Participative leadership and hierarchical structures in multiple perpetrator rape: replicating and extending a scale of influence among offenders

References

• Alison, L. J., Snook, B., & Stein, K. (2001). Unobtrusive measurement: Using police information for forensic research. Qualitative Research, 1, 241–254. doi: 10.1177/146879410100100208
   Google Scholar
• Allen, K. K. (2011). Guilt by (more than) association: The case for spectator liability in gang rapes. Georgetown Law Journal, 99, 837–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, M. (1971). Patterns in forcible rape, Ch. 12. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1971). Social Learning Theory. New York, NY: McCaleb-Seiler.
   Google Scholar
• Bijleveld, C. C. J. H., Weerman, F. M., Looije, D., & Hendriks, J. (2007). Group sex offending by juveniles: Coercive sex as a group activity. European Journal of Criminology, 4, 5–31. doi: 10.1177/1477370807071728
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, J. C., Horvath, M. A. H., & Kelly, L. (2010). A typology of multiple-perpetrator rape. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1114–1139. doi: 10.1177/0093854810377971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterell, J. (1996). Social networks and social influences in adolescence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, T., Harkins, L., & Woodhams, J. (2013). Multiple perpetrator rape as an international phenomenon. In M. Horvath & J. Woodhams (Eds.), Handbook of multiple perpetrator rape (pp. 10–36). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva, T., Woodhams, J., & Harkins, L. (2018). “An adventure that went wrong”: Reasons given by convicted perpetrators of multiple perpetrator sexual offending for their involvement in the offense. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 443–456. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1011-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancer, L. S. (1990). Suicide prediction and the partial order scalogram analysis of psychological adjustment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39(4), 479–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1990.tb01067.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S. H., & Curry, G. D. (2000). Addressing key features of gang membership: Measuring the involvement of young members. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 473–482. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2352(00)00063-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etgar, T., & Ganot-Prager, K. (2009). Advantages of group therapy for adolescent participants in the same gang rape. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18, 302–319. doi: 10.1080/10538710902881329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, K. (2004). Enacting masculinity: Antigay violence and group rape as participatory theater. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1, 25–40. doi: 10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.25
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1998). Facet theory: Its development and current status. European Psychologist, 3(1), 13–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkins, L., & Dixon, L. (2013). A multi-factorial approach to understanding multiple perpetrator sexual offending. In J. Wood & T. Gannon (Eds.), Crime and crime reduction: The importance of group processes (pp. 75–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, A. (2001). Opportunities and decision: Interactional dynamics in robbery and burglary groups. Criminology; An interdisciplinary Journal, 39(3), 737–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, M. A. H., & Kelly, L. (2009). Gang/group/multiple perpetrator rape: Naming an offence and initial research findings. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15(1), 83–97. doi: 10.1080/13552600802653818
   Google Scholar
• Lambine, M. (2013). Variations in multiple perpetrator rape characteristics relative to group size: Comparing duo and larger group MPR offences. In M. Horvath & J. Woodhams (Eds.), Handbook of multiple perpetrator rape (pp. 67–81). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., & Walmsley, R. (1989). Changes in rape offences and sentencing. Home Office research Study 105. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Looije, D., Bijleveld, C., Weerman, F., & Hendriks, J. (2004). Gedwongen seks als groepsactiviteit: een dossierstudie naar groepszedendelicten [Forced sex as a group activity: A file analysis of group sex offenses]. Tijdschrift voor seksuologie, 28, 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Polansky, N., Lippitt, R., & Redl, F. (1950). An investigation of behavioral contagion in groups. Human Relations, 3, 319–348. doi: 10.1177/001872675000300401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. E. (2008). Using archival data and multidimensional scaling to explore leadership: Examples from group crime. Issues in Forensic Psychology, 8, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. E. (2013). Leadership and role-taking in multiple perpetrator rape. In M. Horvath & J. Woodhams (Eds.), Handbook of multiple perpetrator rape (pp. 160–181). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. E., & Alison, L. J. (2001). A partially ordered scale of influence in violent group behavior: An example from gang rape. Small Group Research, 32(4), 475–497. doi: 10.1177/104649640103200405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. E., & Alison, L. J. (2006a). Examining group rape: A descriptive analysis of offender and victim behaviour. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 357–381. doi: 10.1177/1477370806065586
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. E., & Alison, L. J. (2006b). Leadership and hierarchies in criminal groups: Scaling degrees of leader behaviour in group robbery. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 245–265. doi: 10.1348/135532505X68692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scully, D., & Morolla, J. (1985). “Riding the bull at Gilley’s”: Convicted rapists describe the rewards of rape. Social Problems, 32(3), 251–263. doi: 10.2307/800685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1964). Reference groups. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Shye, S., Elizur, D., & Hoffman, M. (1994). Introduction to facet theory: Content design and intrinsic data analysis in behavioural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• ‘t Hart-Kerkhoffs, L. A., Vermeiren, R. R. J. M., Jansen, L. M. C., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2011). Juvenile group sex offenders: A comparison of group leaders and followers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3–20. doi: 10.1177/0886260510362882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. E. (1981). The social context of modeling. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 9(2), 129–137. doi: 10.2224/sbp.1981.9.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., & Ellis, G. (2008). Characteristics of youth leadership that influence adolescent peers to follow. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 26, 78–94.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society (2nd Edn). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhams, J., Cooke, C., Harkins, L., & da Silva, T. (2012). Leadership in multiple perpetrator stranger rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 728–752. doi: 10.1177/0886260511423244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar