Comparison of High Velocity Low Amplitude Manipulation With Cavitation Verses Non-Cavitation: Effect Upon Atlanto-axial Rotation Asymmetry in Asymptomatic Subjects

References

• Conway P W, Herzog W, Zhang Y, Hasler E M, Ladfy K. (1993). Forces required to cause cavitation during spinal manipulation of the thoracic Spine. Clinical Biomechanics; 8:210–214.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoz R. (1976). Some physical mechanisms and effects of spinal adjustment. Ann Swiss Chiropractic Assoc; 6: 91–141.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy J D, Quon J A, Lafrance L J, Yong-Hing K. (1992). The effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: A pilot Study. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 15(8): 495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Roston J B, Haines R W. (1947). Cracking in the metacarpophalangeal joint. J Anat; 81:165–73.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth A, Dowson D, Wright V. (1972). Cracking joints: A bioengineering study of cavitation in the metacarpophalangeal joint. Ann Rheum Dis; 30: 348–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mierau D, Cassidy J, Bowen V, Dupuis P, Notfall F. (1988). Manipulation and mobilisation of the third metacarpophalangeal joint: A quantitative radiographic and range of motion study. Manual Med; 3:135–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur R. (1995). The audible release associated with joint manipulation. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 18(3): 155–164.
   Google Scholar
• Nansel D, Peneff A, Cremata E, Carlson J. (1990). Time course consideration for the effect of unilateral lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical lateral flexion passive end-range asymmetry. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 13:297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Nansel D, Cremata E, Carlson J, Szalzak M. (1989). Effect of unilateral spinal adjustments on goniometrically assessed cervical lateral flexion end-range asymmetries in otherwise asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 12: 419–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson N, Christensen H, Hartvigsen J. (1996). Lasting changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation: A randomised, blind, controlled trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 3:165–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wyke B D. (1967). The neurology of cervical spinal joints. Physiotherapy; 65: 72–6.
   Google Scholar
• Haldeman S. (2000). Neurologic effects of the adjustment. Journal of Manipulative and Physiologic Therapeutics; 23(2):112–114.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura J. (1989). Electrodiagnosis in Disease of Nerve and Muscle: Principles and Practice. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis & Co. 356–374.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler R E. (1997). In Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Pennsylvania: Williams and Wilkins. 661 – 666.
   Google Scholar
• Greenman P. (1989). Principles of Manual Medicine. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kimberly P E. (1976). Formulating a prescription for osteopathic manipulative treatment. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association; 75:486–499.
   Google Scholar
• lai H, Moriya H, Takahashi K Tamaki T. (1993). Three dimensional motion analysis of the upper cervical spine during axial rotation; Spine, 16:2388–2392.
   Google Scholar
• Crisco J, Panjabi M, Dvorak J. (1991). A model of the alar ligaments of the upper cervical spine in axial rotation. Journal of Biomechanics; 24(7): 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• DiGiovanna E L, Schiowitz S. (1991). An Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment. Pennsylvania: J.B. Lippincott Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dvorak J, Dvorak V. (1990) Manual Medicine: Diagnostics. 2nd Ed. New York, Theime Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman L. (1987) Handbook of Osteopathic Technique. South Melbourne: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Surkitt D, Gibbons P, McLaughlin P. (2000). High velocity low amplitude manipulation of the atlanto-axial joint: Effect on atlanto-axial and cervical spine rotation asymmetry in asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine; 3(1):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Penning L (1978). Normal movements of the cervical spine. Journal of Roentgenology. 130 (2): 317 –326.
   Google Scholar
• Guth M. (1995). A comparison of cervical rotation in age-matched adolescent competitive swimmers and healthy males. Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy; 21(1): 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wong A, Nansel D. (1992) Comparisons between active vs. passive end-range assessments in subjects exhibiting cervical range of motion asymmetries. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 15(3): 159–63.
   Google Scholar
• Nansel D, Peneff A. (1990) Effects of subject eye closure on goniometrically assessed cervical lateral flexion passive end range capability. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics; 13(6): 349 – 50
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard A. (1972). Manual of Osteopathic Technique. London: Hutchison Medical Publications. 111–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdillon J. (1992). Spinal Manipulation. Butterworth-Heinemann; 263–265.
   Google Scholar
• Ward R, Jerome J. (1997). Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 544, 664–68.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P, Tehan P. (2000) Manipulation of the spine, thorax and pelvis: An osteopathic perspective. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Hole D, Cook J, Bolton J. (1995). Reliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: Effects of age and gender. Manual Therapy; 1: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Associate Professor Peter Gibbons MB, BS, DO, DM-SMed. is Head, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Human Development, and his co-author is Anthony Collins B.Sc (Clinical Sciences), M.H.Sc
   Google Scholar