Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management 10(1): 100167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheron, Cibele, Julice Salvagni and Renato Colomby (2022) “Homem só respeita homem”: quando o machismo invisibiliza duplamente o trabalho das entregadoras por plataformas. XLVI Encontro da ANPAD – EnANPAD.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, Sasha (2020) Design Justice: Community-led Practices to Build the Worlds we Need, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Peuter, Greig and Dyer-Witheford, Nick (2010) ‘Commons and cooperatives’, Affinities: A journal of radical theory, culture, and action 4(1): 30–56.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignacio, Catherine and Lauren Klein (2020) Data Feminism, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, Nick (2014) ‘The global worker and the digital front’. In: Fuchs, Christian, and Marisol Sandoval (eds.), Critique, Social Media and the Information Society. New York: Routledge, 165–178.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, Nick (2015) Cyber-Proletariat: Global Labour in the Digital Vortex. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Benjamin G. and Michael Luca (2014) ‘Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com’, Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper (14–54).
   Google Scholar
• Englert, S. P., Jamie Woodcock and Callum Cant (2020) ‘“Digital workerism: technology, platforms, and the circulation of workers’ struggles.” triplec: communication, capitalism & Critique’, Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 18(1): 132–145.
   Google Scholar
• Fairwork. (2021) Fairwork 2021 Annual Report. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, Silvia (2020) Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, Oakland: PM press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernàndez, Aina and M. Soliña Barreiro (2020) ‘The algorithm is not my boss anymore: technological appropriation and (new) media strategies in riders x derechos and Mensakas’, Contracampo Brazilian Journal Of Communication 39(1): 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Fabian and Mark Graham (2021) ‘Fissures in algorithmic power: platforms, code, and contestation’, Cultural Studies 35 (4-5): 814–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster Morell, Mayo (2022) ‘The gender of the platform economy’, Internet Policy. Review 11(1): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuster Morell, Mayo, Ricard Espelt, and Melissa Renau Cano (2020) ‘Sustainable platform economy: Connections with the sustainable development goals’, Sustainability 12(18): 7640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebrial, Dalia (2022) ‘Racial platform capitalism: empire, migration and the making of uber in London’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54(3), 0308518X221115439.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind. (2000) ‘Speech analysis’, in Martin W. Bauer and George Gaskell (eds.) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound: A Practical Handbook for Social Research, New York: Sage, 244–270.
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann, Rafael (2021) ‘Rider platforms? building worker-owned experiences in Spain, France, and Brazil’, South Atlantic Quarterly 12(4): 839–852.
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann, Rafael (2018) ‘Cooperativismo de plataforma e suas contradições: análise de iniciativas da área de comunicação no platform.coop’, Liinc em Revista 14(1): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Grohmann, Rafael (2014) O que o campo da comunicação tem a dizer sobre as classes sociais? Intexto 31(1): 180–196.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, Richard, et al. (2021) ‘Digital platforms and institutional voids in developing countries: The case of ride-hailing markets’, World Development 145: 1–13, 105528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill-Collins, Patricia and Sirma Bilge (2020) Interseccionalidade, São Paulo: Boitempo.
   Google Scholar
• Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (2021) Trabalho precário e informalidade: desprecarizando suas relações conceituais e esquemas analíticos. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA. Avaiable: http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/10948/1/td_2707.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, Kylie. (2020) ‘Digital labor’, in Karen Ross (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication (1–5), New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, Kylie (2014) ‘‘The relevance of “women’s work” social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media’’, Television & new Media 15(1): 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Aroha Moana (2019) ‘#Bodypositive: Performances of Body Positivity by Influencers on Instagram’, master of Science in Psychology (Health Endorsement) at Massey University, Albany Campus, Aotearoa/New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, Naila. (2021) ‘Three faces of agency in feminist economics: capabilities, empowerment, and citizenship’, in Günseli Berik and Ebru Kongar (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics (99–107), Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Katyal, Sonia K. and Jessica Y. Jung (2021) ‘The gender panopticon: AI, gender, and design Justice’, UCLA Law Review 68(3): 692–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Caitlin E. (2018) ‘Platform Feminism: Celebrity Culture and Activism in the Digital Age’. (doctoral thesis) in the University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, Gabriella (2020) Invisibility by Design: Women and Labor in Japan’s Digital Economy, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, Gabriella (2015a) ‘Labor games: youth, work, and politics in east Asia’, Positions: Asia Critique 23(3): 381–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukács, Gabriella (2015b) ‘The labor of cute: net idols, cute culture, and the digital economy in contemporary Japan’, Positions: Asia Critique 23(3): 487–513. doi:10.1215/10679847-3125863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, Lais Virginia Alves (2021) ‘“Uma minoria ainda mais vulnerável”: uma análise discursiva sobre entregadoras de aplicativo’, Leitura 69: 247–260.
   Google Scholar
• Milkman, Ruth, et al. (2021) ‘Gender, class, and the gig economy: The case of platform-based food delivery’, Critical Sociology 47(3): 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny (2013) To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, James (2022) Platform Socialism. How to Reclaim our Digital Future from Big Tech, London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, Jack Linchuan, Melissa Gregg and Kate Crawford (2014) ‘Circuits of labour: A labour theory of the iPhone era’, TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 12(2): 564–581.
   Google Scholar
• Rathi, Aayush Akash Sheshadri and Ambika Tandon (2022) ‘Feminist design practices: reflections on the communication and translation of feminist Research’, APRIA Journal 4(4): 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, Marisol (2016) ‘What would rosa do? Co-operatives and radical politics’, Soundings 63: 98–111.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, Marisol (2020) ‘Entrepreneurial activism? platform cooperativism between subversion and co-optation’, Critical Sociology 46(6): 801–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, Trebor (2016) Platform Cooperativism. Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy, New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Schor, Juliet (2020) After the gig: How the sharing economy got hijacked and how to win it back. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senabre Hidalgo, Enric, and Mayo Fuster Morell (2020) ‘Co-designed strategic planning and agile project management in academia: Case study of an action research group’, Palgrave Communications 5(1): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Soriano, Cheryll Ruth R. and Jason Vincent A. Cabañes (2020) ‘Entrepreneurial solidarities: social media collectives and Filipino digital platform workers’, Social Media & Society 6(2): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Anthea and Joanna McIntyre2020). Gender and Australian Celebrity Culture, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell and Martijn De Waal (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, Niels (2017) ‘Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’economy’, Information, Communication & Society 20(6): 898–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, Niels (2019) On the conditions of possibility for worker organizing in platform-based gig economies: Reflections on Platform Labour. Notes from Below 8(1).
   Google Scholar
• Verma, Karishma (2018) ‘#digitalactivism: Examining #yesallwomen And Teaching Social Media Activism In Technical Communication’ (Masters dissertation), Illinois State University.
   Google Scholar
• Zanatta, Rafael (2022) Building Platform Cooperatives in Brazil, New York: Platform Cooperativism Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Natasha A. and Qian Zhang (2020) ‘Careers delivered from the kitchen? immigrant women small-scale entrepreneurs working in the growing nordic platform Economy’, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 28(2): 113–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Alex (2015) ‘Control societies and platform logic’, New Formations 84(84-85): 209–227.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfson, Todd et al. (2022) ‘Alongside but not in front’, Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation 16(1): 104–120.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, Jamie (2021a) The Fight against Platform Capitalism: an Inquiry into the Global Struggles of the Gig Economy. University of Westminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, Jamie (2021b) ‘The limits of algorithmic management: on platforms, data, and workers’ struggle, South Atlantic Quarterly 120(4): 703–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, Jamie and Graham, Mark (2019) The Gig Economy. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Erik Olin (2010) Envisioning real utopias. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar