SOME FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENT PERFORMANCE IN PROGRAMMED LEARNING

References

• Allan , J. and Richardson , R. H. “Programmed learning: a multi‐media approach,” . The Proceedings of the APL‐NCPL Programmed Learning Conference, April 1967. (In press.)
   Google Scholar
• Amaria , R. P. “Learning in Pairs.” . Proceedings of the APL‐NCPL Programmed Learning Conference . April 1967 . (In press.)
   Google Scholar
• Amaria , R. P. , Biran , L. A. and Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . “Learning in Pairs.” . In Research Notes on Programmed Learning, , National Centre for Programmed Learning, University of Birmingham . No. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Argyle , M. 1967 . The Psychology of Interpersonal Behaviour , Harmondsworth : Penguin .
   Google Scholar
• Austwick , K. 1965 . “Research report,” . New Education , 1 ( 10 ) : 25 – 26 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. I. 1965 . “Where programmed instruction fits‐‐a study of attitudes to group pacing,” . NS.P.I. Journal , IV ( 8 ) : 15
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. , eds. 1963 . Comparative Research on Methods and Media for Presenting Programmed Courses in Mathematics and English , Pennsylvania : Pennsylvania State University .
   Google Scholar
• Crist , R. L. 1966 . “Group use of programmed instruction with four academically able students,” . NS.P.I. Journal , V ( 9 ) : 9 – 15 .
   Google Scholar
• Dick , W. 1963 . ldquo;Retention as a function of paired and individual use of programmed instruction,” . J. Programmed Instruction , II ( 3 ) : 17 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Dick , W. and Seguin , E. L. 1963 . “Effects of personality pairing on the performance of students in a programmed course in English grammar.” . Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Dodd , B. T. 1965 . “Programmed learning against the clock,” . New Education , 1 ( 7 ) : 37 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Farber , I. J. 1965 . “The study of the use of programmed instruction in a group, situation,” . Dissertation Abstracts , XXVI ( 3 ) : 1509 – 1510 .
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen , J. F. and Birt , A. 1962 . “A study of nine methods of presentation of programmed learning material,” . J. Ed. Res. , 55 ( 9 ) : 461 – 466 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellows , B. J. and Apter , M. J. 1967 . “An experimental study of three variables in the presentation of audio‐visual teaching programs,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 4 ( 1 ) : 19 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry , E. B. 1960 . “A study of teaching machine response modes.” . In Teaching Machines and Programmed Instruction , Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. Washington : N.E.A .
   Google Scholar
• Frye , C. H. 1963 . Group versus individual pacing in programmed instruction Report of Oregon State System of Higher Education. Title VII, Project No. 847
   Google Scholar
• Gallegos , A. M. 1966 . “A study and comparison of experimenter pacing and student pacing of programmed instruction,” . Dissertation Abstracts , 27 ( 3 ) : 702A
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill , L. P. , Lottes , J. J. and Pagano , A. 1963 . “Adaptation and evaluation of a programmed mathematics course for televised presentation.” . Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Gropper , G. L. and Kress , G. C. 1965 . “Individualising instruction through pacing procedures,” . Audio‐Visual Communication Review , 13 ( 2 ) : 165 – 182 .
   Google Scholar
• Hartley , J. 1966 . “Social factors in programmed instruction: a review,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 3 ( 1 ) : 3 – 16 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley , J. and Cook , A. “Programmed learning in pairs: the results of miniature experiments,” . Proceedings of the APL‐NCPL Programmed Learning Conference . April 1967 . (In press.)
   Google Scholar
• Heimer , R. T. 1963 . “Comparison of external pacing and self‐pacing of programmed instruction in mathematics using different methods of presentation.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Holling , K. 1967 . “The feedback classroom in use.” Edited by: Unwin , D. and Leedham , J. (1967)
   Google Scholar
• Jones , C. W. 1964 . “A programmed management course‐‐individual versus group administration,” , London : Dept. Occup. Psychol., Birkbeck College .
   Google Scholar
• Keislar , E. R. and McNeil , J. D. 1962 . “Teaching science and mathematics by auto‐instruction in the primary grades.” . In Programmed Learning and Computer‐Based Instruction , Edited by: Coulson , J. E. New York : Wiley . (1962)
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs , M. and Terenyi , L. 1967 . “Didako‐mat: a feedback device for controlling classroom activities of groups.” Edited by: Unwin , D. and Leedham , J. (1967)
   Google Scholar
• Leedham , J. “Learning programmes presented by a fully automated response system to small groups,” . Proceedings of the APL‐NCPL Programmed Learning Conference . April 1967 . (In press.)
   Google Scholar
• Leedham , J. and Unwin , D. 1965 . Programmed Learning in the Schools , London : Longmans .
   Google Scholar
• Leith , G. O. M. 1966 . “Research on programmed learning,” . Visual Education , November : 22 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Lewis , B. N. 1963 . “The rationale of adaptive teaching machines,” and "Automated group instruction.” . In Mechanisation in the Classroom , Edited by: Goldsmith , M. London : Souvenir Press . (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Lewis , J. T. 1965 . “A study of pacing rate and mode of presentation in programmed instruction,” . Dissertation Abstracts , XXV ( 1 ) : 649
   Google Scholar
• Lottes , J. J. , Palmer , G. and Oakes , H. 1963 . “An experimental comparison of differential rates of pacing programmed mathematics.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Moore , D. L. 1967 . “Group teaching by programmed instruction,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 4 ( 1 ) : 37 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield , W. J. 1964 . “Individual versus group methods in programmed instruction,” . In Research Notes on Programmed Learning, No. 1 , National Centre for Programmed Learning, University of Birmingham .
   Google Scholar
• Pask , G. 1960 . “Adaptive teaching with adaptive machines.” . In Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning , Edited by: Lumsdaine , A. A. and Glaser , R. Washington : N.E.A . 1960
   Google Scholar
• Robson , A. 1967 . “Group integration without group interference: a method of presenting programmed instruction.” Edited by: Unwin , D. and Leedham , J. (1967)
   Google Scholar
• Sawiris , M. Y. 1966a . “An experimental study of individual and group learning using a linear geometry program,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 3 ( 3 ) : 146 – 153 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawiris , M. Y. 1966b . “A study of interaction in small instructional groups,” . Educational Review , 19 ( 1 ) : 51 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Sawiris , M. Y. 1966c . “Group learning using a projected programme,” . Visual Education , August : 29 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Silverman , R. E. and Alter , M. 1961 . “Response mode, pacing and motivational effects in teaching machines.” , New York : U.S. Naval Training Device Centre . Technical Report. NAVTRADEVCEN, 507‐3
   Google Scholar
• Spencer , R. E. 1963 . “Comparisons of televised with teaching machine and televised with instructor presentations of English grammar.” Edited by: Carpenter , C. R. and Greenhill , L. P. (1963)
   Google Scholar
• Stolurow , L. M. 1965 . “A model and cybernetic system for research on the teaching learning process,” . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 2 ( 3 ) : 138 – 157 .
   Google Scholar
• Stott , D. 1966 . “Chemistry by group learning,” . Times Educational Supplement , July 8 and July 22
   Google Scholar
• Unwin , D. and Leedham , J. , eds. 1967 . Aspects of Educational Technology , London : Methuen .
   Google Scholar
• Wakelam , B. B. and Roberts , J. D. 1966 . Fractions , London : Methuen .
   Google Scholar
• Zajonc , B. 1966 . Social Psychology: An Experimental Approach , Belmont : Wads‐worth .
   Google Scholar