Publication Cover
Journal of Sexual Aggression
An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice
Volume 20, 2014 - Issue 1
1,668
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Referrers' views of structured professional judgement risk assessment of sexual offenders: A qualitative study

, , , &

References

  • Bhugra, D., Easter, A., Mallaris, Y., & Gupta, S. (2011). Clinical decision making in psychiatry by psychiatrists. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 124, 403–411. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.webfeat.lib.ed.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01737.x/pdf.
  • Boyle, J., Kernohan, G. W., & Rush, T. (2009). ‘When you are tired or terrified your voice slips back into its old first place’: The role of feelings in community mental health practice with forensic patients. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23(3), 291–313. doi:10.1080/02650530903102635
  • Cooke, D. J., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 259–274. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9176-x
  • de Visser, R. O., & Smith, J. (2007). Alcohol consumption and masculine identity among young men. Psychology & Health, 22(5), 595–614. doi:10.1080/14768320600941772
  • Green, B., Carroll, A., & Brett, A. (2010). Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 18(6), 538–541. doi:10.3109/10398562.2010.498513
  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (2008). Shall evidence based risk assessment be abandonded? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 154. doi:10.1192/bjp.192.2.154
  • Hart, S. (2003). Assessing risk for sexual violence: The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Hart, S. (2008). Risk assessment: Sexual violence and the role of paraphillia. In A. J. Harris & C. A. Page (Eds.), Sexual homicide and paraphillias: The correctional service of Canada's experts forum 2007 (pp. 131–160). Ottowa: Correctional Service of Canada.
  • Hart, S., & Boer, D. (2010). Structured professional judgement guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The sexual violence risk-20 (SVR-20) and risk for sexual violence protocol. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment tools (pp. 269–294). Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
  • Hart, S., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP). Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
  • Hart, S., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hart, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. J. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the ‘margins of error’ of group versus individual predictions of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(S49), s60–s65. doi:10.1192/bjp.190.5.s60
  • Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 118–126. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
  • Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2006). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
  • Khiroya, R., Weaver, T., & Maden, T. (2009). Use and perceived utility of structured violence risk assessments in English medium secure units. Psychiatric Bulletin, 33, 129–132. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.108.019810
  • Kurtz, A., & Jeffcote, N. (2011). Everything contradicts in your mind: A qualitative study of experiences of forensic mental health staff in two contrasting services. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21, 245–258. doi:10.1002/cbm.796
  • Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C. (2011). Police empathy and victim PTSD as potential factors in rape case attrition. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26(2), 112–117. doi:10.1007/s11896-010-9075-6
  • McNaughton Nicholls, C., Mitchell, M., Simpson, I., Webster, S., & Hester, M. (2012). Attitudes to sentencing sexual offences. Sentencing Council Research Series (Vol. 01/12): Sentencing Council. Retrieved 1 February, 2013, from http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/docs/Attitudes_to_Sentencing_Sexual_Offences_(web).pdf.
  • Quayle, E. (2012). Framework analysis. In O. Kolpakova (Ed.), Online behaviour related to child sexual abuse: Focus groups' findings (pp. 19–20). Stockholm, Sweden: Risktaking Online Behaviour Empowerment through Research and Training (ROBERT). Retrieved from http://www.childcentre.info/robert/public/Focus_groups_findings.pdf
  • Risk Management Authority. (2006). Standards and guidelines for risk assessment. Paisley, Scotland: Author.
  • Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice. London, UK: Sage.
  • Russell, K., & Darjee, R. (2012). Managing the risk posed by personality-disordered sex offenders in the community: A model for providing structured clinical guidance to support criminal justice services. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk (pp. 88–114). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Scottish Government. (2010). MAPPA Edinburgh, Lothian and the borders multi agency public protection arrangements. Annual Report 2009/10 Retrieved 1 April, 2012, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/11/10112315/0
  • Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52–62. Retrived from http://nurseresearcher.rcnpublishing.co.uk/archive/article-qualitative-data-analysis-the-framework-approach.
  • Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Journal of Administration & Governance, 4(2), 72–79. Retrived from http://joaag.com/uploads/06_Research_Note_Srivastava_and_Thomson_4_2_.pdf.
  • Sutherland, A. A., Johnstone, L., Davidson, K. M., Hart, S., Cooke, D. J., Kropp, P. R., … Stocks, R. (2012). Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation of the interrater reliability of professional judgements made using the risk for sexual violence protocol. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 119–133. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.690020
  • Watt, K. A., Hart, S., Wilson, C., Guy, L., & Douglas, K. S. (2006). An evaluation of the risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP) in high risk offenders: Inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychology-Law Society, St Petersburg, FL, USA.
  • Watt, K. A., & Jackson, K. (2008). Inter-rater and structural reliabilities of the risk for sexual violence protocol. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vienna, Austria.
  • Webster, S., Davidson, J., Bifulco, A., Gottschalk, P., Caretti, V., Pham, T., … Graparo, G. (2012). European online grooming project: Final report. Retrieved 1 February, 2013, from http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/843993/european-online-grooming-project-final-report.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.