REFERENCES
- Dayton, D (1998) Technical editing on line: the quest for transparent technology, Journal of Technical Writing and communication, 28, 1, 3-38.
- Dillon, A (1992) Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 1297-1326.
- Dillon, A (1994) Designing Usable electronic Text, Taylor and Francis, London.
- Dommeyer, C J and Moriarty E (2000) Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: embedded versus attached. International Journal of Market research, 42, 1, 39-50.
- Haas, C (1996) Writing Technology: Studies on the Materiality of Literacy, Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.
- Hartley, J (1994) Designing Instructional Text, 3rd edn. Kogan Page, London.
- Hartley, J (1998) The role of printouts in editing text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 3, 277-82.
- Hartley, J and Ganier F (2000) Which do you prefer? Some observations on preference measures in studies of structured abstracts, European Science Editing, 26, 1, 4-7.
- Konner, M D (1982) The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the Human Spirit, Holt, New York.
- Rho, Y J and Gedeon, T D (2000) Academic articles on the Web: reading patterns and formats, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 12, 2, 219-40.
- Taylor, H (2000) Does Internet research work? Comparing online survey results with telephone survey. International Journal of Market Research. 42, 1, 51-63.
- Wilson, W and Moore, K (2000) Editing on screen, or paper, or both. European Science Editing, 26, 2, 50-2.