Challenges in delivering personalised support to people with multiple and complex needs: qualitative study

References

• Alakeson, V., & Perkins, R. (2012). Recovery, personalisation and personal budgets. London, UK: Centre for Mental Health, Mental Health Network NHS Confederation.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., & Baxter, K. (2012). Exploring the temporal aspects of direct payments. The British Journal of Social Work, 42, 147–164. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2011). Abandoning care? A critical perspective on personalisation from an ethic of care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 153–167. doi:10.1080/17496535.2010.484265
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2012). Are personal budgets necessarily empowering for service users? If not, what’s it all about? Research, Policy and Planning, 29, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, G., & Fitzpatrcik, S. (2015). Hard edges: Mapping severe and multiple disadvantage. London, UK: Lankelly Chase Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S. (2008). Personalisation: A rough guide. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Clewett, N., Hamilton, S., Szymczynska, P., Manthorpe, J., Tew, J., Larsen, J., & Pinfold, V. (2015). How can the benefits of personal budgets for people with mental illness be sustained after the payments stop? Research, Policy and Planning, 31, 105–126.
   Google Scholar
• Cornes, M., Joly, L., Manthorpe, J., O’Halloran, S., & Smyth, R. (2011). Working together to address multiple exclusion homelessness. Social Policy and Society, 10, 513–522. doi:10.1017/S1474746411000261
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, A., Entwistle, V. A., Eccles, A., Ryan, S., Shepperd, S., & Perera, R. (2015). Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD010523.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(sup1), 116–131. doi:10.1080/13561820500082529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. (2015). Addressing complex needs: Improving services for vulnerable homeless people. London, UK: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2007). Putting people first: A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social care. London, UK: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, M., with, & Corner, J. (2012). Severe and multiple disadvantage. A review of key texts. London, UK: Lankelly Chase Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. (2007). Increasing user choice or privatizing risk? The antinomies of personalization. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 387–403. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., & Littlechild, R. (2009). Direct payments and personal budgets. Putting personalisation into practice (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernandez, J. L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., … Wilberforce, M. (2008). Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme. York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, M., Beresford, P., with, Bewley, C., Branfield, F., Butt, J., Croft, S., … Turner, M. (2008). Person-centred support. What service users and practitioners say. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. N., & Johnson, C. D. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in research, education, and clinical practice: Working together for a better future. The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 29, 1–10. doi:10.7899/JCE-14-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, S., Manthorpe, J., Szymczynska, P., Clewett, N., Larsen, J., Pinfold, V., & Tew, J. (2015). Implementing personalisation in integrated mental health teams in England. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29, 488–493. doi:10.3109/13561820.2015.1035777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heslop, P., & Williams, V. J. (2009). Personalisation in mental health: Breaking down the barriers. A guide for care coordinators. London, UK: MIND.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, J. (2001). Clients with complex needs. Interprofessional practice. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., Tew, J., Hamilton, S., Manthorpe, J., Pinfold, V., Szymczynska, P., & Clewett, N. (2015). Outcomes from personal budgets in mental health: Service users’ experiences in three English local authorities. Journal of Mental Health, 24, 219–224. doi:10.3109/09638237.2015.1036971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlechild, B., & Smith, R. (2013). A handbook for interprofessional practice in the human services: Learing to work together. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (2010). The individual in social care: The ethics of care and the ‘personalisation agenda’ in services for older people in England. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4, 188–200. doi:10.1080/17496535.2010.484262
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M. (2012). Social work and personalisation. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 783–792. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lymbery, M., & Postle, K. (2010). Social work in the context of adult social care in England and the resultant implications for social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2502–2522. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, L., Britten, N., Lydahl, D., Naldemird, Ö., Elam, M., & Wolf, W. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31, 662–673. doi:10.1111/scs.12376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J. (2016). Iterative categorisation (IC): A systematic technique for analysing qualitative data. Addiction, 111, 1096–1106. doi:10.1111/add.13314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Tompkins, C., & Strang, J. (2016). Qualitative evaluation of a novel contingency management-related intervention for patients receiving supervised injectable opioid treatment. Addiction, 111, 665–674. doi:10.1111/add.13212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, J., Vitoratou, S., Finch, E., Lennon, P., Mitcheson, L., Panebianco, D., … Marsden, J. (2016). Development and validation of ‘SURE’: A patient reported outcome measure (PROM) for recovery from drug and alcohol dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 165, 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C. (2011). Personalization: From story-line to practice. Social Policy & Administration, 45, 54–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Glasby, J. (2014a). Introduction: Debating personalization. In C. Needham & J. Glasby (Eds.), Debates in personalization (pp. 3–10). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Glasby, J. (2014b). Taking stock of personalization. In C. Needham & J. Glasby (Eds.), Debates in personalization (pp. 11–24). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Netten, A., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Fernandez, J. L., Challis, D., Glendinning, C., … Wilberforce, M. (2012). Personalisation through individual budgets: Does it work and for whom? The British Journal of Social Work, 42, 1556–1573. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt Williams, E., & Morrow, S. L. (2009). Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: A pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 576–582. doi:10.1080/10503300802702113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, J., & Regan, S. (2004). Meeting complex needs: The future of social care. London, UK: Turning Point/Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR).
   Google Scholar
• Rosengard, A., Laing, I., Ridley, J., & Hunter, S. (2007). Closing the opportunity gap – Findings of a literature review on multiple and complex needs. Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Executive Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Slasberg, C., Beresford, P., & Schofield, P. (2012). Can personal budgets really deliver better outcome for all at no cost? Reviewing the evidence, costs and quality. Disability & Society, 27, 1029–1034. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.736671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, H. (2011). ‘Truth’ junkies: Using evaluation in UK public policy. Policy & Politics, 39, 499–512. doi:10.1332/030557311X574216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter, E., Arndt, J., Arthur, N., Parboosingh, J., Taylor, E., & Deutschlander, S. (2009). Role understanding and effective communication as core competencies for collaborative practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 23, 41–51. doi:10.1080/13561820802338579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, A. (2012). Evidence review: Personalisation. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Age NI.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional educaton and collaborative practice. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar