No man’s land: the denial of victimisation in male statutory rape cases

References

• Abrams, J. R. (2010). The collateral consequences of masculinizing violence. William and Mary Journal of Women and Law, 16, 703–751.
   Google Scholar
• Aiken, J. H. (1983). Differentiating sex from sex: The male irresistible impulse. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 12(2), 357–384.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, T. M. (2002). Gender-neutral statutory rape laws: Legal fictions disguised as remedies to male child exploitation. University of Detroit-Mercy Law Review, 80, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Andre-Clark, A. S. (1992). Whither statutory rape laws: Of Michael M., the fourteenth amendment and protecting women from sexual aggression. Southern California Law Review, 65(4), 1933–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelides, S. (2008). Sexual offences against children and the question of judicial gender bias. Australian Feminist Studies, 23(57), 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierie, D., & Davis-Siegel, J. C. (2015). Measurement matters: Comparing old and new definitions of rape in federal statistical reporting. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(5), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boney-McCoy, S., & Finkelhor, D. (1995). Psychosocial sequelae of violent victimization in a national youth sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 726–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote, D., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brief for Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County as Amicus Curiae supporting respondents, 1980 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs Lexis 2153.
   Google Scholar
• Brief for Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County as Amicus Curiae supporting respondents, 1980 U.S. S. Ct. Briefs Lexis 2571.
   Google Scholar
• Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Women, men, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, C. M., & Beckson, M. (2011). Male victims of sexual assault: Phenomenology, psychology, physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 39, 197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Penal Code Section 261.5 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Chapleau, K., Oswald, D., & Russell, B. (2008). Male rape myths: The role of gender, violence, and sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(5), 600–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocca, C. E. (2002). From “welfare queen” to “exploited teen”: Welfare dependency, statutory rape, and moral panic. NWSA Journal, 14(2), 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Jonathan Jacob Hatfield, 929 S.W.2d 200 (Ky. Ct. App.,1996).
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on sex, class, and culture. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. (1998). Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities, 1(1), 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• County of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J., 50 Cal. App.4th 842, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, R. M. (1986). Violence and the word. The Yale Law Journal, 95(8), 1601–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, T., & Utley, E. (2018). She touched me: Five snapshots of adult sexual violations of black boys. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 28(2), 205–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2002). Male sexual assault victims: A selective review of the literature and implications for support services. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2004). Correlates of negative attitudes toward gay men: Sexism, male role norms, and male sexuality. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Gilston, J., & Rogers, P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance, female rape myth acceptance, victim blame, homophobia, gender roles, and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(14), 2807–2823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Pollard, P., & Archer, J. (2006). Effects of perpetrator gender and victim sexuality on blame toward male victims of sexual assault. The Journal of Social Psychology, 146(3), 275–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., & Rogers, P. (2006). Perceptions of male victims in depicted sexual assaults: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(4), 367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2003). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 303–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamanduros, T., Cosentino, C. E., Tysinger, P. D., & Tysinger, J. A. (2012). Theoretical perspectives of male sexual abuse: Conceptualization of a case study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(2), 131–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D., & Kenyon, S. (1996). “Honey, we don’t do men”: Gender stereotypes and the provision of services to sexually assaulted men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(3), 441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, A. (1998). Can a child say yes? How the unwelcomeness requirement has thwarted the purpose of Title IX. Journal of Law and Education, 27(3), 505–510.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, J. (2010). Masculinity of men communicating abuse victimization. Culture, Society and Masculinities, 2(1), 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, I., Berkowitz King, R., & Furstenberg, F. (1999). Adolescent females: Their sexual partners and the fathers of their children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(1), 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrich, S. (1987). Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. N. (2014). Compensating victims of crime. New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D. (1979). What’s wrong with sex between adults and children? Ethics and the problem of sexual abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49(4), 692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D. (1984). Challenges facing child protection and mental health professionals. In E. Ullman & W. Hilwig (Eds.), Childhood and trauma: Separation, abuse, war (pp. 101–115). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., & Dzuiba-Leatherman, J. (1994). Children as victims of violence: A national survey. Pediatrics, 94(4), 413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelhor, D., & Hashima, P. Y. (2001). The victimization of children. In K. White (Ed.), Handbook of youth and justice (pp. 49–78). New York: Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H. (2009). Sexual scripts, sexual refusals, and rape. In M. A. H. Horvath & J. M. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 99–122). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S. F. (2004). Male sexual assault: Issues of arousal and consent. Cleveland State Law Review, 51, 93–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fulgoni-Britton, R. (2009). Drawing a line of the blackboard: Why high school students cannot welcome sexual relationships with their teachers. Indiana Law Journal, 42(1), 257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Galvan, A., Hare, T., Voss, H., Glover, G., & Casey, B. (2007). Risk-taking and the adolescent brain: Who is at risk? Developmental Science, 10(2), F8–F14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnefski, N., & Arends, E. (1998). Sexual abuse and adolescent maladjustment: Differences between male and female victims. Journal of Adolescence, 21(1), 99–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnefski, N., & Diekstra, R. (1997). Child sexual abuse and emotional and behavioral problems in adolescence: Gender differences. Journal of the American Academy of Child Adolescence and Psychiatry, 36(3), 323–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. (2013). Law’s limits: Regulating statutory rape law. Wisconsin Law Review, 2, 481–540.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, R. (2006). Male rape and the careful construction of the male victim. Social & Legal Studies, 15(2), 187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrina, B. (1998). Mitigating punishment for statutory rape. The University of Chicago Law Review, 65(4), 1251–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherton, J. (1999). The idealization of women: Its role in the minimization of child sexual abuse by females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(2), 161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higdon, M. J. (2015). Marginalized fathers and demonized mothers: A feminist look at the reproductive freedom of unmarried men. Alabama Law Review, 66(3), 507–549.
   Google Scholar
• Higginson, J. (1999). Defining, excusing, and justifying deviance: Teen mothers’ accounts for statutory rape. Symbolic Interaction, 22(1), 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, D. A., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Statutory sex crime relationships between juveniles and adults: A review of social scientific research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 300–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlavka, H. R. (2017). Speaking of stigma and the silence of shame: Young men and sexual victimization. Men and Masculinities, 20(4), 482–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollenberg, E. (1999). The criminalization of teenage sex: Statutory rape and the politics of teenage motherhood. Stanford Law Policy Review, 10(2), 267–286.
   Google Scholar
• In re Parentage of J.S., 550 N.E.2d 257 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• In re Paternity of J.L.H. v. L.H., 149 Wis. 2d 349 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• In the Matter of the Paternity of K.B. v. Department of Human Services. 104 P.3d 1132 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R., Timko, C., & Carli, L. L. (1985). Cognitive biases in blaming the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2014). Male rape, stereotypes, and unmet needs: Hindering recovery, perpetuating silence. Violence and Gender, 3(1), 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid, A. (2016). Feminism, masculinity and male rape: Bringing male rape ‘out of the closet’. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(3), 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevning v. Chicos, 499 N.W. 2d 515 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2002). Inequality from gender-neutral laws: Why must male victims of statutory rape pay child support for children resulting from their victimization. Georgia Law Review, 36, 411–463.
   Google Scholar
• Kalt, B. (1998). Wade H. McCree, Jr. and the office of the solicitor general, 1977-1981. Michigan State University College of Law, 3, 703–751.
   Google Scholar
• Kassing, L., Beesley, D., & Frey, L. (2005). Gender role conflict, homophobia, age, and education as predictors of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27(4), 311–328.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, M. S. (2005). Men, masculinity and the rape culture. In E. Buchwald, P. R. Fletcher, & M. Roth (Eds.), Transforming a rape culture (pp. 139–157). Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kitrosser, H. (1996). Meaningful consent: Toward a new generation of statutory rape laws. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 4(2), 287–338.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, K. L. (2006a). No penis, no problem. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(2), 373–379.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, K. L. (2006b). The intimacy discount: Prosecutorial discretion, privacy, and equality in the statutory rape caseload. Emory Law Journal, 55, 691–748.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, K. L. (2009). When gender meets sex: An exploratory study of women who seduce adolescent boys. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 15(2), 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• L.M.E. v. A.R.S., 261 Mich. App. 273 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, M., & Rogers, P. (2017). The scope of male rape: A selective review of research, policy and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manlove, J., Terry-Humen, E., Ikramullah, E., & Moore, K. A. (2006). The role of parent religiosity in teens’ transition to sex and contraception. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39(4), 578–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloon v. Helgemoe, 564 F.2d 602 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Meloy, M. L., & Miller, S. L. (2009). Words that wound: Print media’s presentation of gendered violence. In D. Humpries (Ed.), Women, violence, and the media: Readings in feminist criminology (pp. 29–56). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer County Dept. of Social Services v. Alf N., 589 N.Y. 2d 288 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, J. (2004). Flesh and blood: Adolescent gender diversity and violence. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, G., & King, M. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19(1), 205–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma County, 450 U.S. 464 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H., Miller, C., Kenney, L., & Clark, J. (1998). Issues in statutory rape law enforcement: The views of district attorneys in Kansas. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(4), 177–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J. (2014). Doing crime as doing gender? Masculinities, femininities, and crime. In R. Gartner & B. McCarthy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender, sex, and crime (pp. 19–39). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Corrections. (2012). 50 state survey of sexual offenses against children (statutory rape). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Oliver, P. (1998). Gender and the construction of consent in child-adult sexual contact beyond gender neutrality and male monopoly. Gender and Society, 12(5), 554–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.J. Department of Law and Public Safety. (2004). Attorney general standards for providing services to victims of sexual assault (2nd ed.). Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Law and Public Policy: Division of Criminal Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Norman-Eady, S., Reinhart, C., & Martino, P. (2003). Statutory rape laws by state (OLR Research Report). Hartford, CT: Connecticut General Assembly. Retrieved from http://www.cga.ct.gov/2003/orldata/jud/rpt/2003-R-0376.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oberman, M. (2000). Regulating consensual sex with minors: Defining a role for statutory rape. Buffalo Law Review, 48, 703–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olekalns, M., & Smith, P. L. (2009). Mutually dependent: Power, trust, affect and the use of deception in negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri, R. (2000). Statutory rape law and enforcement in the wake of welfare reform. Stanford Law Review, 52, 463–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olszewski, D. J. (2006). Statutory rape in Wisconsin: History, rationale, and the need for reform. Marquette Law Review, 89(3), 693–719.
