PROGRAMMED LEARNING IN PAIRS: THE RESULTS OF MINIATURE EXPERIMENTS

References

• Amaria , R. , Biran , L. A. and Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . “Learning in Pairs.” . In Research Note on Programmed Learning , National Centre for Programmed Learning, University of Birmingham . No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Argyle , M. 1967 . The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour , Harmondsworth : Penguin .
   Google Scholar
• Austwick , K. 1965 . “ Research report.” . New Education , 1 ( 10 ) : 25 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Crist , R.L. 1966 . “ Group use of programmed instruction with four academically able students.” . N.S.P.I. Journal , V ( 9 ) : 9 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Dick , W. 1963 . “Retention as a function of paired and individual use of programed instruction.” . J. Programed Instruction , II ( 3 ) : 17 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Dick , W. and Seguin , E. L. 1963 . “ Effects of personality pairing on the performance of students in a programed course in English grammar.” , Comparative Research on Methods and Media for Presenting Programed Course in Mathematics and English Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. Pennsylvania : Pennsylvania State University . (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Farber , I. J. 1965 . “The Study of programmed instruction in a group situation.” . Dissertation Abstracts , XXVI ( 3 ) : 1509 – 1510 .
   Google Scholar
• Frye , C. H. 1963 . “Group versus individual pacing in programmed instruction.” , Report of Oregon State System of Higher Education Title VII, Project No. 847
   Google Scholar
• Hartley , J. “ Some factors affecting student performance in programmed learning.” . Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Problems of Programmed Learning and Teaching Machines . Prague . (In press.) (Copies available on request.)
   Google Scholar
• Jones , C. W. 1964 . A programmed management course‐‐individual versus group administration , London : Dept. Occupational Psychology, Birkbeck College .
   Google Scholar
• Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . “Research on programmed learning.” . Visual Education , November : 22 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield , W. J. 1964 . “Individual versus group methods in programmed instruction.” . In Research Notes on Programmed Learning , National Centre for Programmed Learning, University of Birmingham . No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Robson , A. 1967 . “ Group integration without group interference: a method of presenting programmed instruction.” . In Aspects of Educational Technology , Edited by: Unwin , D. and Leedham , J. London : Methuen . (1967)
   Google Scholar
• Sawiris , M. Y. 1966a . “An experimental study of individual and group learning using a linear geometry program.” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 3 ( 3 ) : 146 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawiris , M. Y. 1966b . “ A study of interaction in small instructional groups.” . Educational Review , 19 ( 1 ) : 51 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Siegel , S. 1956 . Non‐Parametric Statistics , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Stott , D. 1966 . “Chemistry by group learning.” . Times Educational Supplement , July 8 and July 22
   Google Scholar
• Winer , B. J. 1962 . Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc , B. 1966 . Social Psychology: An Experimental Approach , Belmont : Wadsworth .
   Google Scholar