The Short-Term Effect of Manipulation and Mobilization on Pain and Range of Motion in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain

References

• Aprill C, Bogduk N. The Prevalence of Cervical Zygopophysial Joint Pain: A First Approximation. Spine 1992; 17: 744 –747.
   Google Scholar
• Assendeift WJ, Koes BW, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM. The efficacy of chiropractic manipulation for back pain: blinded review of relevant randomized clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15(8): 487–494.
   Google Scholar
• Bogduk N. Neck Pain : An Update, Aust Fain Physician 1988; 1 7(2):75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bovim G, Schrader H, Sand T. Neck pain in the general population. Spine 1994;19:1307–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Quon JA, LaFrance U, Yong-Hing K. The effect of manipulation on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15:495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hing K. The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992; 15(9):570–575.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson JC. Orthopedic manual therapy-an overview. Part II: the spine. Phys Ther 1979; 59(3):259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Cote P, Mior SA, Vernon H. The short-term effect of a spinal manipulation on pain/pressure threshold in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1994; 1 7(6):364–368.
   Google Scholar
• Cynax J. Textbook of Orthopedic Medicine: Treatment by Manipulation, massage and injection, 11th.ed , London :Bailliere Tindall, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dartigues JF, Henry P, Puymirat E, Commenges D, Peytour P, Gagnon M. Prevalence and risk factors of recurrent cervical pain syndrome in a working population. Neuroepidemiology 1988; 7(2):99–l 05.
   Google Scholar
• Di Fabio RP. Efficacy of Manual Therapy, Phys Ther 1992; 72(12):853–864.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell JP. Cervical Passive Mobilization Techniques: The Australian Approach, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews 1990; 4(2):309–334.
   Google Scholar
• Frieden RA. Conservative Management of Neck Pain. Mt Sinai J Med 1994; 61(3): 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve GP. Manipulation Therapy for Neck Pain. Physiotherapy 1979; 65(5): 136–146.
   Google Scholar
• Gross AR, Aker PD, Quarterly C. Manual Therapy in the treatment of neck pain. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1996; 22(3):579–598.
   Google Scholar
• Haldeman S.Spinal Manipulative Therapy. A status report. Gun Orth Related Res 1983; 179:62–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AD, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine 1996; 21(15): 1746–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, Hansen FR, Host D, Winkel A.Intensive Training, Physiotherapy, or Manipulation for Patients with Chronic Neck Pain. Spine 1998; 23(3):31 1–319.
   Google Scholar
• Koes 6W, Bouter LM, Knipshild PG, Van Mameren H, Essers A, Houben JP, Verstegen GM, Hofhuizen DM. The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy and continued treatment by the general practitioner for chronic nonspecific back and neck complaints: design of a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14:498–502.
   Google Scholar
• Lowden TA, Keating JC, Meeker WC.A Multivariate time-senes descriptive case study of chiropractic care in the treatment of cervical pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1986; 9(4):267–277.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz U.Evaluation of manipulation and other manual therapy. Criteria for measuring the effect of treatment. Scan J Rehabil Med 1979; 11 (4):1 73–179.
   Google Scholar
• Nansel D, Peneff A, Cremata E, Carison J. Time course considerations for the effects of unilateral lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical lateralflexion passive end-range asymmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990; 1 3(6):297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson N, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J. Lasting changes in passive range of motion after spinal manipulation: a randomized, blind, controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996; 19(3):165–168.
   Google Scholar
• Pans SV. Spinal Manipulative Therapy. Clin Ortho Related Res 1983; 179:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Pellecchia GL, Paolino J, Cornell J. Intertester Reliability of the Cyriax Evaluation in Assessing Patients with Shoulder Pain. JOSPT 1996; 23(1):34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers RG.The Effects of spinal manipulation on cervical kinesthesia in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997; 20(2):80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney T, Prentice C, Saal JA, Saal JS. Cervicothoracic Muscular Stabilization Techniques. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews 1990; 4(2) :335–359.
   Google Scholar
• Swezey RL. Essential Therapies for Joint, Soft Tissue and Disk Disorders: Cervical region. Physical Medicine and RehabilitatiomState of the Art Reviews 1988; 2(1):5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tan JC, Nordin M. Role of physical therapy in the treatment of cervical disk disease. Orthop Clin North Am 1992; 23(3):435–449.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon HT, Aker P, Bums 5, Viljakaanen 5, Short L. Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990; 13(1):13–16.
   Google Scholar