Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development

REFERENCES

• Berry, J and Nynian, M (1998) Introducing mathematical modelling skills to students and the use of posters in assessment, Primus, 8, 103-15.
   Google Scholar
• Billington, H L (1997) Poster presentations and peer assessment: novel forms of evaluation and assessment. Journal of Biological Education, 31, 218-20.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D (ed.) (1988) Developing Student Autonomy in Learning. 2nd edn. Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley. C (1993) Sex bias in student assessment overlooked? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18, 3-8.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S (ed.) (1998) Peer Assessment in Practice. SEDA Paper 102. SEDA, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S and Dove, P (1991) Self and Peer Assessment. SCED Paper 63. SCED (now SEDA). Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, I and Newstead. S E (1994) The strange case of the disappearing sex bias. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 19, 49-56.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N and Magin, D (1997) Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students' group process work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 22, 385-96.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N (1986) Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative group and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 11, 146-66.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N (1988) Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 25, 327-39.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment, Innovations in Education and Training International, 32, 175-87.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, M (1995) Peer assessment by groups of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 20, 289-300.
   Google Scholar
• Habeshaw, S. Gibbs, G and Habeshaw, T (1993) 53 Interexting Ways to Assess your Students, revised edn. Technical and Educational Services Ltd. Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, C (2000) Are assessors professional? Student assessment and the professionalism of academics, Active Learning in Higher Education, 1, 28-44.
   Google Scholar
• Magin, D (1993) Should student peer ratings be used as part of summative assessment? Research and Development in Higher Education, 16, 537-42.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F and Saljo. R (1976a) On qualitative differences in learning -- I: outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
   Google Scholar
• Marton. F and Saljo, R (1976b) On qualitative differences in learning - II: outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-27.
   Google Scholar
• Newstead, S E and Dennis. I (1990) Blind marking and sex bias in student assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 15, 132-9.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, K A. and Macalpine, JMK (1995) Peer and selfassessment at tertiary level -- an experiential report. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 20, 125-32.
   Google Scholar
• Orpen, C (1982) Student versus lecturer assessment of learning: a research note, Higher Education. 11, 567-72.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P. Merry, S and Reiling, K (1996) The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 21. 239-50.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, M (1996) Student attitudes to alternative forms of assessment and to openness. Open Learning, 11, 48-50.
   Google Scholar
• Sambell, K. McDowell, L and Brown, S (1997) "But is it fair?': an exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 349-71.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J and Yorke, M (ed.) (1998) Capability and Quality in Higher Education. 2nd edn. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Series. Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson. D. Case. S and van der Vleuten, C (1991) Strategies for student assess ment. In Boud, D and Feletti, G (eds) The Challenge of Problem Based Learning, Kogan Page, London.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-76.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, R (1999) The use of monitoring data on student progress and achievement as a means of identifying equal opportunities issues in course provision and developing appropriate remedial action. In Pearl, M and Singh, P (eds) Equal Opportunities in the Curriculum. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossum, E J and Taylor. I P (1987) The relationship between conception of learning and good teaching: A scheme for cognitive development. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. Bridges, P and Woolf, H (2000) Mark distributions and marking practices in UK higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education. 1, 7-27.
   Google Scholar