Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions

References

• Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 84–94. 10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaree, H. E., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2006). The factor structure of static actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 207–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2001). Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 490–521. 10.1177/009385480102800406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaree, H. E., Seto, M. C., & Maric, A. (1995). Sex offender characteristics, response to treatment, and correctional release decisions at the Warkworth Sexual Behaviour Clinic ( Research report 1996–73), Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bartosh, D. L., Garby, T., Lewis, D., & Gray, S. (2003). Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 422–438. 10.1177/0306624X03253850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31–63. 10.1016/j.avb.2003.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, D. P., Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., & Webster, C. D. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk—20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Vancouver, BC: The Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J. (1996). Risk–needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Proulx, J.2008. Predictive and convergent validity of phallometric assessment in relation to sexual recidivism risk. Poster presented at the 27th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Butz-Whittaker, J. W., Strassberg, D. S., & Centre for Family Development2001. The sex offender treatment outcome predictor–static/dynamic (SOTOP-S/D). Poster session presented at the 20th annual conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F. (2009). Factors associated with sexual recidivism. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook (pp. 39–52). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Doren, D. M. (2004). Towards a multidimensional model for sexual recidivism risk. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 835–856. 10.1177/0886260504266882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epperson, D. L., Kaul, J. D., Huot, S. J., Hesselton, D., Alexander, W., & Goldman, R. (1998). Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool—revised (MnSOST-R). St Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry, & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 189–250). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 7
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3rd edn). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grubin, D.1998. Sex offending against children: Understanding the risk. Police Research Series Paper 99. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Guay, J.-P. (2006). Prédiction actuarielle et prédiction clinique : Le dernier souffle d'une pratique traditionnelle [Actuarial versus clinical prediction: The end of a tradition]. Revue internationale de criminologie et de police technique et scientifique, 59, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (1997). The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism ( user report 1997–04), Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (2002). Recidivism and age: Follow-up data from 4,673 sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 1046–1062. 10.1177/088626002236659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362. 10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Corrections Research user report no. 2004–02). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. 10.1037/a0014421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119–136. 10.1023/A:1005482921333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of Static–2002 ( Corrections Research user report 2003–01), Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (2nd edn). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A. J. R., Phenix, A., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Static-99 coding rules: Revised 2003. Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. A., Smallbone, S., Dennison, S., & Knight, R. A. (2009). Specialization and versatility in sexual offenders referred for civil commitment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 37–44. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 315–335. 10.1177/0093854893020004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus, L.2009. Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples ( Master's thesis). Carleton University, Ottawa, ON. Available from www.static99.org
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L. & Thornton, D.2012. Performance of individual items of Static-99R and Static-2002R: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2011). Assessing the risk of older sex offenders: Developing the Static-99R and Static-2002R ( Corrections Research user report 2011–01), Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision (2007, April). SO assessment information survey 4–2007. Retrieved from http://www.interstatecompact.org/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L., & Hess, D. T. (2007). Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 409–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G.2003. Factor analysis by MINRES. Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/minres.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. A., Guay, J. P., Grabell, A., & Thornton, D.2007. Creating distinct actuarial techniques for rapists and child molesters. Iowa City, IA. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Psychopathology.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, R. A. & Thornton, D.2007. Do different variables predict recidivism in rapists and child molesters?Seattle, WA. Paper presented at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, C. M., Harkins, L., Peacock, E. J., & Barbaree, H. E.2003. Core dimensions underlying risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders. Paper presented at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Lussier, P., LeBlanc, M., & Proulx, J. (2005). The generality of criminal behavior: A confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 177–189. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2004.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management: The safer society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, G., Guay, J.-P., & Knight, R. A. (2011). An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: One size doesn't fit all. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 188–209. 10.1177/0093854810388238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, J., Lussier, P., Ouimet, M., & Boutin, S. (2008). Criminal careers of four types of sexual aggressors. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), Sex offenders Vol. 6 (pp. 1–21). New York: Civic Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk (2nd edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. 10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. F., Doren, D. M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569–589. 10.1177/009385402236733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., Mailloux, D. L., & Malcolm, P. B. (2001). Psychopathy, deviant sexual arousal, and recidivism among sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 234–246. 10.1177/088626001016003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (2000). Attachment and coercive sexual behavior. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Theory, 12, 3–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th edn). New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989, 225–235. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07308.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar