Perceptual and response-related components of unilateral neglect may evolve independently of one another: Evidence from five single-case studies

REFERENCES

• Albert, M. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J. J. S., & Black, S. E. (1998). Line bisection in hemianopia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 64, 660–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach, E. (1999). Unilateral neglect and related disorders. In G. Denes & L. Pizzamiglio (Eds.), Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology (pp. 479–495). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bisiach, E., Geminiani, G., Berti, A., & Rusconi, M. L. (1990). Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology, 40, 1278–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach, E., Ricci, R., Lualdi, M., & Colombo, M. R. (1998). Perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: Two modified versions of the Milner Landmark task. Brain and Cognition, 37, 369–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach, E., Rusconi, M. L., Peretti, V., & Vallar, G. (1994). Challenging current accounts of unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1431–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottini, G., & Toraldo, A. (2003). The influence of contralesional targets on the cancellation of ipsilesional targets in unilateral neglect. Brain and Cognition, 53, 117–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buiatti, T., Mussoni, A., Toraldo, A., Skrap, M., & Shallice, T. (2011). Two qualitatively different impairments in making rotation operations. Cortex, 47, 166–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitani, E., Neppi-Modona, M., & Bisiach, E. (2000). Verbal-response and manual-response versions of the Milner landmark task: Normative data. Cortex, 36, 593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A. (1995). Cross-over completion and confabulation in unilateral spatial neglect. Brain, 118, 455–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubelli, R., Nichelli, P., Bonito, V., De Tanti, A., & Inzaghi, M. G. (1991). Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral neglect. Brain and Cognition, 15, 139–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bartolomeo, P., & Chockron, S. (2001). Levels of impairment in unilateral neglect. In M. Behrmann (Ed.), Disorders of visual behavior, handbook of neuropsychology 2nd ed. Vol. 4, pp. 67–98). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, J., & Pouget, A. (2000). Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 542–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnè, A., Buxbaum, L. J., Ferraro, M., Frassinetti, F., Whyte, J., Veramonti, T., … Ladavas, E. (2004). Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associate disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 75, 1401–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons-Natrella, M. (1966). Experimental statistics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1988). How long is a piece of string – a study of line bisection in a case of visual neglect. Cortex, 24, 321–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, P. W., & Marshall, J. C. (1998). Visuospatial neglect: The ultimate deconstruction? Brain and Cognition, 37, 419–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., Kraemer-McCaffery, T., Dow, L., Murphy, P. J. S., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2002). Categorisation of ‘Perceptual’ and ‘Premotor’ neglect patients across different tasks: Is there strong evidence for a dichotomy? Neuropsychologia, 40, 1387–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, M., & Olk, B. (2004). Comparison of the Milner and Bisiach Landmark tasks: Can neglect patients be classified consistenly? Cortex, 40, 659–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman, K. M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H. B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R. T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35, 855–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1995). Separate coding of space within and between objects: Evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 283–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiai, S., Koyama, Y., & Seki, K. (2001). Significance of paradoxical leftward error of line bisection in left unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 45, 238–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, S. E., & Heilman, K. M. (1991). Ipsilateral neglect in a patient following a unilateral frontal lesion. Neurology, 41, 2001–2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., & Halligan, P. W. (1996). Hemispheric antagonism in visuo-spatial neglect: A case study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2, 412–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milner, A. D., Harvey, M., Roberts, R. C., & Forster, S. V. (1993). Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia, 31, 39–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nico, D. (1996). Detecting directional hypokinesia: The epidiascope technique. Neuropsychologia, 34, 471–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Luckhurst, L., Burroughs, E., & Bateman, A. (1995). “Paradoxical neglect”: Spatial representations, hemisphere-specific activation, and spatial cueing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 569–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. H., Halligan, P. W., Bergego, C., Homberg, V., Piazzamiglio, L., Weber, E., & Wilson B. A. (1994). Right neglect following right hemisphere damage. Cortex, 30, 199–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuett, S., Dauner, R., & Zihl, J. (2011). Line bisection in unilateral homonymous visual field defects. Cortex, 47, 47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1997). Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 386(6621), 167–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, L. H., Batista, A. P., & Andersen, R. A. (1998). Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79, 2814–2819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A. (2003). A ruler for measuring representational space. Visual Cognition, 10, 567–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., Cattani, B., Zonca, G., Saletta, P., & Luzzatti, C. (2006). Reading disorders in a language with shallow orthography: A multiple single-case study in Italian. Aphasiology, 20, 823–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., Fiori, F., & Vanzan, S. (2010). The geometry of the landmark task. Behavioural Neurology, 23, 221–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toraldo, A., McIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (2002). Disentangling perceptual and response bias in unilateral neglect: A methodological proposal. Brain and Cognition, 48, 593–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., McIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (2004). A revised method for analyzing neglect using the landmark task. Cortex, 40, 415–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., McIntosh, R. D., Dijkerman, H. C., & Milner, A. D. (2010). Erratum to: A revised method for analyzing neglect using the landmark task [Cortex, 40: 415–431, 2004]. Cortex, 46, 144–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., & Reverberi, C. (2004). Misprojection of landmarks onto the spatial map. Brain and Cognition, 55, 479–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toraldo, A., Reverberi, C., & Rumiati, R. I. (2001). Critical dimensions affecting imitation performance of patients with ideomotor apraxia. Cortex, 37, 737–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallar, G., & Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: A body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192, 533–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R. T., Miller, B. D., & Heilman, K. M. (1978). Nonsensory neglect. Annals of Neurology, 3, 505–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werth, R. (1993). Shifts and omissions in spatial reference in unilateral neglect. In I. H. Robertson & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), Unilateral neglect: Clinical and experimental studies. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, D. T., & Halligan, P. W. (2002). The effects of stimulus symmetry on landmark judgments in left and right visual fields. Neuropsychologia, 40,1045–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, K. K. (1941). Determination of sample size for setting tolerance limits. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12, 91–96.
   Google Scholar