Classification of multimodal translation errors in the entertainment industry: a proposal

References

• Albachten, Ö. B., and S. T. Gürçağlar. 2020. “Retranslation and Multimodality: Introduction”. The Translator 26 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/13556509.2020.1755944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arola, K. L., C. E. Ball, and J. Sheppard. 2014. Writer/designer: A Guide to Making Multimodal Projects. Boston, MA; New York: Bedford/St. Martins.
   Google Scholar
• Baldry, A., and P. Thibault. 2017. “Applications of Multimodal Concordances.” HERMES – Journal of Language and Communication in Business 21 (41): 11–41. doi:10.7146/hjlcb.v21i41.96812.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A., J. Wildfeuer, and T. Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis. A Problem-oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110479898.
   Google Scholar
• Boria, M., Á. Carreres, M. Noriega-Sánchez, and M. Tomalin. 2020. Translation and Multimodality, beyond Words. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429341557.
   Google Scholar
• Brumme, J., and A. Espunya. 2012. The Translation of Fictive Dialogue. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C., B. Cope, N. Fairclough, J. Gee, M. Kalantzis, G. Kress, A. Luke, C. Luke, S. Michaels, and M. Nakata. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicerto, S. 2018. Multimodal Pragmatics and Translation: A New Model for Source Text Analysis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, M. 2014. “Migrating Literacies: Multimodal Texts and Digitally Enabled Text Making.” Text & Talk 34 (3): 261–282. doi:10.1515/text-2014-0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Đorđević, J. 2011. Scientific, Professional and Official Translation, The Theory. Novi Sad: USEE.
   Google Scholar
• Đorđević, J. 2017. Neknjiževni tekst u savremenom prevodilaštvu [Non-Literary Text in Contemporary Translation]. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
   Google Scholar
• Đorđević, J., and Stamenković, D. 2021. ”The Influence of Monomodal and Multimodal Presentation on Translation Error Recognition: An Empirical Approach.” Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice 29 (6): 833–848. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2020.1825498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M. A. 1994. “Error Classification for MT Evaluation.” In Technology Partnerships for Crossing the Language Barrier, Proceedings of the First Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, Columbia, Maryland, 5–8 October 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 2006. “Non-verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitivist Framework: Agendas for Research.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, edited by G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, and F. J. R. de Mendoza Ibáñez, 379–402. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C. 2021. “Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by W. Xu and J. R. Taylor, 676–687. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781351034708.
   Google Scholar
• Gambier, Y. 2013. “The Position of Audiovisual Translation Studies.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by C. Millán and F. Bartrina, 45–59. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Hodder Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. 2008. “A Classification of Errors in Translation and Revision.” In CIUTI-Forum 2008. Enhancing Translation Quality: Ways, Means, Methods, edited by M. Forstner, H. Lee-Jahnke, and P. A. Schmitt, 313–326. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hiippala, T. 2020. “A Multimodal Perspective on Data Visualization.” In Data Visualization in Society, edited by M. Engebretsen and H. Kennedy, 277–293. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.1515/9789048543137-021.
   Google Scholar
• Ketola, A. 2015. “Towards A Multimodally Oriented Theory of Translation: A Cognitive Framework for the Translation of Illustrated Technical Texts.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 67–81. doi:10.1080/14781700.2015.1086670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketola, A. 2017. “Using Translation Research to Model Word Image Interaction.” New Voices in Translation Studies 17: 82–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Krings, H. P. 2001. Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kussmaul, P. 2000. “Types of Creative Translating.” In Translation in Context: Selected Papers from the EST Congress, Granada 1998, edited by A. Chesterman, N. Gallardo, and I. Gambier, 117–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, L. 2014. “Paternalismo Traductor En Las Traducciones Del Género Infantil Y Juvenil [Paternalistic Behaviour in Children’s Literature Translations].” Trans 18: 35–48. doi:10.24310/TRANS.2014.v0i18.3244.
   Google Scholar
• Martinec, R. 2004. “Gestures that Co-occur with Speech as a Systematic Resource: The Realization of Experiential Meanings in Indexes.” Social Semiotics 14 (2): 193–213. doi:10.1080/1035033042000238259.
   Google Scholar
• Mehdizadkhani, M., and M. Khoshsaligheh. 2021. “Insertion or Voice-off in Rendition of Graphic Codes: An Experiment in Persian Dubbing.” Visual Communication 20 (1): 81–99. doi:10.1177/1470357219838599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, L., and A. A. Hurtado. 2002. “Translation Techniques Revisited: A Dynamic and Functionalist Approach.” Meta: Journal Des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 47 (4): 498–512. doi:10.7202/008033ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord, C. 1997. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-oriented Text Analysis. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, E. 2003. “What Dubbers of Children’s Television Programmes Can Learn from Translators of Children’s Books?” Meta: Journal Des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 48 (1–2): 222–232. doi:10.7202/006969ar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, C. 2013. “Introduction: Multimodality as a Challenge and Resource for Translation.” The Journal of Specialised Translation 20: 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, L. 2014. Audiovisual Translation: Theories, Methods and Issues. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pflaeging, J., J. Wildfeuer, and J. A. Bateman, eds. 2021. Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110725001.
   Google Scholar
• Popović, M. 2018. “Error Classification and Analysis for Machine Translation Quality Assessment.” In Translation Quality Assessment. Machine Translation: Technologies and Applications, edited by J. Moorkens, S. Castilho, F. Gaspari, and S. Doherty, 129–158. Vol. 1. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91241-7_7.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto-Velasco, J. A., and A. Fuentes-Luque. 2016. “A Collaborative Multimodal Working Environment for the Development of Instrumental and Professional Competences of Student Translators: An Innovative Teaching Experience.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10 (1): 76–91. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2016.1154344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pym, A. 1992. “Translation Error Analysis and the Interface with Language Teaching.” In The Teaching of Translation, edited by C. Dollerup and A. Loddegaard, 279–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/z.56.42pym.
   Google Scholar
• Remael, A. 2004. “A Place for Film Dialogue Analysis in Subtitling Courses.” In Topics in Audiovisual Translation, edited by P. Orero, 103–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Specia, L., S. Frank, K. Sima’an, and D. Elliott. 2016. “A Shared Task on Multimodal Machine Translation and Crosslingual Image Description.” In Proceedings of the First Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2, edited by O. Bojar, C. Buck, R. Chatterjee, C. Federmann, L. Guillou, B. Haddow, M. Huck, A. Jimeno Yepes, and A. Névéol, 543–553. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2016. “The Multimodal Approach in Audiovisual Translation.” Target 28 (2): 222–236. doi:10.1075/target.28.2.04tay.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2009. “Pedagogical Tools for the Training of Subtitlers.” In Audiovisual Translation: Language Transfer on Screen, edited by J. Diaz-Cintas and G. Anderman, 214–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230234581_16.
   Google Scholar
• Tuominen, T., C. Jiménez Hurtado, and A. M. Ketola. 2017. “Why Methods Matter: Approaching Multimodality in Translation Research.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 17: 1–21. doi:10.52034/lanstts.v17i0.522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 1999. Speech, Music, Sound. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2012. “Critical Analysis of Multimodal Discourse.” The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0269.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. 2015. “Multimodality.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by H. E. Hamilton, D. Tannen, and D. Schiffrin, 447–465. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wildfeuer, J., J. Pflaeging, J. A. Bateman, O. Seizov, and C.-I. Tseng, eds. 2019. Multimodality: Disciplinary Thoughts and the Challenge of Diversity. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110608694.
   Google Scholar