   Google Scholar
• People v. Weidiger, 96 Misc.2d 978 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California v. Van De Kamp. 181 Cal.App.3d 245 (Ct. App., 1986).
   Google Scholar
• Raitt, F. E., & Zeedyk, M. S. (1997). Rape trauma syndrome: Its corroborative and educational roles. Journal of Law and Society, 24(Dec., 1997), 552–568.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. (2011). Bab, bad teacher?: How judicial lenience, cultural ignorance, and media hype have inevitably lead to lighter sentences, underreporting and glamorization of female sex offenders. Whittier Journal of Child & Family Advocacy, 11(2), 353–374.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, J. M., & Cadena, C. H. G. (2006). Masculinity, machismo and their relation with some familiar variables. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 1–20). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V., & Farley, F. (2006). Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(1), 1–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, E., & De Luca, R. (2001). Male sexual abuse: A review of effects, abuse characteristics, and links with later psychological functioning. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(1), 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sariola, H., & Uutela, A. (1994). The prevalence of child sexual abuse in Finland. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18(10), 827–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schierenbeck v. Mary K. Minor, 367 P.2d 333 (1961).
   Google Scholar
• Schrock, D., & Schwalbe, M. (2009). Men, masculinity, and manhood acts. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 277–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2010). Male rape victim and perpetrator blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(6), 969–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. V. (2012). Uncomfortable places, close spaces: Female correctional workers’ sexual interactions with men and boys in custody. UCLA Law Review, 59, 1690–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B. V. (2015). Boys, rape, and masculinity: Reclaiming boys’ narratives of sexual violence in custody. North Carolina Law Review, 93(5), 1560–1640.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24(1), 101–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stahl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 239–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State v. Rundlett, 391 A2d 815 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• State of New Jersey v. Pamela Diehl-Moore. (2002). Case number: BERO1001224-001. Bergen, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: What changes and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021(1), 51–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (2012). Should the science of adolescent brain development inform public policy? American Psychologist, 64(8), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Stemple, L., Flores, A., & Meyer, I. (2016). Sexual victimization perpetrated by women: Federal data reveal surprising prevalence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 34, 302–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stennis, J. (2006). Equal protection dilemma: Why male adolescent students need federal protection from adult female teachers who prey on them. Journal of Law & Education, 35(3), 395–403.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria. In S. A. Ward & L. J. Reed (Eds.), Knowledge structure and use: Implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 343–362). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troup-Leasure, K., & Snyder, H. (2005). Statutory rape known to law enforcement. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Turchik, J., & Edwards, K. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(2), 211–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2012). Attorney general Eric Holder announces revisions to the uniform crime report’s definition of rape. Washington, DC: Office of Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). National incident-based reporting system, changes concerning rape data. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. (2019). 2019 National incident-based reporting system user manual. Washington, DC: Law Enforcement Support Section.
   Google Scholar
• van der Bruggen, M., & Grubb, A. R. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(5), 523–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojdik, V. K. (2002). Gender outlaws: Challenging masculinity in traditionally male institutions. Berkeley Women’s Law Journal, 17(1), 68–121.
   Google Scholar
• Vojdik, V. K. (2014). Sexual violence against men and women in war: A masculinities approach. Nevada Law Journal, 14, 923–952.
   Google Scholar
• Walfield, S. (2018). “Men cannot be raped”: Correlates of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260518817777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watkins, B., & Bentovim, A. (1992). The sexual abuse of male children and adolescents: A review of current research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(1), 197–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K. (2009). “Boys will be boys” and other gendered accounts: An exploration of victims’ excuses and justifications for unwanted sexual contact and coercion. Violence Against Women, 15(7), 810–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, K. G. (2010). Male sexual victimization: Examining men's experiences of rape and sexual assault. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 275–298.
   Google Scholar
• Wempe, R. P. (1993). Family law: Children having children – a father’s age is irrelevant for purposes of determining parental responsibility State Ex Rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P. 2d 1273 (Kan. 1993). Washburn Law Journal, 33(1), 247–262.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. J. (1998). Boys and sexual abuse: An English opinion. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(6), 539–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig, J., Newmark, L., Denver, M., & Raja, D. (2014). Who pays for sexual assault medical forensic exams? It is not the victim’s responsibility. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar