11
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

SOCIAL FACTORS IN PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION: A REVIEW

Pages 3-16 | Published online: 11 Dec 2006

References

  • Alter , M. , Eigen , L. and King , S. 1962 . “The effectiveness of confirmation plus trinket reinforcers in young children” , New York : Center for Programmed Instruction .
  • Austwick , K. , ed. 1964a . Teaching Machines and Programming , London : Pergamon .
  • Austwick , K. , ed. 1964b . Programming ‘64. , Bull. Res. Unit. Dept. Education, Univ. Sheffield .
  • Beane , D. G. 1962 . “ A comparison of linear and branching techniques of programmed instruction in plane geometry.” , Technical Report No. 1. Comparative studies in principles of programming mathematics in automated instruction Univ. Illinois .
  • Briggs , L. J. , Goldbeck , R. A. , Campbell , V. N. and Nichols , D. G. 1962 . “Experimental results regarding form of response, size of step, and individual differences in automated programmes.” Edited by: Coulson , J. E. 86 – 98 . (1962)
  • Bushnell , D. S. 1963 . “Technological change and the journeyman electrician: an experimental study in continuing education” , Menlo Park , California : Stanford Research Institute .
  • Butler , J. “Programming for schools.” . Paper presented to Assoc. P. Learning . September , London .
  • Carpenter , C. R. 1950 . “The classroom communicator.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 598 (1960)
  • Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. 1963 . “Comparative research on methods and media for presenting programmed courses in mathematics and English” , Pennsylvania State University .
  • Cassel , R. N. and Ullom , W. U. 1962 . “A preliminary evaluation of programmed instruction with high ability students” . Psychol. Rep. , 10 : 223 – 228 .
  • Cavanagh , P. 1963 . “The AutoTutor and classroom instruction. Three comparative studies” . Occup. Psychol. , 37 ( 1 ) : 44 – 84 .
  • Challinor , K. 1964 . “A comparison of multiple‐choice and constructed response programming of four spelling rules” . Programmed Learning , 1 ( 2 ) : 60 – 68 .
  • Child , D. 1964 . “The relationships between introversion‐extraversion, neuroticism and performance in school examinations” . Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. , 34 : 187 – 208 .
  • Coulson , J. E. , ed. 1962 . Programmed Learning and Computer‐based Instruction , New York : Wiley .
  • Cresswell , S. W. 1964 . “Chess: a study of the relationship between intelligence and performance in a programmed learning task” . Educ. Rev., Univ. Birmingham , 16 : 137 – 144 .
  • Crowder , N. A. and Zachert , V. 1961 . “Use of the AutoTutor at Keesler Air Force Base to train in fundamentals of electronics.” , Memorandum Report No. 1 Contract No. AF 33(616)‐6983 CPEE
  • Dececco , J. P. , ed. 1964 . Educational Technology , New York : Holt, Rhinehart and Winston .
  • Deese , J. 1961 . “Comment and summary: a mine of possible applications.” . Audio Visual Communication Rev. , 9 ( 5 ) Supp. 4
  • Della‐Piana , G. 1962 . “An experimental evaluation of programmed learning” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 495 – 501 .
  • Deterline , W. A. 1962 . An Introduction to Programmed Learning , Englewood Cliffs , N.J. : Prentice Hall .
  • Dick , W. 1963a . “Paired versus individual study of programmed instruction in contemporary algebra.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
  • Dick , W. 1963b . “Retention as a function of paired and individual use of programmed instruction“ . Journal of Programmed Instruction II , 3 : 17 – 23 .
  • Doty , B. A. and Doty , L. A. 1964 . “Programmed instructional effectiveness in relation to certain student characteristics” . J. Educ. Psychol. , 55 ( 6 ) : 334 – 338 .
  • Duncan , K. D. 1964 . “Experiments with inexpensive devices for programmed instruction in the multiple‐choice branching style” . Programmed Learning , 1 ( 3 ) : 145 – 154 .
  • Eigen , L. D. and Feldhusen , J. F. 1963 . “Interrelationships among attitude, achievement, reading and transfer variables in programmed instruction.” Edited by: Dececco , J. P. 376 – 386 . (1964),
  • Eigen , L. D. , Filep , R. T. , Goldstein , L. S. and Angalet , B. W. 1962 . “A comparison of three modes of presenting a programmed instruction sequence” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 453 – 460 .
  • Evans , J. L. , Glaser , R. and Homme , L. E. 1962 . “An investigation of teaching machine variables using learning programmes in symbolic logic” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 433 – 452 .
  • Eysenck , H. J. 1957 . The Dyamics of Anxiety and Hysteria , London : Routledge and Kegan Paul .
  • Feldhusen , J. F. 1961 . “Reactions of college students to self‐instructional teaching devices and programmed instruction” . A.I.D. 1 ,
  • Feldhusen , J. F. and Birt , A. 1962 . “A study of nine methods of presentation of programmed learning material” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 461 – 466 .
  • Flavell , J. H. 1963 . The Developmental Psychology of Jean Piaget , New York : Van Nostrand .
  • Follettie , J. F. 1961 . “Effect of training response mode, test form, and measure on acquisition of semi‐ordered factual materials” , Research Memorandum No. 24 Fort Benning, Georgia : U.S. Army Infantry Human Research Unit .
  • Frase , L. T. 1963 . “The effect of social reinforcers in programmed learning task” , Technical Report No. 11 Training Research Lab. Dept. Psychol., Univ. Illinois .
  • Fry , E. B. 1960 . “A study of teaching machine response modes.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 469 – 474 . (1960)
  • Fry , E. B. 1963 . Teaching Machines and Programmed Instruction , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
  • Frye , C. H. 1963 . “Group versus individual pacing in programmed instruction” , Oregon State System of Higher Education . Title VII, Project No. 847
  • Furneaux , W. D. 1962 . “The psychologist and (he university” . Universities Quarterly , 17 ( 1 ) : 33 – 47 .
  • Galanter , E. , ed. 1959 . Automatic Teaching: the state of the art , New York : Wiley .
  • Getzels , J. W. and Jackson , P. W. 1962 . Creativity and Intelligence , New York : Wiley .
  • Glaser , R. and Taber , J. I. 1961 . “Investi‐ gations of the characteristics of programmed learning sequences” , Pittsburgh , Pa : Programmed Learning Lab., Univ. Pittsburgh .
  • Goldstein , L. S. and Gotkin , L. G. 1962 . “A review of research: teaching machines versus programmed textbooks as presentation modes” , New York : Center for Programmed Instruction .
  • Gotkin , L. G. 1962 . “Programmed instruction in the schools: individual differences in programming styles” , New York : Center for Programmed Instruction .
  • Gotkin , L. G. 1964 . “Cognitive development and the issue of individual differences” . Programmed Instruction , IV : 1
  • Hartley , J. 1964 . “A Study in Programmed Learning.” , University of Sheffield . Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis,
  • Hartley , J. in press . “Linear and skip‐branching programmes: a comparative study.” . Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. ,
  • Heimer , R. T. 1963 . “Comparison of external pacing and self‐pacing of programmed instruction in mathematics using different methods of presentation.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
  • Herringshaw , P. E. and Hunter , J. H. 1964 . “Geography: branching versus linear programming” . In Educ. Rev. , Vol. 16 , 109 – 119 . Univ. Birmingham .
  • Hilgard , E. R. 1958 . Theories of Learning , London : Methuen .
  • Holland , J. G. 1959 . “Teaching psychology by a teaching machine programme.” Edited by: Deterline , W. (1962)
  • Hough , J. B. and Revsin , B. 1963 . “Pro‐ grammed instruction at the college level: a study of several factors influencing learning” . Phi Delta Kappan , 44 : 286 – 291 .
