Collaborating across the threshold: The development of interprofessional expertise in child safeguarding

References

• Anning, A., Cottrell, D., Frost, N., Green, J., & Robinson, M. (2006). Developing multiprofessional teamwork for integrated children’s services. Maidenhead, UK: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., Jones, M., & Lamont, E. (2007). Multi-agency working and its implications for practice: A review of the literature. Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Ayre, P. (2001). Child protection and the media: Lessons from the last three decades. British Journal of Social Work, 31(6), 887–901. doi:10.1093/bjsw/31.6.887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre, P., & Calder, M. C. (2010). The de-professionalisation of child protection: Regaining our bearings. In P. Ayre, & M. Preston-Shoot (Eds.), Children’s services at the crossroads: A critical evaluation of contemporary policy for practice. Lyme Regis, UK: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, J. H., Paul, R., & Seeman, E. (2006). Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge. Information & Management, 43(1), 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, M., Belderson, P., Warren, C., Gardner, R., Howe, D., Dodsworth, J., & Black, J. (2008). The preoccupation with thresholds in cases of child death or serious injury through abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Review, 17(5), 313–330. doi:10.1002/car.v17:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, L., Lazenbatt, A., & Wallace, I. (2010). Information sharing and reporting systems in the UK and Ireland: Professional barriers to reporting child maltreatment concerns. Child Abuse Review, 19(3), 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., Eekelaar, J., & Murray, T. (1983). The protection of children. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2005). Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho‐social dynamics of child protection: Reflections on the Victoria Climbie case. Social Work Education, 24(7), 781–795. doi:10.1080/02615470500238702
   Google Scholar
• Fook, J., Ryan, M., & Hawkins, L. (2000). Professional expertise: Practice, theory and education for working in uncertainty. London, UK: Whiting & Birch Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, M. (1999). Health visitors’ perceptions of domestic violence: The private nature of the problem. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(3), 589–596. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01128.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, J. D., & Grimbeek, P. (2011). Sources of knowledge of departmental policy on child sexual abuse and mandatory reporting identified by primary school student‐teachers. Educational Review, 63(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, J., & Grimbeek, P. (2014). Bridging the gaps in child sexual abuse reporting and disclosure: Child sexual abuse and mandatory reporting intervention preservice content preferred by student teachers. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 23, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10538712.2014.859200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagens, V., Dobrow, M., & Chafe, R. (2009). Interviewee transcript review: Assessing the impact on qualitative research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 47–56. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardiker, P., Exton, K., & Barker, M. (1991). Policies and practices in preventive child care. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., & McCallum, C. (2001). Mandatory notification training for suspected child abuse and neglect in South Australian schools. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(12), 1603–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2012). A critical realist model of complexity for interprofessional working. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26, 6–12. doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.598640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2014). Complexity and integrated working in children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 44(1), 27–43. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2015a). A socio-technical critique of tiered services: Implications for interprofessional care. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29, 8–12. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.937482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2015b). How professionals experience complexity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Child Abuse Review, 24(2), 140–152. doi:10.1002/car.v24.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2015c). How professionals experience complexity: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Child Abuse Review, 24(2), 140–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R. (2016). How professionals talk about complex cases: A critical discourse analysis. Child & Family Social Work, 21(2), 125–135. doi:10.1111/cfs.v21.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, R., Gillespie, J., & Davies, J. (2016). A conceptual review of interprofessional expertise in child safeguarding. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30, 493–498. doi:10.3109/13561820.2016.1173656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. N. (2006). BC children and youth review: An independent review of British Colombia’s child protection system. Victoria, Canada: Ministry of Children and Family Development.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., Clare, J., & Mannix, J. (2002). Who would want to be a nurse? Violence in the workplace – a factor in recruitment and retention. Journal of Nursing Management, 10(1), 13–20. doi:10.1046/j.0966-0429.2001.00262.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laming, L. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. London, UK: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. London, UK: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonne, B., & Parton, N. (2014). Portrayals of child abuse scandals in the media in Australia and England: Impacts on practice, policy, and systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 38(5), 822–836. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCusker, P., & Jackson, J. (2016). Social work and mental distress: Articulating the connection. British Journal of Social Work, 46(6), 1654–1670 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzies Lyth, I. (1988). Containing anxiety in institutions (Vol. 1). London: Free Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2009). Managing societal and institutional risk in child protection. Risk Analysis, 29(7), 1015–1023. doi:10.1111/risk.2009.29.issue-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). The Munro review of child protection part one: A systems analysis. London, UK: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ovretveit, J. (1993). Coordinating community care: Multidisciplinary teams and care management. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, D. (2006). Threshold decisions: How social workers prioritize referrals of child concern. Child Abuse Review, 15(1), 4–18. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0852
   Google Scholar
• Polnay, J. C. (2000). General practitioners and child protection case conference participation: Reasons for non-attendance and proposals for a way forward. Child Abuse Review, 9(2), 108–123. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0852
   Google Scholar
• Raman, S., Holdgate, A., & Torrens, R. (2012). Are our frontline clinicians equipped with the ability and confidence to address child abuse and neglect? Child Abuse Review, 21(2), 114–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, A., Paliokosta, P., Maisey, D., Johnson, J., Capstick, J., & Jones, R. (2014). Barriers to Learning from Serious Case Reviews. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/barriers-to-learning-serious-case-reviews
   Google Scholar
• Reder, P., & Duncan, S. (2003). Understanding communication in child protection networks. Child Abuse Review, 12(2), 82–100. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0852
   Google Scholar
• Rowse, V. (2009). Children’s nurses’ experiences of child protection: What helps? Child Abuse Review, 18(3), 168–180. doi:10.1002/car.v18:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (Eds.). (2010). Relationship-based social work: Getting to the heart of practice. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, J., & Crosbie, T. (2013). Democracy and scandal: A research agenda. Comparative Sociology, 12(6), 851–862. doi:10.1163/15691330-12341285
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, D., Brière, N., Robitaille, H., Fraser, K., Desroches, S., & Légaré, F. (2014). A systematic process for creating and appraising clinical vignettes to illustrate interprofessional shared decision making. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 28, 453–459. doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.911157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. (2000). The emergence of knowledge in organization. Emergence, 2(4), 23–39. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0204_05
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, J., Whittle, M., Wilson, J., & Hall, L. (2013). Safeguarding and child protection education for UK trainee teachers in higher education. Child Abuse Review, 22, 108–115. doi:10.1002/car.2275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. (2002). Accomplishing ‘the case’ in paediatrics and child health: Medicine and morality in interprofessional talk. Sociology of Health & Illness, 24(4), 409–435. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Hall, C., & Peckover, S. (2009). The descriptive tyranny of the common assessment framework: Technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7), 1197–1217. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willumsen, E. (2008). Interprofessional collaboration - a matter of differentiation and integration: Theoretical reflections based in the context of Norwegian childcare. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22, 352–363. doi:10.1080/13561820802136866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar