Publication Cover
Journal of Sexual Aggression
An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice
Volume 22, 2016 - Issue 2
442
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Some notes on the validation of VRS-SO static scores

, , , , &
Pages 147-160 | Received 30 May 2015, Accepted 28 Oct 2015, Published online: 20 Jan 2016

References

  • Allan, M., Grace, R. C., Rutherford, B., & Hudson, S. M. (2007). Psychometric assessment of dynamic risk factors for child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 347–367. doi:10.1177/107906320701900402
  • Barbaree, H. E., Langton, C. M., & Peacock, E. J. (2006). The factor structure of static actuarial items: Its relation to prediction. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 207–226. doi:10.1177/107906320601800207
  • Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2010). Assessment of dynamic risk factors: An independent validation study of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 234–251. doi:10.1177/1079063210369014
  • Beggs, S. M., & Grace, R. C. (2011). Treatment gains for sexual offenders against children predicts reduced recidivism: A comparative validity study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 182–192. doi:10.1037/a0022900
  • Brouillette-Alarie, S., Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & Helmus, L. (2015). Latent constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R: A three factor solution. Assessment. Ahead of print publication doi:10.1177/1073191114568114
  • Brouillette-Alarie, S., & Proulx, J. (2013). Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19, 311–328. doi:10.1080/13552600.2012.747630
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of static 2002. (User Report 2003-01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
  • Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sex offenders on community supervision (User Report No. 2007–05). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
  • Hanson, R. K., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2010). Predicting recidivism among sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198–211. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9180-1
  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154–1163. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1–21. doi:10.1037/a0014421
  • Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (User Report 99–02). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
  • Hare, R. D. (1991). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 64–101. doi:10.1177/1079063211409951
  • Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1148–1171. doi:10.1177/0093854812443648
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Langton, C. M., Barbaree, H. E., Hansen, K. T., Harkins, L., & Peacock, E. J. (2007). Reliability and validity of the static-2002 among adult sexual offenders with reference to treatment status. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 616–640. doi:10.1177/0093854806296851
  • Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217. doi:10.1177/1079063210366039
  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indices and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11, 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
  • Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2013). Mplus Version 7.11. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Nicholaichuk, T. P., Olver, M. E., Gu, D., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). Age, actuarial risk, and long-term recidivism in a national sample of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 406–428. doi:10.1177/1079063213492340
  • Olver, M. E., Beggs Christofferson, S. M., Grace, R. C., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). Incorporating change information into sexual offender risk assessments using the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26, 472–499. doi:10.1177/1079063213502679
  • Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., Kingston, D. A., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). A multisite examination of sexual violence risk and therapeutic change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 312–324. doi:10.1037/a0035340
  • Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Wong, S. C. P. (2014). The predictive and convergent validity of a psychometric battery used to assess sex offenders in a treatment program: An 18-year follow-up. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20, 216–239. doi:10.1080/13552600.2013.816791
  • Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2006). Psychopathy, sexual deviance, and recidivism among sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 65–82. doi:10.1007/s11194-006-9006-3
  • Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2011). A comparison of static and dynamic assessment of sexual offender risk and need in a treatment context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 113–126. doi:10.1177/0093854810389534
  • Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the violence risk scale-sexual offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
  • Parent, G., Guay, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (2011). An assessment of long-term risk of recidivism by adult sex offenders: One size doesn't fit all. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 188–209. doi:10.1177/0093854810388238
  • Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 615–620. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7
  • Roberts, C. F., Doren, D. M., & Thornton, D. (2002). Dimensions associated with assessments of sex offender recidivism risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 569–589. doi:10.1177/009385402236733
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Wong, S., Olver, M. E., Nicholaichuk, T. P., & Gordon, A. (2003). The violence risk scale: Sexual offender version (VRS-SO). Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.