  • Howe , M. J. A. 1963 . “Some effects of knowledge of results in programmed learning.” , Univ. Sheffield . Unpublished Dissertation,
  • Hughes , J. L. 1962 . “The effectiveness of programmed instruction: experimental findings.” Edited by: Margulies , S. and Eigen , L. D. 44 – 49 . (1962)
  • Ingram , I. M. “Experiments in teaching and assessing undergraduates.” . Report on the Troon Conference on the Teaching of Psychiatry . pp. 15 – 26 . Dept. Psychological Medicine, Univ. Glasgow .
  • Jensen , A. R. 1960 . “Teaching machines and individual differences.” . Edited by: Smith , W. I. and Moore , W. 218 – 226 . (1962),
  • Jones , H. L. and Sawyer , M. O. 1949 . “A new evaluation instrument.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 644 (1960),
  • Kay , H. “Some research paradoxes of programmed instruction.” . Report of the Berlin International Conference on Programmed Instruction and Teaching Machines . pp. 440 – 446 .
  • Keislar , E. R. and McNeil , J. D. 1962 . “Teaching science and mathematics by autoinstruction in the primary grades: an experimental strategy in curriculum development.” Edited by: Coulson , J. E. 99 – 112 . (1962)
  • Kimble , G. A. and Wulff , J. J. 1961 . “The effectiveness of instruction in reading a scale as influenced by the relative amounts of demonstration and problem solving practice.”
  • Knight , M. and Tilley , K. 1962 . “Evaluation of the AutoTutor Mark II teaching machine” , Research Task No. 211, Report Tl/1455 Research Edited by: Cavanagh , P. Research Section, H.Q. Technical Training Command, R.A.F., Brampton . (1963)
  • Larkin , T. C. 1964 . “Electricity: a comparison between linear and branching methods of programming” . In Educ. Rev. , Vol. 16 , 92 – 98 . Univ. Birmingham .
  • Lottes , J. J. , Palmer , G. and Oakes , H. 1963 . “An experimental comparison of differential rates of pacing programmed mathematics.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
  • Lovell , K. 1961 . The Growth of Basic Mathematical and Scientific Concepts in Children , London : Univ. London Press .
  • Lumsdaine , A. A. 1959 . “Partial and more, complete automation of teaching in group and individual learning situations.” Edited by: Galanter , E. 147 – 166 . (1959),
  • Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. , eds. 1960 . Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: a source book , Washington , D.C. : N.E.A .
  • Lumsdaine , A. A. , Sulzer , R. L. and Kopstein , F. F. 1961 . “The effect of animation, cues and repetition of examples of learning from an instructive film.”
  • McDonald , F. J. 1961 . “Motivation and the communication process” . Audio Visual Communication Rev. , 9 ( 5 ) Supp. 4
  • McDonald , F. J. and Allen , D. W. 1962 . “An investigation of presentation, response and correction factors in programmed instruction” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 502 – 507 .
  • McKellar , P. 1957 . Imagination and Thinking , London : Cohen and West .
  • McNeil , J. D. 1964 . “Programmed instruction versus usual classroom procedures in teaching boys to read” . Amer. Ed. Res. J. , 1 ( 2 ) : 113 – 119 .
  • Mager , R. F. 1961 . “On the sequencing of instructional content” . Psychol. Rep. , 9 : 405 – 413 .
  • Mager , R. F. and Clark , C. 1963 . “Explorations in student controlled instruction” . Psychol. Rep. , 13 : 71 – 76 .
  • Margulies , S. and Eigen , L. D. , eds. 1962 . Applied Programmed Instruction , New York : Wiley .
  • Mayer , S. R. and Westfield , R. L. 1958 . “A field tryout of a teaching machine for the training of SAGE operations.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 658 (1960)
  • Moore , J. W. and Smith , W. I. 1962 . “A comparison of several types of reinforcement.” Edited by: Smith , W. I. and Moore , J. W. 192 – 201 . (1962),
  • Peel , E. A. 1960 . The Pupil's Thinking , London : Oldbourne .
  • Popham , W. J. 1962 . “The influence of novelty effect upon teaching machine learning” , San Francisco State College .
  • Porter , D. 1959 . “Some effects of year‐long teaching machine instruction.” Edited by: Galanter , E. 85 – 90 . (1959),
  • Pressey , S. L. 1926 . “A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 35 – 41 . (1960),
  • Ripple , R. E. “A comparison of the effectiveness of a programmed text with three other methods of presentation” . In Reported in Programmed Instruction , Vol. II , 5 6 Cornell Univ. . (1963)
  • Roe , A. 1956 . The Psychology of Occupations , New York : Wiley .
  • Roe , A. 1962 . “A comparison of branching methods for programmed learning” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 407 – 416 .
  • Rothkopf , E. Z. 1957 . “Heuristic discussion of psychological bases for the conduct of training by automatic devices: a functional diagram and an approach to research.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 305 – 310 . (1960),
  • Senter , R. J. , Neiberg , A. , Abama , J. S. and Morgan , R. L. 1964 . “An evaluation of branching and motivational phrases in a scrambled book” . Programmed Learning I , 3 : 124 – 133 .
  • Silverman , R. E. and Alter , M. 1961 . “Response mode, pacing and motivational effects in teaching machines” , New York : U.S. Naval Training Device Center . Tech. Report, NAVTRADEVCEN, 507‐3,
  • Silvern , L. (1963) . Filmstrip: “The Systems Engineering of Learning” , Educational Training Consultants . (available from Inadcon Ltd.)
  • Sime , M. E. 1964a . “The elements of a teaching system.” Edited by: Austwick , K. 113 – 135 . (1964a),
  • Sime , M. E. “Current research in programmed learning.” . Paper to Brit. Psychol. Soc. Annual Conference .
  • Skinner , B. F. 1954 . “The science of learning and the art of teaching.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 99 – 113 . (1960)
  • Skinner , B. F. 1958 . “Teaching machines.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 137 – 158 . (1960),
  • Skinner , B. F. and Holland , J. G. 1958 . “The use of teaching machines in college instruction.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 159 – 172 . (1960),
  • Smart , G. A. , Owen , S. G. , Hall , R. and Anderson , J. 1965 . “Research report” . New Education , 1 ( 3 ) : 29 – 31 .
  • Smith , N. H. 1962 . “The teaching of elementary statistics by the conventional classroom method versus the method of programmed instruction” . J. Educ. Res. , 55 : 417 – 420 .
  • Smith , W. I. and Moore , J. W. , eds. 1962 . Programmed Learning , New York : Van Nostrand .
  • Stolurow , L. M. 1961 . Teaching by Machine , Washington , D.C. : Dept. Health, Education and Welfare .
  • Stolurow , L. M. and Breham , M. 1963 . “A study of transfer effects of verbal learning” , Quarterly Rep. No. 5 Psychological and Educational Factors in Transfer of Training, Training Res. Lab., Univ. Illinois .
  • Wallis , D. 1964 . “Experiments on the use of programmed instruction to increase the productivity of training” . Occup. Psychol. , 38 : 141 – 160 .
  • Wallis , D. and Wicks , R. P. 1962 . “A comparative study of teaching machines and classroom instruction in a naval training establishment” , S.P. Rep. 2/62 Edited by: Cavanagh , P. Admiralty : Senior Psychologists’ Division, Manpower Dept. . (1963)
  • Weimer , P. K. 1958 . “A proposed automatic teaching device.” Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. 311 – 317 . (1960),
  • Schramm , W. 1964 . The Research on Programmed Instruction: an annotated bibliography , Washington : U.S. Dept. Health, Education and Welfare . This paper is abstracted in

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.