“Can you work for us as an interpreter?” an ethnography of navigating tensions and emotions within an interpreting agency

References

• Angelelli, C. 2001. “Deconstructing the Invisible Interpreter: A Critical Study of the Interpersonal Role of the Interpreter in a Cross-Cultural/Linguistic Communicative Event.” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bendazzoli, C. 2016. “The Ethnography of Interpreter-Mediated Communication: Methodological Challenges in Fieldwork.” In Addressing Methodological Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research, edited by C. Bendazzoli and C. Monacelli, 2–30. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berk-Seligson, S. 1992. The Bilingual Courtroom Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. 2017. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, S. J. 2007. “‘Hidden ethnography’: Crossing Emotional Borders in Qualitative Accounts of Young People’s Lives.” Sociology 41 (4): 699–716. doi:10.1177/0038038507078925.
   Google Scholar
• Brannan, M. 2011. “Researching Emotions and the Emotions of Researching: The Strange Case of Alexithymia in Reflexive Research.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 4 (3/4): 322–339. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2011.045969.
   Google Scholar
• Brannan, M. 2014. “Research as an Emotional Journey.” In Researching with Feeling: The Emotional Aspects of Social and Organizational Research, edited by C. Clarke, M. Broussine, and L. Watts, 17–34. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brannick, T., and D. Coghlan. 2007. “In Defense of Being “Native”: The Case for Insider Academic Research.” Organizational Research Methods 10 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1177/1094428106289253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. D. 2000. Ethnography. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkitt, I. 2012. “Emotional Reflexivity: Feeling, Emotion and Imagination in Reflexive Dialogues.” Sociology 46 (3): 458–472. doi:10.1177/0038038511422587.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. M., N. J. Gray, Z. Meletis, J. G. Abbott, and J. J. Silver. 2006. “Gatekeepers and Keymasters: Dynamic Relationships of Access in Geographical Fieldwork.” Geographical Review 96 (1): 97–121. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2006.tb00389.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. 2011. “Gaining and Maintaining Access: Exploring the Mechanisms That Support and Challenge the Relationships Between Gatekeepers and Researchers.” Qualitative Social Work 10 (4): 485–502. doi:10.1177/1473325009358228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. 1999. The Ethnographic Self – Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. 1984. On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. 2010. “Interpreting in a Community of Practice a Sociolinguistic Study of the Signed Language Interpreter’s Role in Workplace Discourse.” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J. 2016. “(Re)constructing the Model of Interpreting Professionalism through Institutional Work: the Perceived Impact of Agencies on Interpreters’ Work Practices.” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Heriot-Watt University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, J., and G. Turner. 2016. “An Ergonomic Investigation of Work Processes Between Interpreters and Agencies.” Translation Spaces 5 (1): 97–123, Special Issue. doi:10.1075/ts.5.1.06don.
   Google Scholar
• Down, S., K. Garrety, and R. Badham. 2006. “Fear and Loathing in the Field: Emotional Dissonance and Identity Work in Ethnographic Research.” Management 9 (3): 87–107. doi:10.3917/mana.093.0095.
   Google Scholar
• Duflou, V. 2016. Be(com)ing a Conference Interpreter: An Ethnography of EU Interpreters as a Professional Community. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrensberger-Dow, M. 2014. “Challenges of Translation Process Research at the Workplace.” MonTi 7: 335–383. doi:10.6035/MonTI.2014.ne1.12.
   Google Scholar
• Fineman, S. 2005. “Appreciating Emotion at Work: Paradigm Tensions.” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 1 (1): 4–19. doi:10.1504/IJWOE.2005.007323.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2019. “Theorizing Affective Ethnography for Organization Studies.” Organization 26 (6): 741–760. doi:10.1177/1350508418805285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gile, D. 1995. “Interpretation Research: A New Impetus.” Hermes: Journal of Linguistics 8 (14): 15–19. doi:10.7146/hjlcb.v8i14.25100.
   Google Scholar
• González-Davies, M., and V. Enríquez Raído. 2016. “Situated Learning in Translator and Interpreter Training.” Special Issue of the Interpreter and Translator Trainer 10 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/1750399X.2016.1154339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, S., and J. Napier. 2013. Research Methods in Interpreting: A Practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury Academics.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd ed. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hokkanen, S. 2017. “Analyzing Personal Embodied Experiences: Autoethnography, Feelings, and Fieldwork.” Translation & Interpreting 9 (1): 24–35. doi:10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokkanen, S., and K. Koskinen. 2016. ““Affect as a Hinge: The Translator’s Experiencing Self as a Sociocognitive Interface.” Translation Spaces 5 (1): 78–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2014. Researching Organizations: The Pratices of Organizational Fieldwork. 1st ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, K. 2008. Translating Institutions: An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester, England: St.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. 1988. Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesianatoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, I. 2014. “Discourse and Ttranslation: A Social Perspective.” In Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by J. House, 36–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mellinger, C. 2020. “Positionality in Public Service Interpreting Research.” FITISPOS International Journal 7 (1): 92–109. doi:10.37536/FITISPos-IJ.2020.7.1.250.
   Google Scholar
• Milošević, J., and H. Risku. 2020. “Situated Cognition and the Ethnographic Study of Translation Processes: Translation Scholars as Outsiders, Consultants and Passionate Participants.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies 19: 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellana, M. F. 2010. “From Here to There: On the Process of Ethnography of Language Brokering.” Retrieved from ISSN 1974- 4382 http://mediazioni.sitlec.unibo.it
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., J. Dodge, E. G. Foldy, and A. Hofmann-Pinilla. 2008. “Taking the Action Turn: Lessons from Bringing Participation to Qualitative Research.” In Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason and R. Bradbury, 420–438. London, England: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ozolins, U. 2007. “The Interpreter’s ‘Third Client’ Interpreters, Professionalism and Interpreting Agencies.” In The Critical Link 4: Professionalisation of interpreting in the community. Selected papers from the 4th International Conference on Interpreting in Legal, Health and Social Service Settings, edited by C. Wadensjö, B. E. Dimitrova, and A.-L. Nilsson, 121–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, P. S., E. Oceguera, and J. Sanchez. 2011. Intersecting Differences: Organizing (Ourselves) for Social Justice Research with People in Vulnerable Communities. In Reframing Difference in Organizational Communication Studies: Research, Pedagogy and Practice, D. K. Mumby. editted by, 219–244. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
   Google Scholar
• Risku, H. 2017. “Ethnographies of Translation and Situated Cognition.” In The Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira, 290–310. Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119241485.ch16.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. 1993. Conversational Realities: Constructing Life Through Language. Beverley Hills: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sløk-Andersen, B., and A. Persson. 2020. “Awkward Ethnography: An Untapped Resource in Organizational Studies.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 10 (1): 65–78. doi:10.1108/JOE-09-2020-0036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, F. 2017. “Introspection, Positionality, and the Self as Research Instrument Toward a Model of Abductive Reflexivity.” In Approaches to Ethnography: Analysis and Representation in Participant Observations, edited by C. Jerolmack and S. Khan, 211–237. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiselius, E. 2019. “The (Un-) Ethical Interpreting Researcher: Ethics, Voice and Discretionary Power in Interpreting Research.” Perspectives 27 (5): 747–760. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2018.1544263.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. H., and F. J. Harrington. 2000. “Issues of Power and Method in Interpreting Research.” In Intercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies I: Textual and Cognitive Aspects, edited by M. Olohan, 253–265. Manchester: St.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 2010. “You Gotta Have a Grievance: Locating Heartbreak in Ethnography.” Journal of Management Inquiry 19 (4): 338–341. doi:10.1177/1056492610370284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteman, G., T. Müller, and J. Johnson. 2009. “Strong Emotions at Work.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 4 (1): 46–61. doi:10.1108/17465640910951444.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, S., and J. Napier. 2017. “Rebalancing Power: Participatory Research Methods.” International Journal of Translation & Interpreting Research 9 (1): 102–120. doi:10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a08.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2009. “Organizational Ethnography and Methodological Angst: Myths and Challenges in the Field.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 4 (2): 186–199. doi:10.1108/17465640910978427.
   Google Scholar