MODE OF RESPONDING AND REDUNDANCY

References

• Larkin , T. C. and Leith , G. O. M. 1964 . The effects of branching and linear methods of programming on learning and retention of a topic in elementary science . Prog. Learning , 1 : 12 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Leith , G. O. M. and Buckle , C. F. 1965 . “ Mode of response and non‐specific background knowledge ” . In Interim Technical Report , Nat. Centre for Prog. Learning .
   Google Scholar
• Leith , G. O. M. and Ghuman , A. S. 1966 . “ The effects of prompting and confirmation on two methods of responding to a self‐instructional programme on coordinate geometry ” . In Res. Notes on Prog. Learning , Nat. Centre for Prog. Learning . No. 6,
   Google Scholar
• Leith , G. O. M. and Hope , B. 1965 . A comparison of two modes of responding to linear and branching programmes . Educ. Rev. , 17 : 223 – 233 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton , R. 1964 . The relationship of step‐size to ability and their effects on learning . Educ. Rev. , 16 : 99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan , R. M. and Du Bois , B. L. 1965 . How many frames to teach? . Prog. Learning , 2 : 46 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , W. and Moore , J. W. 1962 . Size of step and achievement in programmed spelling . Psychol. Rep. , 10 : 287 – 294 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar