How well do police specialists risk assess registered sexual offenders?

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88–100. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05282556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A., Craig, L. A., & Browne, K. (2009). Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, S., & Långström, N. (2007). Unguided clinical and actuarial assessment of re-offending risk: A direct comparison with sex offenders in Denmark. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 135–153. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, D., Hart, S., Kropp, P., & Webster, C. (1997). Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20. Burnaby, British Columbia: The Mental Health. Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Boer, D. P., Haaven, J., Lambrick, F., & Lindsay, W. R. (2006). Assessment of risk manageability for individuals with developmental and intellectual limitations who offend (ARMIDILO). Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the International Association for the treatment of sexual offenders (IATSO), Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/rsk-nd-rspnsvty/rsk-nd-rspnsvty-eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2007). Risk and need assessment. In G. McIvor & P. Raynor (Eds.), Developments in social work with offenders (pp. 131–152). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bosker, J., Witteman, C., & Hermanns, J. (2013). Do intervention plans meet criteria for effective practice to reduce recidivism? How probation officers forget about social capital and basic needs. European Journal of Probation, 5(1), 65–85. doi: 10.1177/206622031300500105
   Google Scholar
• College of Policing. (2016). ARMS practitioner guidance manual v.2.0.
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F. (2009). Factors associated with sexual recidivism. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: A handbook (pp. 39–52). Chichester: Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, L. A., Beech, A. R., & Harkins, L. (2009). The predictive accuracy of risk factors and frameworks. In A. R. Beech, L. A. Craig, & K. D. Browne (Eds.), Assessment and treatment of sex offenders: A handbook (pp. 53–74). Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., & Beech, A. R. (2008). Assessing risk in sex offenders: A practitioner's guide. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Douglas, K. S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 440–457. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Koster, K., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending With the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 51–70. doi: 10.1177/1079063214550168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 16–33. doi: 10.1177/1079063214547582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A., Scott, T., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project. Public Safety Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, R., & Ward, T. (2017). A comprehensive theory of dynamic risk and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 129–141. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Babchishin, K. M., & Thornton, D. (2015). Sex offender risk assessment with the Risk Matrix 2000: Validation and guidelines for combining with the STABLE-2007. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(2), 136–157. doi: 10.1080/13552600.2013.870241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus, L., Thornton, D., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2012). Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: Revised age weights. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24(1), 64–101. doi: 10.1177/1079063211409951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochstetler, A., Peters, D. J., & Copes, H. (2017). Supervisory experience and data points: Implementation barriers, risk assessment and correctional professionals. Criminal Justice Studies, 30(3), 240–256. doi: 10.1080/1478601X.2017.1293535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, C., & Craig, L. A. (2015). Adult sexual offender assessment. In D. P. Boer, R. Eher, L. A. Craig, M. H. Miner, & F. Pfäfflin (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice and research (pp. 13–33). Chicester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, S. M., Ambroziak, G., Thornton, D., & Barahal, R. M. (2018). How do professionals assess sexual recidivism risk? An updated survey of practices. Sexual Abuse, 0(0). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1079063218800474
   Google Scholar
• Kewley, S. (2017). Policing people with sexual convictions using strengths-based approaches. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 7(3), 168–182. doi: 10.1108/JCP-09-2016-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewley, S., Beech, A., Harkins, L., & Bonsall, H. (2015). Effective risk management planning for those convicted of sexual offending. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 7(4), 237–257. doi: 10.1108/JACPR-05-2015-0171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kewley, S., & Blandford, M. (2017). The development of the active risk management system. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 7(3), 155–167. doi: 10.1108/JCP-10-2016-0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, D. R., & Kropp, P. R. (2003). The promise and the peril of sex offender risk assessment. In T. Ward, D. R. Lawson, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 207–225). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luong, D., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(12), 1177–1199. doi: 10.1177/0093854811421596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholls, C. M., & Webster, S. (2014). Sex offender management and dynamic risk: Pilot evaluation of the Active Risk Management System (ARMS). Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sex-offender-management-and-dynamic-risk
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Wong, S. C. P., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the violence risk Scale-sexual offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318–329. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, L., & Williamson, H. (2018). Probation and parole officers’ compliance with case management tools: Professional discretion and override. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(14), 4565–4584. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18764851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer, H. L., Aylwin, S. A., Sribney, C., & Reddon, J. R. (2011). Uses, misues and abuses of risk assessment with sexual offenders. In D. P. Boer, R. Eher, L. A. Craig, M. H. Miner, & F. Pfäfflin (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Theory, practice and research (pp. 193–212). Sest Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, D., Mann, R., Webster, S., Blud, L., Travers, R., Friendship, C., & Erikson, M. (2003). Distinguishing and combining risks for sexual and violent recidivism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 225–235. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07308.x
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2017). Prediction and agency: The role of protective factors in correctional rehabilitation and desistance. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Beech, A. R. (2015). Dynamic risk factors: A theoretical dead-end? Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(2), 100–113. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.917854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Fortune, C.-A. (2016). The role of dynamic risk factors in the explanation of offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 29, 79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J., & Kemshall, H. (2010). Effective multi-agency public protection: Learning from the research. In K. Harrison (Ed.), Managing high-risk sex offenders in the community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibility (pp. 39–60). Cullompton: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Wormith, J. S., Hogg, S., & Guzzo, L. (2012). The predictive validity of a general risk/needs assessment inventory on sexual offender recidivism and an exploration of the professional override. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1511–1538. doi: 10.1177/0093854812455741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar