Publication Cover
Neurocase
Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume 22, 2016 - Issue 3
761
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gender differences in memory processing of female facial attractiveness: evidence from event-related potentials

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 317-323 | Received 19 Jun 2015, Accepted 04 Jan 2016, Published online: 29 Feb 2016

References

  • Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537–551.
  • Amihai, I., Deouell, L. Y., & Bentin, S. (2011). Neural adaptation is related to face repetition irrespective of identity: Are appraisal of the N170 effect. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 193–204.
  • Chen, A., Luo, Y., Wang, Q., Yuan, J., Yao, D., & Li, H. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of category induction: PSW amplitude as an index of identifying shared attributes. Biological Psychology, 76, 230–238.
  • Eimer, M. (2000). The face-specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces. Neuroreport, 11, 2319–2324.
  • Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2007). Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia, 4, 15–31.
  • Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154–158.
  • Guillem, F., Bicu, M., & Debruille, J. B. (2001). Dissociating memory processes involved in direct and indirect tests with ERPs to unfamiliar faces. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 113–125.
  • Guillem, F., & Mograss, M. (2005). Gender differences in memory processing: Evidence from event-related potentials to faces. Brain and Cognition, 57, 84–92.
  • Halit, H., de Haan, M., & Johnson, M. H. (2000). Modulation of event related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces. Neuroreport, 11, 1871–1875.
  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  • Heisz, J. J., Watter, S., & Shedden, J. M. (2006a). Automatic face identity encoding at the N170. Version Research, 46, 4604–4614.
  • Heisz, J. J., Watter, S., & Shedden, J. M. (2006b). Progressive N170 habituation to unattended repeated faces. Vision Research, 46, 47–56.
  • Henson, R. N., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ganel, T., Otten, L. J., Quayle, A., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 793–805.
  • Iaria, G., Fox, C.J., Waite, C.T., Aharon, I., & Barton, J.J.S. (2008). The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence. Neuroscience, 155, 409–422.
  • Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage, 15, 353–372.
  • Jacques, C., d’Arripe, O., & Rossion, B. (2007). The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–9.
  • Karniski, W., Clifford, B., & Snider, A. B. (1994). An exact statistical method for comparing topographic maps, with any number of subjects and electrodes. Brain Topography, 6, 203–210.
  • Kovacs, G., Zimmer, M., Harza, I., & Vidnyanszky, Z. (2007). Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects. Vision Research, 47, 3141–3149.
  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., & DeWall, C. N. (2007a). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.
  • Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Rouby, D. A., & Miller, S. L. (2007b). Can’t take my eyes off you: Attentional adhesion to mates and rivals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 389–401.
  • Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J., & Neuberg, S. L. (2003). Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1107–1120.
  • Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2010). When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 84, 192–205.
  • McGivern, R. F., Huston, J. P., Byrd, D., King, T., Siegle, G. J., & Reilly, J. (1997). Sex differences in visual recognition memory: Support for a sex-related difference in attention in adults and children. Brain and Cognition, 34, 323–336.
  • Meyers-Levy, J. (1989). Gender differences in information processing: A selectivity hypothesis. In P. C. Cafferata & A. M. Tybout (Eds), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising (pp. 219–260). Lexington: Lexington Books.
  • Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (1991). Exploring differences in males and females processing strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 63–70.
  • Oliver-Rodriguez, J. C., Guan, Z. Q., & Johnston, V. S. (1999). Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology, 36, 176–185.
  • Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz, C. (2005). Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion, 54, 498–502.
  • Schacht, A., Werheid, K., & Sommer, W. (2008). The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory. Cognitive, Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 132–142.
  • Schendan, H. E., Ganis, G., & Kutas, M. (1998). Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. Psychophysiology, 35, 240–251.
  • Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex, 39, 9–30.
  • Senior, C. (2003). Beauty in the brain of the beholder. Neuron, 38, 525–528.
  • Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Porterfield, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488–1497.
  • Van Hooff, J. C., Crawford, H., & van Vugt, M. (2011). The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 477–485.
  • Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190–203.
  • Wei, B., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Event-related potentials (ERPs) to gender differences in encoding processing for female facial attractiveness. 9th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2675–2678.
  • Werheid, K., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2007). Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 761, 100–108.
  • Wiese, H., Altmann, C. S., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 56, 26–36.
  • Zhang, Y., Kong, F., Chen, H., Jackson, T., Han, L., Meng, J. … Hasan, A. N. (2011). Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: An ERP experiment using a study-test paradigm. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 89, 1887–1893.
  • Zhang, Z., & Deng, Z. (2012). Gender, facial attractiveness, and early and late event-related potential components. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 11, 477–487.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.