Benchmarking in Higher Education: An Australian Case Study

REFERENCES

• Alstete, J W (1995) Benchmarking in Higher Education: Adapting Best Practices to Improve Quality, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No 5, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, C and Baume, D (12-14 July, 1996a) A National Scheme to Accredit University Teachers, paper presented at the International Consortium of Educational Developers Conference, Preparing University Teachers, Vaasa, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Baume, C and Baume, D (1996b) ‘A national scheme to develop and accredit university teachers’, International Journal of Academic Development 1, 2, 51-8.
   Google Scholar
• Beaty, L (1996) Re? ections on the Benchmarking Project at QUT as a Partner in the Process, Unpublished, Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, M A (1995) ‘Benchmarks of successful faculty development: A call for discussion’, Journal of Staff, Program and Organisational Development, 13, 1, 31-3.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, P (1991) Self-direction for Life-long Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco.
   Google Scholar
• Coaldrake, P and Stedman, L (1998) On the Brink: Australia’s Universities Confronting their Future, University of Queensland Press, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, P (Jan, 1996) ‘Professional accreditation of university teaching’, Association of University Teachers Journal, 1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing Review Committee (1997) ‘The National committee of inquiry into higher education, Dearing Report’, Higher Education in the Learning Society, Report of the National Committee, HMSO, Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G (1995) ‘Promoting excellent teaching is harder than you think, A note from an outside observer of the roles and rewards initiative’, Change, May/June, 17-20.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G (22-25 July, 1996) Preparing University Teachers: An International Overview of Practices and Issues, Paper presented at the conference for Improving University Teaching, Nottingham Trent University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, O (1997) The Accreditation of University Teachers, A HERDSA discussion document, HERDSA, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, G (1996) Benchmarking: How to Carry out a Benchmarking Project - Workbook, Unpublished, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Lublin, J (May, 1997) The Accreditation of Teachers - Who Needs it? Paper presented at the workshop on the Accreditation of University Teachers, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Marchese, T (1995) ‘Understanding benchmarking’, AAHE Bulletin, 47, 8, 3-5.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, I (1993) Benchmarking in Education: Teacher Prep, A Case in Point, Columbia University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P S (1995) ‘Benchmarking academic research output in Australia’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20, 1, 45-57.
   Google Scholar
• Peischel, T (1995) Benchmarking: A Process for Improvement, International Conference on TQM and academic libraries, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Race, P (1997) ‘SEDA - promoting improved standards in teaching and teachers’, Physiological Society Newsletter, 28, 20-3.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M and Trahn, I (1997) ‘Benchmarking academic libraries: An Australian case study’, Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 28, 2, 126-41.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, V (12-14 July, 1996) Learning from Action and Action from Learning: Emerging Paradigms for Development in a Constantly Changing World, Paper presented at the International Consortium of Educational Developers Conference, Preparing University Teachers, Vaasa, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J P (1995) ‘Quality management benchmark assessment’, Quality Progress 57-61.
   Google Scholar
• SEDA (1996a) The Accreditation of Teachers in Higher Education,StaffandEducationalDevelopment Association, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• SEDA (1996b) ‘Submission to the National Committee of InquiryintoHigherEducation(TheDearing Committee)’, Staff and Educational Development Association, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Smeal, G (1996) Final Report: Benchmarking Project, ASDU, QUT, Unpublished report, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R (1997) ‘Making teaching count in Canadian higher education: Developing a national agenda’, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Spendolini, M J (1992) The Benchmarking Book, AMACOM, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stralser, S (1995) ‘Benchmarking: The new tool’, Planning for Higher Education, 23, 15-19.
   Google Scholar
• Terrell, J (1995) QUT Benchmarking Project Book, Unpublished, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, P and Crebert, G (1995) Report on the Graduate Certi? cate in Education (Higher Education) ED 68, Unpublished, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, P A and Smeal, G and Kelly, P and Hodgson, S and Gilbert, C (12-14 July, 1996) Preparing University Teachers in Australia: Benchmarking Best Practice, Paper presented to the international conference for the International Consortium of Educational Development, Vassa, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, P and Smeal, G and Kelly, P and Hodgson, S and Gilbert, C (1997) Preparing university teachers in Australia:Benchmarkingbestpractice,Das Hochschulwesen, 45, 2, 85-92.
   Google Scholar
• Zairi, M and Hutton, R (1995) ‘Benchmarking: A process tool for quality improvement’, The TQM Magazine, 7, 3, 35-40.
   Google Scholar