Interprofessional teamwork in primary care: the effect of functional heterogeneity on performance and the role of leadership

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos 24 user’s guide. Armonk, NY: Amos Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Benoliel, P., & Somech, A. (2015). The role of leader boundary activities in enhancing interdisciplinary team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 46, 83–124. doi:10.1177/1046496414560028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, S., & Williams, S. (2018). Professional identity in interprofessional teams: Findings from a scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33, 170–181. doi:10.1080/13561820.2018.1536040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierema, L. L. (2018). Adult learning in health professions education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 157, 27–40. doi:10.1002/ace.20266
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D., & Halverson, R. R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157–172. doi:10.1177/014920639802400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. L., Flavell, H. L., Trede, F., & Smith, M. (2016). A scoping review to understand “leadership” in interprofessional education and practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 30, 408–415. doi:10.3109/13561820.2016.1150260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Lewis, L., Ellis, K., Stewart, M., Freeman, T. R., & Kasperski, M. J. (2011). Conflict on interprofessional primary health care teams – Can it be resolved? Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 4–10. doi:10.3109/13561820.2010.497750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429–452. doi:10.1111/peps.1996.49.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Konrad, S., Fletcher, S., Hood, R., & Patel, K. (2019). Theories of power in interprofessional research–developing the field. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33, 401–405. doi:10.1080/13561820.2019.1669544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices for exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations to get the most out of your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amour, D., Ferrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beaulieu, M.-D. (2005). The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19, S116–S131. doi:10.1080/13561820500082529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkhoff, T. (2014). The dutch social support act in the shadow of the decentralization dream. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 36(3), 276–294.
   Google Scholar
• Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., … Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiscella, K., & Mcdaniel, S. H. (2018). The complexity, diversity, and science of primary care teams. American Psychological Association, 73, 451–467. doi:10.1037/amp0000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. F., Advocat, J., Crabtree, B. F., Levesque, J.-F., Miller, W. L., Gunn, J. M., … Russell, M. (2016). Interprofessional teamwork innovations for primary health care practices and practitioners: Evidence from a comparison of reform in three countries. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 35–46. doi:10.2147/JMDH
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofhuis, J., Mensen, M., Ten Den, L. M., Van Den Berg, A. M., Koopman-Draijer, M., Van Tilburg, M. C., … De Vries, S. (2018). Does functional diversity increase effectiveness of community care teams? The moderating role of shared vision, interaction frequency, and team reflexivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48, 535–548. doi:10.1111/jasp.2018.48.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, A. C., & Greer, L. L. (2013). Considering diversity: The positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 105–125. doi:10.1177/1368430212437798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., Nguyen, H., Groth, M., & White, L. (2018). Reaping the rewards of functional diversity in healthcare teams: Why team processes improve performance. Group & Organization Management, 43, 440–474. doi:10.1177/1059601118769192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Personnel Psychology, 50, 121–146. doi:10.1111/peps.1997.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management, 42(1), 58–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J. R., Christensen, C., Franz, T. M., & Abbott, A. S. (1998). Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 93–108. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852. doi:10.1177/1094428106296642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160. doi:10.1177/0149206313503014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 816–841. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.606716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. J., & Boyle, B. (2015). Professional diversity, identity salience and team innovation: The moderating role of openmindedness norms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 873–894. doi:10.1002/job.v36.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S., Macmillan, K., & van Soeren, M. R. N. (2010). Leadership of interprofessional health and social care teams: A socio-historical analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 258–264. doi:10.1111/jnm.2010.18.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2014). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Bannon, D. P., & Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–438. doi:10.2307/2393297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 777–800. doi:10.1177/0013161X05279448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132–157. doi:10.1177/0149206305277799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hägele, S., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61, 1463–1492. doi:10.1177/0018726708095711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. (2017). Leadership in public organizations. Leadership in public organizations (3rd ed. ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51, 355–387. doi:10.1111/apps.2002.51.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar